Biofidelity assessment of the 6-year-old ATDs in lateral impact

References

• Arbogast KB, Jermakian JS, Kallan MJ. Effectiveness of belt positioning booster seats: an updated assessment. Pediatrics. 2009;124:1281–1286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbogast KB, Kallan MJ, Durbin DR. Effectiveness of high back and backless belt-positioning booster seats in side impact crashes. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2005;49:201–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arbogast KB, Moll EK, Morris SD, Anderko RL, Durbin DR, Winston FK. Factors influencing pediatric injury in side impact collisions. J Trauma. 2001;51:469–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson M, Burleigh M, Barnes A, Waagmeester K, van Ratingen M. Q3S 3 tear old side impact dummy development. Paper presented at: 20th Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh JM, Walilko TJ, Malhotra A, Zhu Y, King AI. Biomechanical response and injury tolerance of the pelvis in twelve sled side impacts. Paper presented at: 34th Stapp Car Crash Conference; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly BR, Moorhouse K. Optimized phasing of PMHS response curves for biofidelity targets. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Elhagediab AM, Hardy WN, Rouhana SW. Advancements in the rate-sensitive abdomen for the Hybrid III family of dummies. J Biomech. 2006;39(Suppl 1):S158.
   Google Scholar
• Franklyn M. Pediatric material properties: a review of human child and animal surrogates. Crit Rev Bioeng. 2007;35(3/4):197–342.
   Google Scholar
• Howard H, Rothman L, Moses McKeag A, et al. Children in side-impact motor vehicle crashes: seating positions and injury mechanisms. J Trauma. 2004;56:1276–1285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hybrid III 6-Year-Old User Manual. Plymouth, MI: First Technology Safety Systems, Inc; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin AL, Mertz HJ. Biomechanical Basis for the CRABI and Hybrid III Child Dummies. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin AL, Mertz HJ. Rationale for and dimensions of impact surfaces for biofidelity tests of different sizes of frontal and side impact dummies. Stapp Car Crash J. 2010;54:19–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Irwin AL, Mertz HJ, Elhagediab AM, Moss S. Guidelines for assessing the biofidelity of side impact dummies of various sizes and ages. Stapp Car Crash J. 2002;46:297–319.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ISO. Road Vehicles—Anthropometric Side Impact Dummy—Lateral Impact Response Requirements to Assess the Biofidelity of the Dummy. 1st ed. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 1999. ISO/TR 9790 Technical Report 1999-12-01.
   Google Scholar
• Ita M, Kang Y, Seacrist T, Dahle E, Bolte J. Comparison of Q3s ATD biomechanical responses to pediatric volunteers. Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15:215–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinich KD, Reed MP, Manary MA, Orton NR. Development and testing of a more realistic pelvis for the Hybrid III 6-year-old ATD. Traffic Inj Prev. 2010;11:606–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorhouse K. An improved normalization methodology for developing mean human response curves. Paper presented at: 23rd Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. NHTSA's Biomechanics Research Plan, 2011–2015. 2011. DOT HS 811 474. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Child Restraint Systems—Side Impact Protection. 2014a. Docket No. NHTSA-2014-0012 RIN 2127-AK95. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Traffic Safety Facts 2012: Children. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation; 2014b. DOT HS 812 011.
   Google Scholar
• Q3s User Manual. Plymouth, MI: Humanetics Innovative Solutions; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Q6 (Advanced 6-Year-Old Child) User Manual. Plymouth, MI: Humanetics Innovative Solutions; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rhule H, Donnelly B, Moorhouse K, Kang YS. A methodology for generating objective targets for quantitatively assessing the biofidelity of crash test dummies. Paper presented at: 23rd Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rhule H, Maltese M, Donnelly BR, Eppinger RH, Brunner J, Bolte JH. Development of a new biofidelity ranking system for anthropometric test devices. Paper presented at: 46th Stapp Car Crash Conference; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Rouhana SW. Abdominal impact injury research—a review. J Biomech. 2006;39(Suppl 1):S157–S158.
   Google Scholar
• SAE International. Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice. Instrumentation for Impact Test—Part 1—Electronic Instrumentation. Warrendale, PA: SAE International; 2003. SAE Standard J211-1.
   Google Scholar
• Seacrist T, Locey CM, Mathews EA, et al. Evaluation of pediatric ATD as compared to child volunteers in low-speed far-side oblique and lateral impacts. Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(Suppl 1):S206–S214.
   Google Scholar
• Suntay B, Moorhouse K, Bolte J. Characterization of the pediatric shoulder's resistance to lateral loading conditions. Paper presented at: 22nd Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tylko S, Charlebois D, Bussieres A. In-vehicle crash testing for the development of a child side impact test protocol. Paper presented at: 7th Conference “Protection of Children in Cars”; 2009; Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• van Ratingen M, Twisk D, Schrooten M, Beusenberg M. Biomechanically based design and performance targets for a 3-year-old child crash dummy for frontal and side impact. Paper presented at: 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Parenteau CS. Fatalities of children 0–7 years old in the second row. Traffic Inj Prev. 2008;9(3):231–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger DR, Pring M. Children are not just small adults. In: Wenger DR, Pring ME, eds. Rang's Children's Fractures. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2005:1–2.
   Google Scholar