Analysis of occupant kinematics and dynamics in nearside oblique impacts

References

• Adomeit D. Seat Design—A Significant Factor for Safety Belt Effectiveness. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1979. Paper No. 791004.
   Google Scholar
• Adomeit D, Goegler H, Vu Han V. Expected belt-specific injury patterns dependent on the angle of impact. Paper presented at: 3rd International Conference on Impact Trauma; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Adomeit D, Heger A. Motion sequence criteria and design proposals for restraint devices in order to avoid unfavorable biomechanic conditions and submarining. Paper presented at: 19th Stapp Car Crash Conference; 1975; Warrendale, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Bean J, Kahane C, Mynatt M. Fatalities in Frontal Crashes Despite Seat Belts and Air Bags—Review of All CDS Cases—Model and Calendar Years 2000–2007—122 Fatalities. Washington, DC: NHTSA, US Department of Transportation; 2009. NHTSA Technical Report: DOT HS 811 202.
   Google Scholar
• Brumbelow M, Zuby D. Impact and injury patterns in frontal crashes of vehicles with good ratings for frontal crash protection. Paper presented at: 21st ESV Conference; 2009; Stuttgart, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Cappozzo A, Della Croce U, Leardini A, Chiari L. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 1: theoretical background. Gait Posture. 2005;21:186–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiari L, Della Croce U, Leardini A, Cappozzo A. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 2: instrumental errors. Gait Posture. 2005;21:197–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandall J, Kent R, Patrie J, Fertile J, Martin P. Rib fracture patterns and radiologic detection: a restraint-based comparison. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2000;44:235–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Della Croce U, Leardini A, Chiari L, Cappozzo A. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 4: assessment of anatomical landmark misplacement and its effects on joint kinematics. Gait Posture. 2005;21:226–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman J, López-Valdés F, Lessley D, et al. Rear seat occupant safety: an investigation of a progressive force-limiting, pretensioning 3-point belt system using adult PMHS in frontal sled tests. Stapp Car Crash J. 2009;53:49–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forman J, Michaelson J, Kent R, Kuppa S, Bostrom O. Occupant restraint in the rear seat: ATD responses to standard and pre-tensioning, force-limiting belt restraints. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008;52:141–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray H. Anatomy of the Human Body. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger; 1918.
   Google Scholar
• Hallman J, Yoganandan N, Pintar F, et al. Injury differences between small and large overlap frontal crashes. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2011;55:147–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hontschik R, Ruter G. Investigations into the efficacy of three-point seat belts in oblique impact experiments. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; 1980; Bron, France.
   Google Scholar
• Horsch JD. Occupant Dynamics as a Function of Impact Angle and Belt Restraint. Warrendale, PA: SAE; 1980. SAE Paper No. 801310.
   Google Scholar
• Insurance Institute of Highway Safety. Small Overlap Frontal Crashworthiness Evaluation Crash Test Protocol (Version II). Arlington, VA: Insurance Institute of Highway Safety; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Iraeus J, Lindkvist M, Wistrand S, Sibgård E, Pipkorn B. Evaluation of chest injury mechanisms in nearside oblique frontal impacts. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2013;57:183–196.
   Google Scholar
• Kallieris D, Schmidt G, Schueler F. Thoraxbelastung und Verletzungsmuster bei der Schrägkollision [Thorax load and pattern of injury in oblique collisions]. Beitr Gerichtl Med. 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kent R, Shaw G, Lessley D, Crandall J, Kallieris D, Svensson M. Comparison of Belted Hybrid III, THOR, and Cadaver Thoracic Responses in Oblique Frontal and Full Frontal Tests. Warrendale, PA: SAE; 2003. SAE Paper No. 2003-01-0169.
   Google Scholar
• Leardini A, Chiari L, Della Croce U, Cappozzo A. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. Gait Posture. 2005;21:212–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindkvist M, Hall A, Bjornstig U. Car structural characteristics of fatal frontal crashes in Sweden. Int J Crashworthiness. 2004;9:587–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindkvist M, Hall A, Björnstig U. Kinematics of belted fatalities in frontal collisions: a new approach in deep studies of injury mechanisms. J T. 2006;61:1506–1516.
   Google Scholar
• López-Valdés FJ, Forman J, Kent R, Bostrom O, Segui-Gomez M. A comparison between a child-size PMHS and the Hybrid III 6 YO in a sled frontal impact. Annu Adv Automot Med. 2009;53:237–246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• López-Valdés FJ, Juste O, Pipkorn B, et al. A comparison of the performance of two advanced restraint systems in frontal impacts. Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(Suppl 1):S119–S125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Valdés F, Juste-Lorente O. Innovative restraints to prevent chest injuries in frontal impacts. Paper presented at: Conference for the Enhancement of Safety Vehicles (ESV) 2015; Gothenborg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• López-Valdés FJ, Lau A, Lamp J, et al. Analysis of spinal motion and loads during frontal impacts. Comparison between PMHS and ATD. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010;54:61–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mueller B, Sherwood C, Arbelaez R, Zuby D, Nolan J. Comparison of Hybrid III and THOR dummies in paired small overlap tests. Stapp Car Crash J. 2011;55:379–409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parent D, Craig M, Ridella S, McFadden J. Thoracic biofidelity assessment of the THOR Mod-Kit ATD. Paper presented at: 23rd ESV Conference; 2013; Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Pipkorn B, López-Valdés FJ, Lundgren C, Brase D, Sunnevang C. Innovative seat belt system for reduced chest deflection. Paper presented at: Conference for the Enhancement of Safety Vehicles (ESV); 2015; Gothenborg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Rudd R, Scarboro M, Saunders J. Injury analysis of real-world small overlap and oblique frontal crashes. Paper presented at: 22nd ESV Conference; 2011; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders J, Parent D, Ames E. NHTSA oblique crash test results: vehicle performance and occupant injury risk assessment in vehicles with small overlap countermeasures. Paper presented at: 24th ESV Conference; 2015; Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw G, Crandall J, Butcher J. Biofidelity evaluation of the THOR advanced frontal crash dummy. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; 2000; Montpellier; France.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw G, Parent D, Purtsezov S, et al. Impact response of restrained PMHS in frontal sled tests: skeletal deformation patterns under seat belt loading. Stapp Car Crash J. 2009;53:1–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Society of Automotive Engineers. Instrumentation for Impact Test. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1998. Document No. J211.
   Google Scholar
• Sunnevång C, Lecuyer E, Hynd D, Carroll J, Kruse D, Boström O. Evaluation of near-side oblique frontal impacts using THOR with SD3 shoulder. Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(S1):S96–S102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornvall FV, Svensson MY, Davidsson J, Flogard A, Kallieris D, Haland Y. Frontal impact dummy kinematics in oblique frontal collisions: evaluation against post mortem human subject test data. Traffic Inj Prev. 2005;6:340–350.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Pintar F, Schlick M, Moore J, Maiman D. Comparison of head–neck responses in frontal impacts using restrained human surrogates. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2011;55:181–191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar