Small female rib cage fracture in frontal sled tests

References

• Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005 (2008 Update). Des Plaines, IL: Author; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnick SL. Bone Densitometry in Clinical Practice: Application and Interpretation. 3rd ed. Totowa, NJ: Humana; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom O, Haland Y. Benefits of a 3+2 point belt system and an inboard torso side support in frontal, far-side and rollover crashes. Paper presented at: International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); 2003; Nagoya, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Bulger EM, Arneson MA, Mock CN, Jurkovich GJ. Rib fractures in the elderly. J Trauma. 2000;48:1040–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogbill TH, Landercasper J. Injury to the chest wall. In: Feliciano DV, Moore EE, Mattox KL, eds. Trauma. 3rd ed. Stamford, CT: Appleton and Lange; 1996, 355–374.
   Google Scholar
• Crandall JR, Kent RW, Patrie J, Fertile J, Martin PG. Rib fracture patterns and radiologic detection—a restraint-based comparison. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2000;44:235–259.
   Google Scholar
• Eppinger R, Marcus J, Morgan R. Development of Dummy and Injury Index for NHTSAs Thoracic Side Impact Protection Research Program. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1984. Paper 840885.
   Google Scholar
• Forman JL, Lessley DJ, Kent RW, Bostrom O, Pipkorn B. Whole-body kinematic and dynamic response of restrained PMHS in frontal sled tests. Stapp Car Crash J. 2006;50:299–336.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Funk JP, Cormier JM, Gabler HP. Effect of delta-V errors in NASS on frontal crash risk calculations. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008;52:155–164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kallieris D, Mellander H, Schmidt G, Barz J, Mattern R. Comparison between frontal impact tests with cadavers and dummies in a simulated true car restrained environment. Paper presented at: Stapp Car Crash Conference; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Kemper A, Beeman S, Duma S. Effects of pre-impact bracing on chest compression of human occupants in low-speed frontal sled tests. Paper presented at: 22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); June 13–16, 2011; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Kent RW, Henary BY, Matsuoka F. On the fatal crash experience of older drivers. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2005;49:371–391.
   Google Scholar
• Kent RW, Lopez-Valdes FJ, Dennis NJ, et al. Assessment of a three-point restraint system with a pre-tensioned lap belt and an inflatable, force-limited shoulder belt. Stapp Car Crash J. 2011;55:144–159.
   Google Scholar
• Kent RW, Sherwood CP, Lessley DJ, Overby B, Matsuoka F. Age-related changes in the effective stiffness of the human thorax using four loading conditions. Paper presented at: International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI) Conference; 2003; Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Kent RW, Stacey S, Kindig M, et al. Biomechanical response of the pediatric abdomen, part 2: injuries and their correlation with engineering parameters. Stapp Car Crash J. 2008;52:135–166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KeySafetySystems. 2014. Available at: http://www.keysafetyinc.com/pdfs/adaptive_load_limiter.pdf. Accessed September 2014.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell MA, Fryar CD, Ogden CL, Flegal KM. Anthropometric Reference Data for Children and Adults: United States, 2003–2006. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Mertz HJ, Dalmotas DJ. Effects of shoulder belt limit forces on adult thoracic protection in frontal collisions. Stapp Car Crash J. 2007;51:361–380.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mertz HJ, Irwin AL, Prasad P. Biomechanical and scaling bases for frontal and side impact injury assessment reference values. Stapp Car Crash J. 2003;47:155–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris A, Welsh R, Frampton R, Charlton J, Fildes B. An overview of requirements for the crash protection of older drivers. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2002;46:141–156.
   Google Scholar
• Morris A, Welsh R, Hassan A. Requirements for the crash protection of older vehicle passengers. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2003;47:165–180.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen TV, Center JR, Eisman JA. Femoral neck bone loss predicts fracture risk independent of baseline BMD. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:1195–1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHTSA. ATD Thoracic Response Test Development, Gold Standard Buck Condition 2.1: Force Limited Belt, 30 km/h Frontal, PMHS 509, 517, 568, 656, 657, Tests UVAS0209-213. Center for Applied Biomechanics Automobile Safety Laboratory University of Virginia; 2014. Available at: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/database/VSR/bio/QueryTest.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. NHTSA Biomechanics Test Database Information. n.d. Available at: www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/database/bio/information.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Nirula R, Pintar FA. Identification of vehicle components associated with severe thoracic injury in motor vehicle crashes: a CIREN and NASS analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40:137–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick L. Frontal force impact tolerance of the human thorax. In Backaitis S, ed. Biomechanics of Impact Injury and Injury Tolerances of the Thorax–Shoulder Complex. Warrenton, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1994. Publication PT-45.
   Google Scholar
• Petit P, Portier L, Trosseille X. Rigid body model of the Hybrid III dummy lower limb including muscle tension under car crash conditions. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact; 1998; Goteborg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Pilkey WD, Balandin DV, Bolotnik NN, Crandall JR, Purtsezov S. Thoracic injury control In: Injury Biomechanics and Control: Optimal Protection from Impact. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ridella S, Rupp J, Poland K. Age-related differences in AIS 3+ crash injury risk, types, causation and mechanisms. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact; 2012; Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Rouhana SW, Bedewi PG, Sundeep VK, et al. Biomechanics of 4-point seat belt systems in frontal impacts. Stapp Car Crash J. 2003;47:367–399.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider LW, Haffner MP, Eppinger RH, et al. Development of an Advanced ATD Thorax System for Improved Injury Assessment in Frontal Crash Environments. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1992. Paper 922520.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw CG, Lessley DJ, Crandall JR, Kent RW, Kitis L. Elimination of Thoracic Muscle Tensing Effects for Frontal Crash Dummies. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 2005. Paper 2005-01-0307.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw CG, Parent DP, Purtsezov S, et al. Impact response of restrained PMHS in frontal sled tests: skeletal deformation patterns under seat belt loading. Stapp Car Crash J. 2009;53:1–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TRW. 2014. Available at: http://www.trw.com/occupant_safety_systems/seat_belts/load_limiters. Accessed September 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Untaroiu CD, Bose D, Lu YC, Riley PO, Lessley DJ, Sochor M. Effect of seat belt pretensioners on human abdomen and thorax: biomechanical response and risk of injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72:1304–1315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Transportation, NHTSA. National Automotive Sampling System/Crashworthiness Data System 1994–1996. Washington, DC: Author; 1999. DOT HS 808 905.
   Google Scholar
• Verriest J, Chapon A. Validity of Thoracic Injury Criteria Based on the Number of Rib Fractures. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1985. Paper 856027.
   Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Warner CY, Kroell CK. Comparative thoracic impact response of living and sacrificed porcine siblings. Paper presented at: Stapp Car Crash Conference; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Wuermser LA, Achenbach SJ, Amin S, Khosla S, Melton LJ. What accounts for rib fractures in older adults? J Osteoporos. 2011. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/457591.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zellmer H, Eickhoff B, Kahler C. Optimised pretensioning of the belt system: a rating criterion and the benefit in consumer tests. Paper presented at: International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); 2005; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar