Investigating the influence on safety of retrofitting Italian motorways with barriers meeting a new EU standard

References

• American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). Practice for the Crash Testing of Safety Hardware Devices for Use on the National Highway System (NHS). 2009.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Highway Safety Manual. 1st ed. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, Author; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• ANAS Italian National Road Authority. Cost of the implementation for road construction 2012.
   Google Scholar
• AustRoads. Improving Roadside Safety—Stage 3: Interim Report. 2012. AP-R419-12. Sydney, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cafiso S, D'Agostino C. Reliability-based assessment of benefits in roadway safety management. Transp Res Rec. 2015;2513:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cafiso S, D'Agostino C. Assessing the stochastic variability of the benefit–cost ratio in roadway safety management. Accid Anal Prev. 2016;93:189–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cafiso S, D'Agostino C, Persaud B. Investigating the influence of segmentation in estimating safety performance functions for roadway sections. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting Proceedings; January 13–17 2013; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Cafiso S, Di Silvestro G, Persaud B, Begum MA. Revisiting variability of dispersion parameter of safety performance for two-lane rural roads. Transp Res Rec. 2010;2148:38–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Agostino C. Investigating transferability and goodness of fit of two different approaches of segmentation and model form for estimating safety performance of motorways. Procedia Eng. 2014; pp. 613–623.
   Google Scholar
• Elvik R, Hoye A, Vaa T, Sorensen M. Handbook of Road Safety Measures. 2nd ed. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• European Standards, CSN EN 1317-2. Road restraint systems - Part 2: Performance classes, impact test acceptance criteria and test methods for safety barriers including vehicle parapets. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick K, Lord D, Park BJ. Accident modification factors for medians freeways and multilane rural highways in Texas. Transp Res Rec. 2008;2083:62–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan A, Shen J, Rodriguez A. Update of Florida Crash Reduction Factors and Countermeasures to Improve the Development of District. Safety Improvement Projects. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Transportation; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gross F, Persaud B, Lyon L. A Guide to Developing Quality Crash Modification Factors. Vienna, VA: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration; 2010. Report No. FHWA-SA-10-032.
   Google Scholar
• Hauer E. Observational before–after Studies in Road Safety. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Hauer E. Overdispersion in modelling accidents on road sections and in empirical Bayes estimation. Accid Anal Prev. 2001;33:799–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauer E, Bamfo J. Two tools for finding what function links the dependent variable to the explanatory variables. Paper presented at: ICTCT Conference; November 5–7, 1997; Lund, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Heydecker BG, Wu J. Identification of sites for road accident remedial work by Bayesian statistical methods: an example of uncertain inference. Adv Eng Softw. 2001;32:859–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higle JL, Witkowski JM. Bayesian identification of hazardous locations. Transp Res Rec. 1988;1185:24–36.
   Google Scholar
• ISTAT National Italian Institute of Statistics. I Dati Sugli Incidenti Stradali Rilevati nel 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 [Statistics on crash data of the years]. Milan, Italy: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Italian Ministry of Transportation. Studio di Valutazione dei Costi Sociali dell'Incidentalità Stradale. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lord D, Persaud B. Accident prediction models with and without trend. Transp Res Rec. 2007;1717:40–48.
   Google Scholar
• Miaou S-P, Lord D. Modeling traffic crash-flow relationships for intersections: dispersion parameter, functional form, and Bayes versus empirical Bayes methods. Transp Res Rec. 2003;1840:31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Persaud B, Lyon C. Empirical Bayes before–after safety studies: lessons learned from two decades of experience and future directions. Accid Anal Prev. 2007;39:546–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persaud B, Lyon C, Eccles K, Soika J. Safety effectiveness of centerline plus shoulder rumble strips on two-lane rural roads. J Transp Eng. 2016;142(5).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross HE Jr, Sicking DL, Zimmer RA, Michie JD. Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council; 1993. NCHRP Report 350.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute. SAS Help and Documentation. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2002–2008.
   Google Scholar
• Scully J, Newstead S, Corben B, Candappa N. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the $240M Statewide Blackspot Program—Accident Blackspot Component. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: Monash University Accident Research Centre; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Turner B, Imberger K, Roper P, Pyta V, McLean J. Road Safety Engineering Risk Assessment Part 6: Crash Reduction Factors. Sydney, Australia: Austroads; 2010. AP-T151/10.
   Google Scholar
• Yates F. Contingency table involving small numbers and the χ2 test. J R Stat Soc. 1934;1:217–235.
   Google Scholar
• Zegeer CV, Hummer J, Herf L, Reinfurt D, Hunter W. Safety Cost-effectiveness of Incremental Changes in Cross-section Design—Informational Guide. McLean, VA: United States Federal Highway Administration; 1987. FHWA/RD-87-094.
   Google Scholar