Real-world adjustments of driver seat and head restraint in Saab 9-3 vehicles

References

• Berton RJ. Whiplash: Tests of the Initial Influence Variables. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1968. SAE Paper No. 680080.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson A. Addressing Female Whiplash Injury Protection—A Step Towards 50th Percentile Female Rear Impact Occupant Models [doctoral dissertation]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Department of Applied Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson A, Chang F, Lemmen P, et al. Anthropometric specifications, development, and evaluation of EvaRID—a 50th percentile female rear impact finite element dummy model. Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15:855–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson A, Linder A, Davidsson J, Hell W, Schick S, Svensson M. Dynamic kinematic responses of female volunteers in rear impacts and comparison to previous male volunteer tests. Traffic Inj Prev. 2011;12:347–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson A, Siegmund GP, Linder A, Svensson M. Motion of the head and neck of female and male volunteers in rear impact car-to-car tests at 4 and 8 km/h. Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13:378–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson G, Nilsson S, Nilsson-Ehle A, Norin H, Ysander L, Örtengren R. Neck injuries in rear end car collisions; biomechanical considerations to improve head restraints. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; June 24–26, 1985; Göteborg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Chapline JF, Ferguson SA, Lillis RP, Lund AK, Williams AF. Neck pain and head restraint position relative to the driver's head in rear-end collisions. Accid Anal Prev. 2000;32:287–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft AC, Haneline MT, Freeman MD. Differential occupant kinematics and forces between frontal and rear automobile impacts at low speed: evidence for a differential injury risk. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 18–20, 2002; Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen E, Stabler K, Mackay GM, Parkin S. Head restraint positioning and occupant safety in rear impacts: the case for smart restraints. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 11–13, 1996; Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher C. Movement of car occupants in rear-end accidents. Paper presented at: CNR-PFT2 ELASIS International Conference on Active and Passive Automobile Safety; October 10–11, 1996; Capri, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Eichberger A, Geigl BC, Moser A, Fachbach B, Steffan H. Comparison of different car seats regarding head–neck kinematics of volunteers during rear end impact. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 11–13, 1996; Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer CM, Wells JK, Werner JV. Relationship of head restraint positioning to driver neck injury in rear-end crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 1999;31:719–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galasko CSB, Murray PA, Pitcher M. Whiplash associated disorders. Paper presented at: 15th ESV Conference; May 13–17, 1996; Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett JW, Morris DF. Performance Evaluation of Automobile Head Restraints. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1972. SAE Paper No. 720034.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson L, Sperling L, Gard G, Ipsen S, Olivares Vergara C. Swedish anthropometrics for product and workplace design. Appl Ergon. 2009;40:797–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hell W, Langwieder K, Walz F, et al. Consequences for seat design due to rear end accident analysis, sled tests and possible test criteria for reducing cervical spine injuries after rear-end collision. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 23–24, 1999; Sitges, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Special Issue: Whiplash Injuries—Saving Our Necks in Car Crashes. Arlington, VA: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsson L, Norin H. AIS1 injury reducing effect of WHIPS (Whiplash Protection System). Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 22–24, 2004; Graz, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson B, Stenlund H, Svensson MY, Björnstig U. Backset and cervical retraction capacity among occupants in a modern car. Traffic Inj Prev. 2007;8:87–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kahane CJ. An Evaluation of Head Restraints. Washington, DC: NHTSA, US Department of Transportation; 1982. DOT HS-806 108.
   Google Scholar
• Kihlberg JK. Flexion–torsion neck injury in rear impacts. Paper presented at: 13th Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine; October 16–17, 1969; Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Krafft M. A comparison of short- and long-term consequences of AIS1 neck injuries, in rear impacts. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 16–18, 1998; Göteborg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Kullgren A, Eriksson L, Boström O, Krafft M. Validation of neck injury criteria using reconstructed real-life rear-end crashes with recorded crash pulses. Paper presented at: 18th ESV Conference; May 19–22, 2003; Nagoya, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Kullgren A, Krafft M, Lie A, Tingvall C. The effect of whiplash protection systems in real-life crashes and their correlation to consumer crash test programmes. Paper presented at: 20th ESV Conference; June 18–21, 2007; Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Kullgren A, Stigson H, Krafft M. Development of whiplash associated disorders for male and female car occupants in cars launched since the 80s in different impact directions. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 11–13, 2013; Göteborg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Linder A, Carlsson A, Svensson MY, Siegmund GP. Dynamic responses of female and male volunteers in rear impacts. Traffic Inj Prev. 2008;9:592–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubin S, Sehmer J. Are automobile head restraints used effectively? Can Fam Physician. 1993;39:1584–1588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malm S, Krafft M, Kullgren A, Ydenius A, Tingvall C. Risk of permanent medical impairment (RPMI) in road traffic accidents. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008;52:93–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minton R, Murray P, Pitcher M, Galasko CSB. Causative factors in whiplash injury: implications for current seat and head restraint design. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 24–26, 1997; Hanover, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Mordaka J, Gentle RC. The biomechanics of gender difference and whiplash injury: designing safer car seats for women. Acta Politechnica. 2003;43:47–54.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Head Restraints. Washington, DC: Author, US Department of Transportation; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Nygren Å. Injuries to car occupants—some aspects of the interior safety of cars. Akta Oto-Laryngol. 1984; 395:1–164.
   Google Scholar
• Nygren Å, Gustafsson H, Tingvall C. Effects of different types of headrests in rear-end collisions. Paper presented at: 10th ESV Conference; July 1–4, 1985; Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson I, Bunketorp O, Carlsson G, et al. An in-depth study of neck injuries in rear end collisions. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 12–14, 1990; Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Ono K, Ejima S, Suzuki Y, Kaneoka K, Fukushima M, Ujihashi S. Prediction of neck injury risk based on the analysis of localized cervical vertebral motion of human volunteers during low-speed rear impacts. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 20–22, 2006; Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Ono K, Kanno M. Influences of the physical parameters on the risk to neck injuries in low impact speed rear-end collisions. Accid Anal Prev. 1996;28:493–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter M, Otte D, Pohlemann T, Krettek C, Blauth M. Whiplash-type neck distortion in restrained car drivers: frequency, causes and long-term results. Eur Spine J. 2000;9:109–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schick S, Horion S, Thorsteinsdottir K, Hell W. Differences and commons in kinetic parameters of male and female volunteers in low speed rear end impacts. Paper presented at: 2nd TÜV SÜD Conference, Whiplash–Neck Pain in Car Crashes; November 18–19, 2008; Erding, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider LW, Robbins DH, Pflüg MA, Snyder RG. Development of Anthropometrically Based Design Specifications for an Advanced Adult Anthropomorphic Dummy Family. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute; 1983. Final Report, UMTRI-83-53-1.
   Google Scholar
• Severy DM, Brink HM, Baird JD. Preliminary Findings of Head Support Designs. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1967. SAE Paper No. 670921.
   Google Scholar
• Severy DM, Brink HM, Baird JD. Vehicle Design for Passenger Protection from High Speed Rear End Collisions. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1968. SAE Paper No. 680774.
   Google Scholar
• Siegmund GP, King DJ, Lawrence JM, et al. Head/neck kinematic response of human subjects in low-speed rear-end collisions. Paper presented at: 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference; November 13–14, 1997; Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Stemper BD, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA. Effect of head restraint backset on head–neck kinematics in whiplash. Accid Anal Prev. 2006;38:317–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigson H, Gustafsson M, Sunnevång C, Krafft M, Kullgren A. Differences in long-term medical consequences depending on impact direction involving passenger cars. Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16:133–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson MY, Lövsund P, Håland Y, Larsson S. Rear-end Collisions—A Study of the Influence of Backrest Properties on Head–Neck Motion Using a New Dummy Neck. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1993. Paper No. 930343.
   Google Scholar
• Szabo TJ, Welcher JB, Anderson RD, et al. Human occupant kinematic response to low-speed rear end impacts. Paper presented at: 38th Stapp Car Crash Conference; October31–November 4, 1994; Fort Lauderdale, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Vasavada AN, Danaraj J, Siegmund GP. Head and neck anthropometry, vertebral geometry and neck strength in height-matched men and women. J Biomech. 2008;41:114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viano DC. Seat influences on female neck responses in rear crashes: a reason why women have higher whiplash rates. Traffic Inj Prev. 2003;4:228–239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Viano DC. Seat design principles to reduce neck injuries in rear impacts. Traffic Inj Prev. 2008;9:552–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Gargan MF. Headrest position during normal driving: implication to neck injury risk in rear crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 1996;28:665–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe Y, Ichikawa H, Kayama O, Ono K, Kaneoka K, Inami S. Influence of seat characteristics on occupant motion in low-velocity rear-end impacts. Accid Anal Prev. 2000;32:243–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welcher JB, Szabo JS. Relationships between seat properties and human subject kinematics in rear impact tests. Accid Anal Prev. 2001;33:289–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Whiplash Commission. The Whiplash Commission Final Report. 2005. Available at: http://www.whiplashkommissionen.sse/pdf/WK_finalreport.pdf. Accessed July 7, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Wiklund K, Larsson H. Saab Active Head Restraint (SAHR)—Seat Design to Reduce the Risk of Neck Injuries in Rear Impacts. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1998. SAE Paper No. 980297.
   Google Scholar
• Young AL, Ragel BT, Su E, Mann CN, Frank EH. Assessing automobile head restraint positioning in Portland, Oregon. Inj Prev. 2005;11:97–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuby DS, Lund AK. Preventing minor neck injuries in rear crashes—forty years of progress. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;524:428–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar