Effects of whole spine alignment patterns on neck responses in rear end impact

References

• Barnsley L, Lord SM, Wallis BJ, Bogduk N. The prevalence of chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain after whiplash. Spine. 1995;20:20–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson A, Chang F, Lemmen P, et al. Anthropometric specifications, development, and evaluation of EvaRID—a 50th percentile female rear impact finite element dummy model. Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15:855–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson A, Linder A, Davidsson J, Hell W, Schick S, Svensson M. Dynamic kinematic responses of female volunteers in rear impacts and comparison to previous male volunteer tests. Traffic Inj Prev. 2011;12:347–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson A, Siegmund GP, Linder A, Svensson M. Motion of the head and neck of female and male 6 volunteers in rear impact car-to-car tests at 4 and 8 km/h. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 15–16, 2010; Hanover, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen TB, Frostholm L, Oernboel E, et al. Are there gender differences in coping with neck pain following acute whiplash trauma? A 12-month follow-up study. Eur J Pain. 2012;16:49–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabert L, Ghannouchi S, Cavallero C. Geometrical characterisation of a seated occupant. Paper presented at: 16th ESV Conference; May 31–June 4, 1998; Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Chancey VC, Nightingale RW, Van Ee CA, Knaub KE, Myers BS. Improved estimation of human neck tensile tolerance: reducing the range of reported tolerance using anthropometrically correct muscles and optimized physiologic initial conditions. Paper presented at: 47th Stapp Car Crash Conference; October 27–29, 2003; San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• DeRosia J. Role of Gender and Size in Biomechanics of Rear Impact [PhD dissertation]. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gehre C, Gades H, Wernicke P. Objective rating of signals using test and simulation responses. Paper presented at: 21st ESV Conference; June 15–18, 2009; Stuttgart, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Haedacker JW, Shuford RF, Capicoto PN, Pryor PW. Radiographic standing cervical segmental alignment in adult volunteers without neck symptoms. Spine. 1997;22:1472–1480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helliwel PS, Evans PF, Wright V. The Straight cervical spine: does it indicate muscle spasm? J Bone Joint Surg. 1994;76:103–106.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsson L, Norin H, Svensson MY. Parameters influencing AIS 1 neck injury outcome in frontal impacts. Traffic Inj Prev. 2004;5:156–163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kitagawa Y, Yamada K, Motojima H, Yasuki T. Consideration on gender difference of whiplash associated disorder in low speed rear impact. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 9–11, 2015; Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Krafft M. When do AIS 1 neck injuries result in long-term consequences—vehicle and human factors. Traffic Inj Prev. 2002;3:89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Krafft M, Kullgren A, Lie A, Tingvall C. The risk of whiplash injury in the rear seat compared to the front seat in rear impacts. Traffic Inj Prev. 2003;4:136–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee JH, Park YK, Kim JH. Chronic neck pain in young adults: perspectives on anatomic differences. Spine J. 2014;14:2628–2638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liliang PC, Lu K, Hsieh C-H, Kao CY, Wang KW, Chen HJ. Pulsed radiofrequency of cervical medial branches for treatment of whiplash-related cervical zygapophysial joint pain. Surg Neurol. 2008;70(Suppl):50–55.
   Google Scholar
• Linder A, Carlsson A, Svensson MY, Siegmund GP. Dynamic responses of female and male volunteers in rear impacts. Traffic Inj Prev. 2008;9:592–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu YK, Dai QG. The second stiffest axis of a beam-column: implications for cervical spine trauma. J Biomech Eng. 1989;111(2):122–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord SM, Barnsley L, Wallis BJ, McDonald GJ, Bogduk N. Precutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy for chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1721–1726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiman DJ, Sances A Jr, Myklebust JB, et al. Compression injury of the cervical spine. Neurosurgery. 1983;13:254–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiman DJ, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA. Preinjury cervical alignment affecting spinal trauma. J Neurosurg. 2002;97:57–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Suzuki N, Toyama Y, Shiga H. Cervical curvature in acute whiplash injures: prospective comparative study with asymptomatic subjects. Injury. 1998;29:775–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Japan: Annual Report of Anthropometry Data by Age in 2012. October 15, 2013. Available at: http://www.e-stat.go.jp/SG1/estat/List.do?bid=000001077241&cycode=0. Accessed February 1, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Miyazaki Y, Ujihashi S, Mochimaru M, Kouchi M. Influence of the head shape variation on brain damage under impact. Paper presented at: SAE Digital Human Modeling for Design and Engineering Symposium; June 14–16, 2005; Iowa City, IA.
   Google Scholar
• Mochimaru M, Kouchi M. Statistics for 3D human body forms. Paper presented at: SAE Digital Human Modeling for Design and Engineering Conference and Exposition; June 6–8, 2000; Dearborn, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Morris AP, Thomas PD. Neck injuries in the UK Co-operative Crash Injury Study. Paper presented at: 40th Stapp Car Crash Conference; November 4–6, 1996; Albuquerque, NM.
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill B, Haddon W, Kelley AB, Sorenson WW. Automobile head restraints—frequency of neck injury claims in relation to the presence of head restraints. Am J Public Health. 1972;62:399–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono K, Ejima S, Suzuki Y, et al. Prediction of neck injury risk based on the analysis of localized cervical vertebral motion of human volunteers during low-speed rear impacts. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 20–22, 2006; Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Ono K, Inami S, Kaneoka K, et al. Relationship between localized spine deformation and cervical vertebral motions for low speed rear impacts using human volunteers. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 23–24, 1999; Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Ono K, Kaneoka K, Wittek A, Kajzer J. Cervical injury mechanism based on the analysis of human cervical vertebral motion and head–neck–torso kinematics during low speed rear impacts. Paper presented at: 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference; November 13–14, 1997; Lake Buena Vista, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Park SM, Song KS, Park SH, Kang H, Riew KD. Does whole-spine lateral radiograph with clavicle positioning reflect the correct cervical sagittal alignments? Eur Spine J. 2015;24:57–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peleg S, Dar G, Medlej B, et al. Orientation of the human sacrum: anthropological perspectives and methodological approaches. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007;133:967–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintar F, Yoganandan N, Voo L, Cusick JF, Maiman DJ, Sances A Jr. Dynamic characteristics of the human cervical spine. Paper pre presented at: 39th Stapp Car Crash Conference; November 8–10, 1995; San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Pramudita JA, Ono K, Ejima S, Kaneoka K, Shiina I, Ujihashi S. Head/neck/torso behavior and cervical vertebral motion of human volunteers during low speed rear impact: mini-sled tests with mass production car seat. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 19–21, 2007; Maastricht, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Sato F, Antona J, Ejima S, Ono K. Influence on cervical vertebral motion of the interaction between occupant and head restraint/seat, based on the reconstruction of rear-end collision using finite element human model. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 15–16, 2010; Hanover, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Sato F, Nakajima T, Ono K, Svensson M, Brolin K, Kaneoka K. Dynamic cervical vertebral motion of female and male volunteers and analysis of its interaction with head/neck/torso behavior during low-speed rear impact. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 10–12, 2014; Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Sato F, Odani M, Endo Y, et al. Analysis of the alignment of whole spine in automotive seated and supine postures using an upright open MRI system. IJAET. 2016;7:29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider LW, Robbins DH, Pflüg MA, Snyder RG. Development of Anthropometrically Based Design Specifications for an Advanced Adult Anthropomorphic Dummy Family. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute; 1983. Final Report, UMTRI-83-53-1.
   Google Scholar
• Siegmund GP, King DJ, Lawrence JM, et al. Head/neck kinematic response of human subjects in low-speed rear-end collisions. Paper presented at: 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference; November 13–14, 1997; Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Stemper BD, DeRosia J, Yogananan N, Pintar F, Shender B, Paskoff G. Gender dependent cervical spine anatomical differences in size-matched volunteers. Biomed Sci Instrum. 2009;45:149–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stemper BD, Pintar FA, Rao RD. The influence of morphology on cervical injury characteristics. Spine. 2011;36(Suppl):S180–S186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemper BD, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA. Effects of abnormal posture on capsular ligament elongations in a computational model subjected to whiplash loading. J Biomech. 2005;38:1313–1323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemper BD, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, et al. Gender dependent cervical spine segmental kinematics during whiplash. J Biomech. 2003;36:1281–1289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemper BD, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, et al. Gender- and region-dependent local facet joint kinematics in rear impact. Spine. 2004;29:1764–1771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemper BD, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, et al. Anatomical gender differences in cervical vertebrae of size-matched volunteers. Spine. 2008;33:E44–E49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabo TJ, Welcher JB, Anderson RD, Rice M. Human occupant kinematic response to low-speed rear end impacts. Paper presented at: 38th Stapp Car Crash Conference; October 31–November 4, 1994; Fort Lauderdale, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Takeshima T, Omokawa S, Takaoka T, Araki M, Ueda Y, Takakura Y. Sagittal alignment of cervical flexion and extension. Spine. 2002;27: E348–E355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Temming J, Zobel R. Frequency and risk of cervical spine distortion injuries in passenger car accidents: significance of human factors data. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 16–18, 1998; Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Toyota Motor Corporation. Documentation—Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS)—AF50 Occupant Model. Ver 4.0. Nagakute, Aichi, Japan: Author; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Vasavada AN, Danaraj J, Siegmund GP. Head and neck anthropometry, vertebral geometry and neck strength in height-matched men and women. J Biomech. 2008;41:114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe Y, Ichikawa H, Kayama O, Ono K, Kaneoka K, Inami S. Influence of seat characteristics on occupant motion in low-velocity rear-end impacts. Accid Anal Prev. 2000;32:243–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada H. Strength of Biological Materials, Evans FG, ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins Company; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Gennarelli TA, Eppinger RH, Voo LM. Geometrical effects on the mechanism of cervical spine injury due to head impact. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 23–24, 1999; Sitges, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Sances A Jr, Maiman DJ, Myklebust JB, Pech P, Larson SJ. Experimental spinal injuries with vertical impact. Spine. 1986;11:855–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar