Validation of a parametric finite element human femur model

References

• Besnault B, Lavaste F, Guillemot H, Robin S, Le Coz JY. A parametric finite element model of the human pelvis. Stapp Car Crash J. 1998;42:33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bredbenner TL, Mason RL, Havill LM, Orwoll ES, Nicolella DP. Fracture risk predictions based on statistical shape and density modeling of the proximal femur. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29:2090–2100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstein AH, Reilly DT, Martens M. Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:82–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter PM, Flannagan CAC, Reed MP, Cunningham RM, Rupp JD. Comparing the effects of age, BMI and gender on severe injury (AIS 3+) in motor-vehicle crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;72:146–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke B. Normal bone anatomy and physiology. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3(Suppl 3):S131–139.
   Google Scholar
• Dokko Y, Ito O, Ohashi K. Development of Human Lower Limb and Pelvis FE Models for Adult and the Elderly. Detroit, MI: SAE International; 2009. Paper 2009-01-0396.
   Google Scholar
• Gayzik FS, Yu MM, Danelson KA, Slice DE, Stitzel JD. Quantification of age-related shape change of the human rib cage through geometric morphometrics. J Biomech. 2008;41:1545–1554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehre C, Gades H, Wernicke P. Objective rating of signals using test and simulation responses. Paper presented at: 21st Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference; Stuttgart, Germany, June 15–18, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hambli R, Bettamer A, Allaoui S. Finite element prediction of proximal femur fracture pattern based on orthotropic behaviour law coupled to quasi-brittle damage. Med Eng Phys. 2012;34:202–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaney RP. Is the paradigm shifting? Bone. 2003;33:457–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu J, Rupp JD, Lamb TM, Michalak EB, Changm CY, Schneider LW. Computational Investigation of the Effects of Driver and Vehicle Interior Factors on the Risk of Knee–Thigh–Hip Injuries in Frontal Crashes. Detroit, MI: SAE International; 2010. Paper No. 2010-01-1023.
   Google Scholar
• Hu J, Rupp JD, Reed MP. Focusing on vulnerable populations in crashes: recent advances in finite element human models for injury biomechanics research. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy. 2012;3:295–307.
   Google Scholar
• Hu J, Yang KH, Chou CC, King AI. A numerical investigation of factors affecting cervical spine injuries during rollover crashes. Spine. 2008,33:2529–2535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang E, Hallman JJ, Klein KF, Rupp JD, Reed MP, Hu J. Rapid Development of Diverse Human Body Models for Crash Simulations through Mesh Morphing. Detroit, MI: SAE International; 2016. SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1491.
   Google Scholar
• Ivarsson BJ, Genovese D, Crandall JR, Bolton JR, Untaroiu CD, Bose D. The tolerance of the femoral shaft in combined axial compression and bending loading. Stapp Car Crash J. 2009;53:251–290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iwamoto M, Hasegawa J, Miki K, Furusu K, Watanabe I. Development of a finite element model of the total human model for safety (THUMS) and application to injury reconstruction. Paper presented at: International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impacts; Munich, Germany, September 18–20, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Keaveny TM, Hoffmann PF, et al. Femoral bone strength and its relation to cortical and trabecular changes after treatment with PTH, alendronate, and their combination as assessed by finite element analysis of quantitative CT scans. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:1974–1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyak JH, Falkinstein Y. Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load. Med Eng Phys. 2003;25:781–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YS, Choi HH, Cho YN, et al. Numerical investigations of interactions between the knee–thigh–hip complex with vehicle interior structures. Stapp Car Crash J. 2005;49:85–115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klein KF, Hu J, Reed MP, Rupp JD. Development and validation of statistical models of femur geometry for use with parametric finite element models. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015a;43:2503–2514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein KF, Hu J, Reed MP, Rupp JD. Development and Validation of Statistical Models of Femur Geometry for Use with Parametric Finite Element Models. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute; 2015b. UMTRI Report UMTRI-2015-37.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Hu J, Reed MP, et al. Development, validation, and application of a parametric pediatric head finite element model for impact simulations. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011;39:2984–2997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Park BK, Liu W, et al. A statistical skull geometry model for children 0–3 years old. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0127322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu YC, Kemper AR, Gayzik FS, Untaroiu CD, Beillas P. Statistical modeling of human liver incorporating the variations in shape, size, and material properties. Stapp Car Crash J. 2013;57:285–311.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu YC, Untaroiu CD. Statistical shape analysis of clavicular cortical bone with applications to the development of mean and boundary shape models. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2013;111:613–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran SG, McGwin G Jr, Metzger JS, Alonso JE, Rue LW III. Relationship between age and lower extremity fractures in frontal motor vehicle collisions. J Trauma. 2003;54:261–265.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nalla RK, Kruzic JJ, Kinney JH, Ritchie RO. Effect of aging on the toughness of human cortical bone: evaluation by R-curves. Bone 2004;35:1240–1246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park BK, Lumeng JC, Lumeng CN, Ebert SM, Reed MP. Child body shape measurement using depth cameras and a statistical body shape model. Ergonomics. 2015;58:301–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridella SA, Beyersmith A, Poland K. Factors associated with age-related differences in crash injury types, causation, and mechanisms. Paper presented at: Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting; Washington, DC, January 23–27, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Robin S. HUMOS: human model for safety—a joint effort towards the development of refined human-like car occupants models. Paper presented at: 17th Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference; Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 4–7, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Ruan JS, El-Jawahri R, Barbat S, Rouhana SW, Prasad P. Impact response and biomechanical analysis of the knee–thigh–hip complex in frontal impacts. Stapp Car Crash J. 2008;52:505–526.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rupp JD, Flannagan CAC. Effects of occupant age on AIS 3+ injury outcome determined from analyses of fused NASS/CIREN data. Paper presented at: Informal Group for the Harmonization of WorldSID Dummies; Brussels, Belgium, March 2, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Rupp JD, Flannagan CAC, Leslie AJ, Hoff CN, Reed MP, Cunningham RM. Effects of BMI on the risk and frequency of AIS 3+ injuries in motor-vehicle crashes. Obesity. 2013;21:E88–E97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoell SL, Weaver AA, Urban JE, et al. Development and validation of an older occupant finite element model of a mid-sized male for investigation of age-related injury risk. Stapp Car Crash J. 2015;59:359–383.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shi X, Cao L, Reed MP, Rupp JD, Hoff CN, Hu J. A statistical human rib cage geometry model accounting for variations by age, sex, stature and body mass index. J Biomech. 2014;47:2277–2285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi X, Cao L, Reed MP, Rupp JD, Hu J. Effects of obesity on occupant responses in frontal crashes: a simulation analysis using human body models. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2015;18:1280–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestri C, Ray MH. Development of a finite element model of the knee–thigh–hip of a 50th percentile male including ligaments and muscles. Int J Crashworthiness. 2009;14:215–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torigian MS. GHBMC Mid-Size Male Model 2011 Status and Future Plan. SAE, 2011 Government/Industry Meeting, Washington DC, January 27, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Toyota Motor Corporation. THUMS AM50 Pedestrian/Occupant Model Academic Version 4.0. Aichi, Japan: Toyota; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Turkovich MJ. The Effects of Obesity on Occupant Injury Risk in Frontal Impact: A Computer Modeling Approach [PhD thesis]. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• van Rooij L, van Hoof J, McCann MJ, et al. A Finite Element Lower Extremity and Pelvis Model for Predicting Bone Injuries Due to Knee Bolster Loading. Detroit, MI: SAE International; 2004. Paper 2004-01-2130.
   Google Scholar
• Vavalle NA, Schoell SL, Weaver AA, Stitzel JD, Gayzik FS. Application of radial basis function methods in the development of a 95th percentile male seated FEA model. Stapp Car Crash J. 2014;58:361–384.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang RJ, Wang N, Tho CH, Bobineau JP, Wang BP. Metamodeling development for vehicle frontal impact simulation. J Mech Des. 2005;127:1014–1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Arun MWJ, Pintar FA. Normalizing and scaling of data to derive human response corridors from impact tests. J Biomech. 2014;47:1749–1756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zysset PK, Dall'Arra E, Varga P, Pahr DH. Finite element analysis for prediction of bone strength. BoneKEy Reports. 2013;386:1–9.
   Google Scholar