Does unbelted safety requirement affect protection for belted occupants?

References

• Bean JD, Kahane CJ, Mynatt M, Rudd RW, Rush CJ, Wiacek C. Fatalities in Frontal Crashes Despite Seat Belts and Air Bags—Review of All CDS Cases—Model and Calendar Years 2000–2007—122 Fatalities. NHTSA; 2009. DOT HS 811 202.
   Google Scholar
• Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. 2002;6:182–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppinger R, Sun E, Bandak F, et al. Development of Improved Injury Criteria for the Assessment of Advanced Automotive Restraint Systems—II. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg J, Nilsson L. Evaluation of response surface methodologies used in crashworthiness optimization. Int J Impact Eng. 2006;32:759–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu XG, Sun GY, Li GY, Huang XD, Li YC, Li Q. Multiobjective optimization design for vehicle occupant restraint system under frontal impact. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2013;47:465–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallman JJ, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Maiman DJ. Injury differences between small and large overlap frontal crashes. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2011;55:147–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu J, Wu J, Reed M, Klinich K, Cao L. Optimizing the rear seat environment for older children, adults, and infants. Traffic Inj Prev. 2013a;14(Suppl):S13–S22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu J, Wu J, Reed M, Klinich K, Cao L. Rear seat restraint system optimization for older children in frontal crashes. Traffic Inj Prev. 2013b;14:614–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain MF, Barton RR, Joshi SB. Metamodeling: radial basis functions, versus polynomials. Eur J Oper Res. 2002;138:142–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Moderate Overlap Frontal Crashworthiness Evaluation Crash Test Protocol (Version XV). Ruckersville, VA: Author; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kahane C. Fatality Reduction by Air Bags: Analysis of Accident Data through Early 1996. NHTSA, Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation; 1996. Report HS 808 470.
   Google Scholar
• Kahane C. Fatality Reduction by Safety Belts for Front-Seat Occupants of Cars and Light Trucks. Washington, DC: NHTSA, US Department of Transportation; 2000. Report HS 809 199.
   Google Scholar
• Kent R, Trowbridge M, Lopez-Valdes FJ, Ordoyo RH, Segui-Gomez M. How many people are injured and killed as a result of aging? Frailty, fragility, and the elderly risk-exposure tradeoff assessed via a risk saturation model. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2009;53:41–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim TW, Jeong HY. Stochastic analysis of the variation in injury numbers of automobile frontal crash tests. International Journal of Automotive Technology. 2010;11:481–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald DB, Grantham WJ, Tabor WL, Murphy MJ. Global and local optimization using radial basis function response surface models. Appl Math Model. 2007;31:2095–2110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act. Pub L No. 112-141. (2012). H.R. 4348–353: Subtitle B-Enhanced Safety Authorities.
   Google Scholar
• Newgard CD, McConnell KJ. Differences in the effectiveness of frontal air bags by body size among adults involved in motor vehicle crashes. Traffic Inj Prev. 2008;9:432–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and Regulations, Standard No. 208. US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC: Author; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Fourth Report to Congress—Effectiveness of Occupant Protection Systems and Their Use. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, Author; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Fifth/Sixth Report to Congress—Effectiveness of Occupant Protection Systems and Their Use. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, Author; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Laboratory Test Procedure for New Car Assessment Program Frontal Impact Testing. US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC: Author; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Samaha R, Prasad P, Marzougui D, et al. Methodology for Evaluating Fleet Protection (EFP) of New Vehicle Designs: Application to Lightweight Vehicle Designs. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Yang RJ, Wang N, Tho CH, Bobineau JP. Metamodeling development for vehicle frontal impact simulation. J Mech Des. 2005;127:1014–1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou LR, Wang L, Chen L, Ou JP. Structural finite element model updating by using response surfaces and radial basis functions. Advances in Structural Engineering. 2016;19:1446–1462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar