Concept of an enhanced V2X pedestrian collision avoidance system with a cost function–based pedestrian model

References

• Anaya JJ, Merdrignac P, Shagdar O, Nashashibi F, Naranjo JE. Vehicle to pedestrian communications for protection of vulnerable road users. In: 2014 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings. Dearborn, MI: IEEE; 2014:1037–1042.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels B, Erbsmehl CT. Bewegungsverhalten von Fußgängern im Straßenverkehr Teil 1. Berlin: Forschungsvereinigung Automobiltechnik e.V.; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels B, Liers H. Bewegungsverhalten von Fußgängern im Straßenverkehr Teil 2. Berlin: Forschungsvereinigung Automobiltechnik e.V.; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bawaba Al. Honda demonstrates advanced vehicle-to-pedestrian and vehicle-to-motorcycle safety technologies. 2013. Available at: http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Japan+%3A+Honda+Demonstrates+Adv-anced+Vehicle-to-Pedestrian+and…-a0341271396.
   Google Scholar
• Burg H, Moser A. Handbuch Verkehrsunfallrekonstruktion: Unfallaufnahme, Fahrdynamik, Simulation: 2. Aktualisierte Auflage. Wiesbaden, Germany: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, GWV Fachverlage GmbH Wiesbaden; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Burgett A, Srinivasan G, Ranganathan R. A Methodology for Estimating Potential Safety Benefits for Pre-production Driver Assistance Systems. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Carsten OM, Nilsson L. Safety assessment of driver assistance systems. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research. 2001;1:225–243.
   Google Scholar
• Daamen W. Modelling Passenger Flows in Public Transport Facilities. Delft, The Netherlands: DUP Science; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• David K, Flach A, inventors. Method for avoiding collision. US Patent US8547249 B2. March 31, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Eberhardt W, Himbert G. Bewegungsgeschwindigkeiten: Versuchsergebnisse nichtmotorisierter Verkehrsteilnehmer. Verkehrsunfall. 1977;15:79–84.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards M, Nathanson A, Wisch M. Benefit Estimate and Assessment Methodologies for Pre-crash Braking Part of Forward-Looking Integrated Pedestrian Safety Systems. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson. Ericsson Mobility Report: On the Pulse of the Networked Society. Stockholm, Sweden: Author; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Finnis KK, Walton D. Field observation of factors influencing walking speeds. Paper presented at: 2nd International Conference on Sustainability Engineering and Science; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick K, Turner S, Brewer M. Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Fugger TF, Randles BC, Stein AC, Whiting WC, Gallagher B. Analysis of pedestrian gait and perception–reaction at signal-controlled crosswalk intersections. Paper presented at: Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation Research 2000: Safety and Human Performance; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Gates TJ, Noyce DA, Bill AR, van Ee N. Recommended Walking Speeds for Pedestrian Clearance Timing Based on Pedestrian Characteristics. Transportation Research Record, Number 1982; 2006. Report No. 06–1826.
   Google Scholar
• Goh BH, Subramaniam K, Tuck Wai Y, Ali Mohamed A. Pedestrian crossing speed: the case of Malaysia. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering. 2012;2:323–332.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen K, Schulze C, Schlag B. Verkehrssicherheit von schwächeren Verkehrsteilnehmern im Zusammenhang mit dem geringen Geräuschniveau von Fahrzeugen mit alternativen Antrieben. FAT Schriftenreihe. 2012;245.
   Google Scholar
• Hamed MM. Analysis of pedestrians' behavior at pedestrian crossings. Saf Sci. 2001;38:63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield J, Murphy S. The effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behaviour at signalized and unsignalized intersections. Accid Anal Prev. 2007;39:197–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn SP, Bovy P. Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models. Transp Res Part B. 2004;38(2):169–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupfer C. Computergestützte Videobildverarbeitung zur Verkehrssicherheitsarbeit am Beispiel von Fußgängerquerung an städtischen Hauptverkehrsstraßen [dissertation]. Kaiserslautern, Germany: Universität Kaisereslautern; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Kloeden H, Brouwer N, Ries S, Rasshofer RH. Potenzial der Kopfposenerkennung zur Absichtsvorhersage von Fußgängern im urbanen Verkehr. Paper presented at: FAS Workshop Fahrerassistenzsysteme; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch RL, Pietrucha M, Nitzburg M. Field studies of pedestrian walking speed and start-up time. Transp Res Rec. 2007;1538:27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler S, Goldhammer M, Bauer S, et al. Stationary detection of the pedestrian's intention at intersections. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine. 2013;5(4):87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotte J. Pedestrian–truck interactions on crossings for improved pedestrian safety systems. Paper presented at: Grazer Nutzfahrzeug Workshop; May 13, 2016; Graz, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer F, Raddatz M. Das Bewegungsverhalten von Fußgängern im Straßenverkehr auf Basis einer experimentellen Reihenuntersuchung. Verkehrsunfall und Fahrzeugtechnik. 2010;48(12):382–388.
   Google Scholar
• Lehnhoff N. Fußgängerquerverkehr an Querungsstellen. Paper presented at: Seminar der Vereinigung der Straßenbau- und Verkehrsingenieure; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Traffic Safety Facts 2013 Data: Pedestrians. Washington, DC: Author; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Oxley JA, Ihsen E, Fildes BN, Charlton JL, Day RH. Crossing roads safely: an experimental study of age differences in gap selection by pedestrians. Accid Anal Prev. 2005;37:962–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pešić D, Antić B, Glavić D, Milenković M. The effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behaviour at unsignalized intersections—models for predicting unsafe pedestrians behaviour. Saf Sci. 2015;82:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petzoldt T. On the relationship between pedestrian gap acceptance and time to arrival estimates. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;72:127–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudenz K. Drahtlose Kommunikation: GM entwickelt Technik zur Fußgängererkennung. 2012. Available at: http://www.springerpro-fessional.de/drahtlose-kommunikation-gm-entwickelt-technik-zur-fussgaengererkennung–16373/3953272.html
   Google Scholar
• Rahman K, Ghani NA, Kamil AA, Mustafa A. Analysis of pedestrian free flow walking speed in a least developing country: a factorial design study. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology. 4(21):4299–4304.
   Google Scholar
• Rasshofer RH, Schwarz D, Morhart C, Biebl E. Cooperative sensor technology for preventive vulnerable road user protection. Paper presented at: 21st (ESV) International Technical Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Rizos C, Janssen V, Roberts C, Grinter T. PPP versus DGNSS. Geomatics World. 2012;20(6):18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Schnadt H, Schübbe E. Verhalten von Fußgängern an Signalanlagen: Bericht des Technischen Überwachungsverein Rheinland e.V. Köln, Germany: Institut für Unfallforschung; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Shibata N, Sugiyama S, Wada T. Collision avoidance control with steering using velocity potential field. Paper presented at: 2014 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV); Dearborn, MI, June 8–11, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Statistisches Bundesamt. Verkehr: Verkehrsunfälle 2014. Wiesbaden, Germany: 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Themann P, Kotte J, Raudszus D, Eckstein L. Impact of positioning uncertainty of vulnerable road users on risk minimization in collision avoidance systems. Paper presented at: 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV); 2015; Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015: 70/1. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Geneva: Author; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan R, Bain J. Acceleration and Speeds of Young Pedestrians: Phase II. 2000. SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0845.
   Google Scholar
• Wang L, Groves PD, Ziebart M. Urban positioning on a smartphone—real-time shadow matching using GNSS and 3D city models. Inside GNSS. 2013;44–56.
   Google Scholar
• Weidmann U. Transporttechnik der Fußgänger. Transporttechnische Eigenschaften des Fußgängerverkehrs Literaturauswertung. IVT; 1992;90.
   Google Scholar
• Westhofen D, Grundler C, Doll K, Brunsmann U, Zecha S. Transponder- and camera-based advanced driver assistance system. Paper presented at: 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV); 2012; Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2015. Geneva, Switzerland: Author; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Yang X, Huang B, Miao Q. A step-wise algorithm for heading estimation via a smartphone. Paper presented at: IEEE 2016—Control and Decision Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Zebala J, Ciepka P, Reza A. Pedestrian acceleration and speeds. Problems of Forensic Sciences. 2012;91:227–234.
   Google Scholar
• Zecha S, Rasshofer R. Forschungsinitiative Ko-FAS: Neue Perspektiven für die Fahrzeugsicherheit [Research initiative Ko-FAS: New perspectives for vehicle safety]. VDI-Berichte. 2009;2078.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Li Z, Hong J, Han D, Zhao L. Research on characteristics of pedestrian traffic and simulation in the underground transfer hub in Beijing. Paper presented at: Fourth International Conference on Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology; 2009.
   Google Scholar