A spectral power analysis of driving behavior changes during the transition from nondistraction to distraction

References

• Bao S, Flannagan C, Xiong H, Sayer J. Eye glance behavior associated with cell-phone use: examination with naturalistic driving data. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Ann Meet. 2014;58:2112–2116.
   Google Scholar
• Bao S, Guo Z, Flannagan C, Sullivan J, Sayer JR, LeBlanc D. Distracted driving performance measures: spectral power analysis. Transp Res Rec. 2015;2518:68–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco M, Biever WJ, Gallagher JP, Dingus TA. The impact of secondary task cognitive processing demand on driving performance. Accid Anal Prev. 2006;38:895–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigham EO, Brigham EO, Rey Pastor J, et al. The Fast Fourier Transform and Its Applications. 1st ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton SG. Driving while conversing: cell phones that distract and passengers who react. Accid Anal Prev. 2009;41:160–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funkhouser D, Sayer J. Naturalistic census of cell phone use. Transp Res Rec. 2012;2321:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horberry T, Anderson J, Regan MA, Triggs TJ, Brown J. Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. Accid Anal Prev. 2006;38:185–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosking SG, Young KL, Regan MA. The effects of text messaging on young drivers. Hum Factors. 2009;51:582–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer SG, Dingus TA, Neale VL, Sudweeks JD, Ramsey DJ. The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data. Springfield, VA: Virginia Tech Transportation Institute; 2006. DOT HS 810 594.
   Google Scholar
• Libby D, Chaparro A, He J. Distracted while driving—a comparison of the effects of texting and talking on a cell phone. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2013;57:1874–1878.
   Google Scholar
• Mager DE, Abernethy DR. Use of wavelet and fast Fourier transforms in pharmacodynamics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;321:423–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGehee DV, Lee JD, Rizzo M, Dawson J, Bateman K. Quantitative analysis of steering adaptation on a high performance fixed-base driving simulator. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2004;7(3):181–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean JR, Hoffmann ER. The effects of restricted preview on driver steering control and performance. Hum Factors. 1973;15:421–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mixed model. Wikipedia. 2017. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed_model. Accessed April 12, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Visual–manual NHTSA driver distraction guidelines for in-vehicle electronic devices. Fed Regist. 2012;77:11199–11250.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Driver Electronic Device Use in 2014. 2015. Washington, DC. DOT HS 812 197.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Distracted Driving 2014: Traffic Safety Facts Research Note. 2016. Washington, DC. DOT HS 812 260.
   Google Scholar
• Ranney TA, Mazzae E, Garrott R, Goodman MJ. NHTSA driver distraction research: past, present, and future. In: Driver distraction internet forum (Vol. 2000). 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer JR, Buonarosa ML, Bao S, et al. Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems Light-Vehicle Field Operational Test, Methodology and Results Report. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute; 2010. UMTRI-2010-30.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer JR, Devonshire JM, Flannagan CA. The Effects of Secondary Tasks on Naturalistic Driving Performance. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute; 2005. UMTRI-2005-29.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer JR, LeBlanc D, Bogard S, et al. Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems Field Operational Test Final Program Report. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute; 2011. UMTRI-2010-36.
   Google Scholar
• Shinar D, Tractinsky N, Compton R. Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving. Accid Anal Prev. 2005;37:315–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer JD. Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J Educ Behav Stat. 1998;23:323–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayer DL, Johnston WA. Driven to distraction: dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychol Sci. 2001;12:462–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sussman ED, Bishop H, Madnick B, Walter R. Driver inattention and highway safety. Transp Res Rec. 1985;1047:40–48.
   Google Scholar
• Tippey KG, Sivaraj E, Ardoin WJ, Roady T, Ferris TK. Texting while driving using Google Glass: investigating the combined effect of heads-up display and hands-free input on driving safety and performance. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2014;58:2023–2027.
   Google Scholar
• Young K, Regan M, Hammer M. Driver distraction: a review of the literature. In: Distracted Driving. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Australasian College of Road Safety; 2007:379–405.
   Google Scholar