References
- Cattell JM. The influence of the intensity of the stimulus on the length of the reaction time. Brain. 1886;8:512–515.
- Chocholle R. Variation des temps de réaction auditifs en fonction de l'intensité à diverses fréquences [Variation of auditory reaction times as a function of intensity at various frequencies]. Année Psychol. 1940;41:65–124.
- Fastl H, Zwicker E. Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2006.
- Fletcher H, Munson WA. Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. Bell Labs Tech J. 1933;12:377–430.
- Green M. “How long does it take to stop?” Methodological analysis of driver perception–brake times. Transportation Human Factors. 2000;2(3):195–216.
- Heeman PA, Meshorer T, Kun AL, Palinko O, Medenica Z. Estimating cognitive load using pupil diameter during a spoken dialogue task. Paper presented at: 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications; October 28, 2013.
- Hsieh L, Seaman S, Young R. A Surrogate Test for Cognitive Demand: Tactile Detection Response Task (TDRT). SAE International; 2015.
- International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics—Normal Equal-Loudness-Level Contours. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2003. ISO 226.
- International Organization for Standardization. Road Vehicles—Transport Information and Control Systems—Detection–Response Task (DRT) for Assessing Attentional Effects of Cognitive Load in Driving. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2016. ISO 17488.
- Mehler B, Reimer B, Coughlin JF. Sensitivity of physiological measures for detecting systematic variations in cognitive demand from a working memory task: an on-road study across three age groups. Hum Factors. 2012;54:396–412.
- Merat N, Johansson E, Engström J, Chin E, Nathan F, Victor T. Specification of a secondary task to be used in safety assessment of IVIS. Adaptive Integrated Driver–Vehicle Interface. 2007. Available at: http://www.aide-eu.org/pdf/sp2_deliv_new/aide_d2_2_3.pdf
- Nissen MJ. Stimulus intensity and information processing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 1977;22:338–352.
- Piéron H III. Nouvelles recherches sur l'analyse du temps de latence sensorielle et sur la loi qui relie ce temps à l'intensité d'excitation [Further evidence on the laws of sensory processing time as a function of excitatory intensity]. Année Psychol. 1920;22:58–142.
- Stojmenova K, Jakus G, Sodnik J. Sensitivity evaluation of the visual, tactile, and auditory detection response task method while driving. Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;18:431–436.