Young females' attention toward road safety images: An ERP study of the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory

References

• Balconi M, Falbo L, Brambilla E. BIS/BAS responses to emotional cues: self-report, autonomic measure and alpha band modulation. Pers Individ Diff. 2009;47:858–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balconi M, Mazza G. Lateralisation effect in comprehension of emotional facial expressions: a comparison between EEG alpha band power and behavioural inhibition (BIS) and activation (BAS) systems. Brain Cogn. 2010;15:361–384.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Economics. Road Deaths Australia: 2016 Statistical Summary. 2017. Available at: https://bitre.gov.au/publications/ongoing/files/Road_Trauma_Australia_2016_Web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Castellá J, Pérez J. Sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward and traffic violations. Accid Anal Prev. 2004;36:947–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corr P, ed. The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Corr P, Cooper A. The Corr-Cooper Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ): Development and Validation. 2013. Available at: http://www.philipcorr.net/uploads/downloads/153.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Corr P, Mutinelli S. Motivation and young people's career planning: a perspective from the reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. Pers Indivod Diff. 2017;106:126–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coull J. Neural correlates of attention and arousal: insights from electrophysiological, functional neuroimaging and psychopharmacology. Prog Neurobiol. 1998;55:343–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCoster J. Data analysis in SPSS. 2004. Available at: http://www.stat-help.com/notes.html.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan R, Henley N. Negative outcomes, threats and threat appeals: Widening the conceptual framework for the study of fear and other emotions in social marketing communications. SMQ. 1997;4:56–67.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan C, Barry R, Connolly J, et al. Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:1883–1908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenbeld C, Twisk D, Houwing S. Effects of persuasive communication and group discussions on acceptability of anti-speeding policies for male and female drivers. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2008;11:207–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray J, McNaughton N. The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: An Enquiry into the Functions of the Septo Hippocampal System. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Harbeck E, Glendon I. How reinforcement sensitivity and perceived risk influence young drivers' reported engagement in risky driving behaviours. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;54:73–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon-Jones E, Peterson C. Effect of trait and state approach motivation on aggressive inclinations. J Res Pers. 2008;42:1381–1385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings G, Stead M, Webb J. Fear appeals in social marketing: strategic and ethical reasons for concern. Psychol Mark. 2004;21:961–986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesper H. Report of the Committee on Methods of Clinical Examination in Electroencephalography. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1958;10:370–375.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye S-A, Lewis I, Algie J, White M. Young drivers' response to anti-speeding advertisements: comparison of self-report and objective measures of persuasive processing and outcomes. Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17:352–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye S-A, White M, Lewis I. Individual differences in drivers' cognitive processing of road safety messages. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;50:272–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye S-A, White M, Lewis I. The use of neurocognitive methods in assessing health communication messages: a systematic review. J Health Psychol. 2016;50:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kessels L, Ruiter R, Jansma B. Increased attention but more efficient disengagement. Neuroscientific evidence for defensive processing of threatening health information. Health Psychol. 2010;29:346–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis I, Watson B, Tay R. Examining the effectiveness of physical threats in road safety advertising: the role of the third-person effect, gender, and age. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2007;10:48–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis I, Watson B, White K. An examination of message-relevant affect in road safety messages: should road safety advertisements aim to make us feel good or bad? Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2008;11:403–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck S. An Introduction to Event-Related Potential Technique. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Petty R, Cacioppo J. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 1986;19:123–205.
   Google Scholar
• Voigt D, Dillard J, Braddock K, Anderson J, Sopory P, Stephenson M. Carver and White's (1994) BIS/BAS scales and their relationship to risky health behaviours. Pers Individ Diff. 2009;47:89–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar