The influence of child restraint lower attachment method on protection offered by forward facing child restraint systems in oblique loading conditions

References

• Arbogast KB, Ghati Y, Menon RA, Tylko S, Tamborra N, Morgan RM. Field investigation of child restraints in side impact crashes. Traffic Inj Prev. 2005;6:351–360.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arbogast KB, Locey CM, Zonfrillo MR, Maltese MR. Protection of children restrained in child safety seats in side impact crashes. J Trauma. 2010;69:913–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilston LE, Brown J, Kelly P. Improved protection for children in forward-facing restraints during side impacts. Traffic Inj Prev. 2005;6:135–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown J, Griffiths M, Paine M. Effectiveness of child restraints: the Australian experience. Australian New Car Assessment Program; 2002. Research Report 06/02.
   Google Scholar
• Brown J, Kelly P, Griffiths M. A Comparison of Alternative Anchorage Systems for Child Restraints in Side Impacts. Detroit, MI: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1997. SAE Technical Paper. No. 973303.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton JL, Fildes B, Laemmle R, Smith S, Douglas F. A preliminary evaluation of child restraints and anchorage systems for an Australian car. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2004;48:73–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charlton JL, Fildes B, Taranto D, et al. Performance of booster seats in side impacts: effect of adjacent passengers and ISOFIX attachment. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2007;51:155–167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DOT. National Child Passenger Safety Certification Training. DOT HS 810 731. April 2007 (R10/10). Washington DC; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• European New Car Assessment Programme. Assessment Protocol—Child Occupant Protection. Brussels, Belgium; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hauschild HW, Humm JR, Pintar FA, et al. The influence of enhanced side impact protection on kinematics and injury measures of far- or center-seated children in forward-facing child restraints. Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(Suppl 2):S9–S15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauschild HW, Humm JR, Pintar FA, et al. Protection of children in child restraint systems in oblique impacts: relative motion of the child and child restraint. Paper presented at: 25th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); 2017; Detroit, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Hauschild HW, Humm JR, Pintar FA, et al. Protection of children in forward-facing child restraint systems during oblique side impact sled tests: intrusion and tether effects. Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17(Suppl 1):156–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntley M. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 213 Child Restraint Systems. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Jermakian JS, Wells JK. Observed use of tethers in forward-facing child restraint systems. Inj Prev. 2011;17:371–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoor T, Altenhof W, Snowdon A, et al. A numerical investigation into the effect of CRS misuse on the injury potential of children in frontal and side impact crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43:1438–1450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinich KD, Ritchie NL, Manary MA, Reed MP, Tamborra N, Schneider LW. Kinematics of the Q3S ATD in a child restraint under far-side impact loading. In: Proceedings: International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2005. Paper 05-0262.
   Google Scholar
• Maltese MR, Locey CM, Jermakian JS, Nance ML, Arbogast KB. Injury causation scenarios in belt-restrained nearside child occupants. Stapp Car Crash J. 2007;51:299–311.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCray L, Scarboro M, Brewer J. Injuries to children one to three years old in side impact crashes. Paper presented at: 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); 2007; Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Mertz HJ, Irwin AL, Prasad P. Biomechanical and scaling bases for frontal and side impact injury assessment reference values. Stapp Car Crash J. 2003;47:155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NHTSA. Laboratory Test Procedure for Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards 213 Child Restraint Systems. Washington, DC.: DOT; 2014a.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Notice of Proposed Rule Making. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Child Restraint Systems—Side Impact Protection. Washington, DC: Author; 2014b. 49CFR Part 571 Docket No. NHTSA-2014-0012.
   Google Scholar
• O'Neil J, Bull MJ, Talty J, Slaven JE. Important child occupant safety trends, Indiana between 2005 and 2010. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010;55:27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Orzechowski KM, Edgerton EA, Bulas DI, McLaughlin PM, Eichelberger MR. Patterns of injury to restrained children in side impact motor vehicle crashes: the side impact syndrome. J Trauma. 2003;54:1094–1101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwood CP, Ferguson SA, Crandall JR. Factors leading to crash fatalities to children in child restraints. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2003;47:343–359.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sherwood CP, Marshall R, Crandall JR. The development of an injury cost function for child passenger safety. Paper presented at: 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); 2007; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Society of Automotive Engineers. Instrumentation for Impact Test, Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice. Troy, MI: Author; 2014. SAE J211-1.
   Google Scholar
• Starnes M, Eigen AM. Fatalities and Injuries to 0–8 Year Old Passenger Vehicle Occupants Bases on Impact Attributes. Washington DC.: DOT; 2002. No. DOT HS 809 410.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan LK, Louden AE. NHTSA's initial evaluation of child side impact test procedures. In: Proceedings: International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2009. Paper 09-0539.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan LK, Louden AE, Echemendia CG. NHTSA'S Evaluation of a Potential Child Side Impact Test Procedure. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2011. Paper Number 11–0227.
   Google Scholar