Analysis of mechanics of side impact test defined in UN/ECE Regulation 129

References

• Arbogast KB. A public health priority for only ten percent of the car occupant population: why focus on children and how are they different biomechanically? In: Proceedings of the International IRCOBI Conference on the Biokinetics of Impact. Berlin, Germany, September 10–12, 2014. 2014:1–14. Available at: http://www.ircobi.org/wordpress/downloads/irc14/pdf_files/01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Arbogast KB, Chen I, Durbin DR, Winston FK. Injury risks for children in child restraint systems in side impact crashes. In: Proceedings of the International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact. Graz, Austria, September 22–24, 2004. 2004:25–36. Available at: http://www.ircobi.org/wordpress/downloads/irc0111/2004/Session1/1.2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Arbogast KB, Ghati Y, Menon RA, Tylko S, Tamborra N, Morgan MR. Field investigation of child restraints in side impact crashes. Traffic Inj Prev. 2005;6:351–360.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arbogast KB, Locey CM, Zonfrillo MR, Maltese MR. Protection of children restrained in child safety seats in side impact crashes. J Trauma. 2010;69:913–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranowski P, Damaziak K, Malachowski J, Mazurkiewicz L, Muszynski A. A child seat numerical model validation in the static and dynamic work conditions. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2014;15(2):361–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilston LE, Brown J, Kelly P. Improved protection for children in forward-facing restraints during side impacts. Traffic Inj Prev. 2005;6(2):135–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlson M, Rurleigh M, Barnes A, Waagmeester K, van Ratingen M. Q3s 3 year old side impact dummy development. Paper presented at: 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Desapriya E, Samayawardhena L, Somasiri A, Pike I. Child occupants and side-impact crashes: commentary. J Emerg Nurs. 2011;37:391–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppinger R, Sun E, Kuppa S, Saul R. Development of Improved Injury Criteria for the Assessment of Advanced Automotive Restraint Systems—II. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Fu S, Kleessen C, Zhou Z, Koschdlo K, Kant R. Development of advanced finite element models of Q child crash test dummies. In: Proceedings from the 8th European LS-DYNA Users Conference. Strasbourg, France, May 23–24, 2011. Livermore, CA: Livermore Publishing House; 2011:1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hallquist JO. LS-Dyna Theory Manual. Livermore: Livermore Publishing House; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hauschild HW, Humm JR, Pintar FA, et al. Protection of children in forward-facing child restraint systems during oblique side impact sled tests: intrusion and tether effects. Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17(Suppl 1):156–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard A, Rothman L, Moses McKeag A, et al. Children in side-impact motor vehicle crashes: seating positions and injury mechanisms. J Trauma. 2004;56:1276–1285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Initiative for the Global Harmonisation of Accident Data (iGlad). iGlad: Initiative for the Global Harmonisation of Accident Data. 2017. Available at: http://www.iglad.net/web/page.aspx?sid=10771. Accessed December 11, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin AL, Mertz HJ. Guidelines for assessing the biofidelity of side impact dummies of various sizes and ages. In: Proceedings of 46st Stapp Crash Conference. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 2014:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Jermakian JS, Klinich KD, Orton NR, et al. Factors affecting tether use and correct use in child restraint installations. J Safety Res. 2014;51:99–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannsen H, Dendjellal F, Renaudin F, Claeson P. Update on lateral impact test procedure for child restraint systems. In: Proceedings from the 22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). Washington, D.C., USA, June 13–16, 2011. NHTSA; 2011:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kapoor T, Altenhof W, Howard A, Rasico J, Zhu F. Methods to mitigate injury to toddlers in near-side impact crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40:180–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppel S, Muir C, Budd L, et al. Parents' attitudes, knowledge and behaviors relating to safe child occupant travel. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;51:18–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Zhang W, Kapoor T, Altenhof W. Crash analysis of a three-year-old human child model in side impacts considering normal and incorrect CRS usage. Int J Crashworthiness. 2011;4:457–467.
   Google Scholar
• Maltese MR, Locey CM, Jermakian JS, Nance ML, Arbogast KB. Injury causation scenarios in belt-restrained nearside child occupants. Stapp Car Crash J. 2007;51:299–311.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muszynski A. Modeling and Testing of the Child Restraint System in Terms of Reducing the Dynamic Loads Acting on the Child Body during an Accident [PhD dissertation]. Warsaw, Poland: Military University of Technology; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Nagabhushana V, Morgan R, Kan C, Park J, Kuznetsov A. Impact Risk for 1–8 Year-Old Children on the Struck Side in a Lateral Crash. 2007. Paper presented at: SAE Government Industry Meeting; DOT HS 810 699.
   Google Scholar
• Naumann RB, Dellinger AM, Zaloshnja E, Lawrence BA, Miller TR. Incidence and total lifetime costs of motor vehicle–related fatal and nonfatal injury by road user type, United States, 2005. Traffic Inj Prev. 2010;11:353–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: 49 CFR Part 571 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Child Restraint Systems—Side Impact Protection. NHTSA; 2014a. Docket No. NHTSA-2014-0012, RIN 2127-AK95.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Traffic Safety Facts. U.S. Department of Transportation; 2014b. DOT HS 812 261.
   Google Scholar
• Paine M, Griffiths M, Brown J, Case M, Johnstone O. Protecting children in car crashes: the Australian experience. In: Proceedings from the 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). Nagoya, Japan, May 19–22, 2003. 2003:1–15. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.915.7651&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ryoichi Y, Okada H, Nomura M, et al. Identification of head injury mechanisms of a child occupant in a child restraint system based on side impact tests. In: Proceedings from the 22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). Washington, D.C., USA, June 13–16, 2011. 2011:1–14. Paper No. 11-0066-O. Available at: https://www-esv.nhtsa.dot.gov/Proceedings/22/files/22ESV-000066.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sherwood C, Crandall JR, Ferguson S. Factors leading to crash fatalities to children placed in child restraints. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2003;47:343–359.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skjerven-Martinsen M, Naess PA, Hansen TB, Staff T, Stray-Pedersen A. Observational study of child restraining practice on Norwegian high-speed roads: restraint misuse poses a major threat to child passenger safety. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;59:479–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. Major Causes of Death. 2013. Available at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan LK, Louden AE. NHTSA's initial evaluation of child side impact test procedures. Paper presented at: International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan LK, Louden AE, Echemendia CG. NHTSA'S Evaluation of a Potential Child Side Impact Test Procedure. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2011. Paper Number 11–0227.
   Google Scholar
• Suratno B, Job S, Leavy D, et al. The Australian Child Restraint Evaluation Program. In: Faulks IJ, Irwin JD, eds. Proceedings of an International Conference Held in Parliament House, Macquarie Street, Sydney, New South Wales 2–3 August 2007. Wahroonga, NSW, Australia: Safety and Policy Analysis International; 2008:445–477. Report SPAI 2007–24/1.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations and Economic Commission for Europe. Regulation No. 44 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE)—Uniform provisions concerning the approval of restraining devices for child occupants of power-driven vehicles (“Child Restraint Systems”). Official Journal of the European Union. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations and Economic Commission for Europe. Regulation No. 129 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE)—uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used on board of motor vehicles (ECRS). Official Journal of the European Union. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. European Status Report on Road Safety. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2009.
   Google Scholar