An evaluation of the real-world safety effect of a lane change driver support system and characteristics of lane change crashes based on insurance claims data

References

• Anderson RWG, Hutchinson TP, Linke B, Ponte G. Analysis of Crash Data to Estimate the Benefits of Emerging Vehicle Technology. Adelaide, Australia: Centre for Automotive Safety Research, University of Adelaide; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bascunana J. Analysis of Lane Change Crash Avoidance. 1995. SAE Technical Paper 951895. DOI:10.4271/951895
   Google Scholar
• Chovan JD, Tijerina L, Alexander G, Hendricks DL. Examination of Lane Change Crashes and Potential IVHS Countermeasures. Washington, DC: NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation; 1994. Report No: DOT HS-808-071.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchino J. Effects of Blind Spot Monitoring Systems on Police-Reported Lane-Change Crashes. Arlington, VA: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle M, Edwards A, Avery M. AEB real world validation using UK motor insurance claims data. Paper presented at: 24th ESV Conference; 2015; Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• euroFOT. European Large-Scale Field Operational Tests on In-Vehicle Systems 7th Framework Programme. Information and Communication Technologies. Deliverable 6.4 Final Results: Impacts on Traffic Safety. 2012. Available at: http://www.eurofot-ip.eu/
   Google Scholar
• Farmer CM. Crash Avoidance Potential of Five Vehicle Technologies. Arlington, VA: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Fitch GM, Lee SE, Klauer S, Hankey J, Sudweeks J, Dingus T. Analysis of Lane-Change Crashes and Near-Crashes. Washington, DC: NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation; 2009. Report No: DOT HS 811 147.
   Google Scholar
• Flannagan C, LeBlanc D, Bogard S, et al. Large-Scale Field Test of Forward Collision Alert and Lane Departure Warning Systems. Washington, DC: NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation; 2016. Technical Report No: DOT HS 812 247.
   Google Scholar
• Hetrick S. Examination of Driver Lane Change Behavior and the Potential Effectiveness of Warning Onset Rules for Lane Change or “Side” Crash Avoidance Systems [MSc thesis]. Blacksburg, VA: Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Highway Loss Data Institute. Volvo City safety loss experience—initial results. HLDI Bull. 2011;28(6).
   Google Scholar
• Highway Loss Data Institute. Volvo collision avoidance features: initial results. HLDI Bull. 2012;29(5)
   Google Scholar
• Highway Loss Data Institute. Volvo City safety loss experience—a long-term update. HLDI Bull. 2015;32(1).
   Google Scholar
• Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. More good news about crash avoidance. Status Report. 2013;48(3).
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson-Hellman I, Lindman M. The effect of a low-speed automatic brake system estimated from real life data. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:104–111.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson-Hellman I, Lindman M. Evaluation of rear-end collision avoidance technologies based on real world crash data. Paper presented at: 3rd International Symposium on Future Active Safety Technology towards Zero Traffic Accidents; 2015a; Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson-Hellman I, Lindman M. Real-world performance of city safety based on Swedish insurance data. Paper presented at: 24th ESV Conference; 2015b; Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson-Hellman I, Lindman M. Evaluation of the crash mitigation effect of low-speed automated emergency braking systems based on insurance claims data. Traffic Inj Prev. 2016a;17:42–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson-Hellman I, Lindman M. Using insurance claims data to evaluate the collision avoidance and crash-mitigating effect of CWB+ACC. Paper presented at: Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV); 2016b; Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Jermakian JS. Crash avoidance potential of four passenger vehicle technologies. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43:732–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jula H, Kosmatopoulos EB, Ioannou PA. Collision avoidance analysis for lane changing and merging. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. 2000;49:2295–2308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehn M, Hummel T, Bende J. Benefit estimation of advanced driver assistance systems for cars derived from real-live accidents. Paper presented at: 21st International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles; June 15–18, 2009; Stuttgart, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SE, Olsen ECB, Wierwille W. A Comprehensive Examination of Naturalistic Lane-Changes. Washington, DC: NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation; 2004. Report No: DOT HS 809 702.
   Google Scholar
• Lindman M, Isaksson-Hellman I, Strandroth J. Basic numbers needed for understanding the traffic safety effect of automated cars. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference on Biomechanics of Impacts; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Traffic Safety Facts 2014. Washington, DC: NHTSA. U.S. Department of Transportation; 2016. Report No: DOT HS 812 261.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Traffic Safety Facts 2015. Washington, DC: NHTSA. U.S. Department of Transportation; 2017. Report No: DOT HS 812 384.
   Google Scholar
• Nodine E, Lam A, Stevens S, Razo M, Najm W. Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems (IVBSS) Light Vehicle Field Operational Test Independent Evaluation. Washington, DC: NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation; 2011. Final Report No: DOT HS 811 516.
   Google Scholar
• Piccinini GF, Simões A, Rodrigues CM, Leitão M. A method to investigate drivers’ acceptance of Blind Spot Detection System®. Work. 2012;41:4213–4217.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SAS Institute. PROC GENMOD. SAS: Statistical Software [computer program]. Version 9.4. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. Available at: https://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63033/HTML/default/viewer.htm#genmod_toc.htm. Accessed January 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer J, Bogard S, Buonarosa M, et al. Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems Light-Vehicle Field Operational Test Key Findings Report. Washington, DC: NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation; 2011. Report No: DOT HS 811 416.
   Google Scholar
• Sen B, Smith JD, Najm WG. Analysis of Lane Change Crashes. Washington, DC: NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003. Report No: DOT HS 809 571.
   Google Scholar
• Trafikanalys [Road Traffic Injuries] 2014. Available at: http://www.trafa.se www.trafa.se/vagtrafik/vagtrafikskador/. Accessed January 20, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Young S, Eberhard C, Moffa P. Development of Performance Specifications for Collision Avoidance Systems for Lane Change Merging and Backing, Task 2 Interim Report: Functional Goals Establishment. Washington, DC: NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation; 1995.
   Google Scholar