Injury risk functions based on population-based finite element model responses: Application to femurs under dynamic three-point bending

References

• Besl P, McKay N. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. In: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 1992;14:239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan R, Mohan PS, Hopkins A, Galloway F, Taylor M, Nair PB. Statistical modelling of the whole human femur incorporating geometric and material properties. Appendix I. Med Eng Phys. 2010;32:161–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstein AH, Reilly DT, Martens M, Joint JB, Am S. Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:82–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh JM, Walilko TJ, Malhotra A, Zhu Y, King AI. Biomechanical Response and Injury Tolerance of the Thorax in Twelve Sled Side Impacts. 1990. SAE Technical Paper 902307.
   Google Scholar
• Crandall JR, Bose D, Forman J, et al. Human surrogates for injury biomechanics research. Clin Anat. 2011;24:362–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutcliffe HC, Schmidt AL, Lucas JE, Bass CR. How few? Bayesian statistics in injury biomechanics. Stapp Car Crash J. 2012;56:349–386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davies R, Twining C, Taylor C. Statistical Models of Shape: Optimisation and Evaluation. Verlag London: Springer; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Eppinger R, Marcus J, Morgan R. Development of Dummy and Injury Index for NHTSAs Thoracic Side Impact Protection Research Program. 1984. SAE Technical Paper 840885.
   Google Scholar
• Forman JL, del Pozo de Dios E, Symeonidis I, et al. Fracture Tolerance Related to Skeletal Development and Aging Throughout Life: 3‐Point Bending of Human Femurs. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Forman JL, Kent RW, Mroz K, Pipkorn B, Bostrom O, Segui-Gomez M. Predicting rib fracture risk with whole-body finite element models: development and preliminary evaluation of a probabilistic analytical framework. Paper presented at: 56th AAAM Annual Conference; 2012; Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Funk JR, Kerrigan JR, Crandall JR. Dynamic bending tolerance and elastic-plastic material properties of the human femur. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2004;48:215–233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemper AR, Mcnally C, Kennedy E, Manoogian S, Tech V, Forest W, Biomechanics I. The material properties of human tibia cortical bone. Biomed Sci Instrum. 2008;44:419–427.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemper AR, McNally C, Pullins CA, Freeman LJ, Duma SM, Rouhana SM. The biomechanics of human ribs: material and structural properties from dynamic tension and bending tests. Stapp Car Crash J. 2007;51:235–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kent RW, Funk JR. Data censoring and parametric distribution assignment in the development of injury risk functions from biomechanical data. Biomech Eng. 2004;2004(724):1.
   Google Scholar
• Kent RW, Lopez-Valdes FJ, Dennis NJ, et al. Assessment of a three-point restraint system with a pre-tensioned lap belt and an inflatable, force-limited shoulder belt. Stapp Car Crash J. 2011;55:141–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kerrigan JR, Drinkwater DC, Kam CY, et al. Tolerance of the human leg and thigh in dynamic latero-medial bending. Int J Crashworthiness. 2004;9:607–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein KF, Hu J, Reed MP, Hoff CN, Rupp JD. Development and validation of statistical models of femur geometry for use with parametric finite element models. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015;43:2503–2514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein KF, Hu J, Reed MP, et al. Validation of a parametric finite element human femur model. Traffic Inj Prev. 2017;18:420–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuppa S. Injury Criteria for Side Impact. Washington, DC: National Transportation Biomechanics Research Center, National Highway Safety Administration; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Livermore Software Technology Corporation. LS-DYNA Keyword User's Manual. Ver. 971. Livermore CA: LSTC; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• McCalden RW, McGeough JA, Barker MB, Court-Brown CM. Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1193–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertz H. A Procedure for Normalizing Impact Response Data. 1984; SAE Technical Paper 840884.
   Google Scholar
• Nie B, Kim T, Wang Y, Bollapragada V, Daniel T, Crandall JR. Comparison of two scaling approaches for the development of biomechanical multi-body human models. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2016;38:297–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park G, Kim T, Forman J, Panzer MB, Crandall JR. Prediction of the structural response of the femoral shaft under dynamic bending loading using subject-specific finite element models. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2017;11:1151–1166.
   Google Scholar
• Rohr K, Stiehl HS, Sprengel R, Buzug TM, Weese J, Kuhn MH. Landmark-based elastic registration using approximating thin-plate splines. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20:526–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Arun MWJ, Pintar FA. Normalizing and scaling of data to derive human response corridors from impact tests. J Biomech. 2014;47:1749–1756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zioupos P. Ageing human bone: factors affecting its biomechanical properties and the role of collagen. J Biomater Appl. 2001;15(3):187–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar