488
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evaluation of geometrically personalized THUMS pedestrian model response against sedan–pedestrian PMHS impact test data

, , , &
Pages 542-548 | Received 22 Aug 2017, Accepted 07 Mar 2018, Published online: 03 May 2018

References

  • Arnoux PJ, Behr M, Llari M, Thollon L, Brunet C. Injury criteria implementation and evaluation in FE models applications to lower limb segments. Int J Crashworthiness. 2008;13:653–665.
  • Banglmaier RF, Dvoracek-Driksna D, Oniang'o TE, Haut RC. Axial Compressive load response of the 90 flexed human tibiofemoral joint. Stapp Car Crash J. 1999;43:1–13.
  • Bass CR, Lucas SR, Salzar RS, et al. Failure properties of cervical spinal ligaments under fast strain rate deformations. Spine. 2007;32:7–13.
  • Chen H, Fu LX, Zheng HY. A comparative study between China and IHRA for the vehicle–pedestrian impact. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Mechanical Systems. 2009;2:1108–1115.
  • Chen H, Poulard D, Crandall JR, Panzer MB. Pedestrian response with different initial positions during impact with a mid-sized sedan. Paper presented at: 24th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); 2015; Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Forman JL, Joodaki H, Forghani A, et al. The effects of axial preload and dorsiflexion on the tolerance of the ankle/subtalar joint to dynamic inversion and eversion. Stapp Car Crash J. 2002;46:245–265.
  • Funk JR, Srinivasan SC, Crandall JR, et al. The effects of axial preload and dorsiflexion on the tolerance of the ankle/subtalar joint to dynamic inversion and eversion. Stapp Car Crash J. 2002;46:245–265.
  • Gehre C, Gades H, Wernicke P. Objective rating of signals using test and simulation responses. Paper presented at: 21st ESV Conference; 2009; Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Golman AJ, Danelson KA, Miller LE, Stitzel JD. Injury prediction in a side impact crash using human body model simulation. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;64:1–8.
  • Gunji Y, Okamoto M, Takahashi Y. Examination of human body mass influence on pedestrian pelvis injury prediction using a human FE model. Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury Conference. 2012;40:316–327.
  • Han Y, Yang J, Mizuno K, Matsui Y. Effects of vehicle impact velocity, vehicle front-end shapes on pedestrian injury risk. Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13:507–518.
  • Ivarsson J, Lesley D, Kerrigan J, et al. Dynamic response corridors and injury thresholds of the pedestrian lower extremities. In: Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury Conference. 2004;32:179–191.
  • Iwamoto M, Kisanuki Y, Watanabe I, Furusu K, Miki K, Hasegawa J. Development of a finite element model of the Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS) and application to injury reconstruction. Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury Conference. 2002;30:1–12.
  • Kent R, Patrie J. Chest deflection tolerance to blunt anterior loading is sensitive to age but not load distribution. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;149(2):121–128.
  • Kerrigan JR, Arregui-Dalmases C, Foster J, Crandall JR, Rizzo A. Pedestrian injury analysis: field data vs. laboratory experiments. Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury Conference. 2012;40:672–689.
  • Kerrigan JR, Crandall JR, Deng B. Pedestrian kinematic response to mid-sized vehicle impact. Int J Veh Saf. 2007;2(3):221–240.
  • Kerrigan JR, Drinkwater DC, Kam CY, et al. Tolerance of the human leg and thigh in dynamic latero-medial bending. Int J Crashworthiness. 2004;9:607–623.
  • Kuppa S. Injury Criteria for Side Impact Dummies. Washington, DC: National Transportation Biomechanics Research Center, NHTSA; 2004.
  • Kuppa S, Eppinger RH, McKoy F, Nguyen T, Pintar FA, Yoganandan N. Development of side impact thoracic injury criteria and their application to the modified ES-2 dummy with rib extensions (ES-2re). Stapp Car Crash J. 2003;47:189–210.
  • Li Z, Kindig MW, Kerrigan JR, Kent RW, Crandall JR. Development and validation of a subject-specific finite element model of a human clavicle. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2013;16:819–829.
  • Maeno T, Hasegawa J. Development of a finite element model of the Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS) and application to carpedestrian impacts. Paper presented at: 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); 2001; Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Meyer EG, Wei F, Button K, Powell JW, Haut RC. Determination of ligament strain during high ankle sprains due to excessive external foot rotation in sports. In: Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury Conference. 2012;40:277–288.
  • Mo F, Arnoux PJ, Cesari D, Masson C. Investigation of the injury threshold of knee ligaments by the parametric study of car–pedestrian impact conditions. Saf Sci. 2014;62:58–67.
  • Naci H, Chisholm D, Baker TD. Distribution of road traffic deaths by road user group: a global comparison. Inj Prev. 2009;15:55–59.
  • Paas R, Davidsson J, Brolin K. Head kinematics and shoulder biomechanics in shoulder impacts similar to pedestrian crashes—a THUMS study. Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16:498–506.
  • Paas R, Davidsson J, Masson C, Sander U, Brolin K, Yang JK. Pedestrian shoulder and spine kinematics in full-scale PMHS tests for human body model evaluation. In: Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury Conference. 2012;40:730–750.
  • Paas R, Masson C, Davidsson J. Head boundary conditions in pedestrian crashes with passenger cars: six-degrees-of-freedom post-mortem human subject responses. Int J Crashworthiness. 2015;20:547–559.
  • Park G, Kim T, Forman J, Panzer MB, Crandall JR. Prediction of the structural response of the femoral shaft under dynamic loading using subject-specific finite element models. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2017;20:1151–1166.
  • Pędzisz M, Dziewoński T. Development of 5th and 95th scaled occupant thorax model. Influence of reference anthropometry data and kriging parameters on rib‐cage shape and FE model dynamic response. Paper presented at: International Crashworthiness Conference; 2012; Milan, Italy.
  • Poulard D, Chen H, Crandall JR, Dziewonski T, Pedzisz M, Panzer MB. Component-level biofidelity assessment of morphed pedestrian finite element models. In: Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury Conference. 2015;43:577–593.
  • Poulard D, Chen H, Panzer MB. Geometrical personalization of pedestrian impact kinematics. Paper presented at: SAE 2016 World Congress and Exhibition. Detriot, Michigan. 2016. SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1506.
  • Poulard D, Subit D, Donlon JP, Kent RW. Development of a computational framework to adjust the pre-impact spine posture of a whole-body model based on cadaver tests data. J Biomech. 2015;48:636–643.
  • Quinn KP, Winkelstein BA. Cervical facet capsular ligament yield defines the threshold for injury and persistent joint-mediated neck pain. J Biomech. 2007;40:2299–2306.
  • Shim VB, Fernandez JW, Gamage PB, et al. Subject-specific finite element analysis to characterize the influence of geometry and material properties in Achilles tendon rupture. J Biomech. 2014;47:3598–3604.
  • Simms C, Wood D. Pedestrian and cyclist impact: a biomechanical perspective. Netherlands: Springer; 2009.
  • Snedeker JG, Muser MH, Walz FH. Assessment of pelvis and upper leg injury risk in car–pedestrian collisions: comparison of accident statistics, impactor tests and a human body finite element model. Stapp Car Crash J. 2003;47:437–457.
  • Snedeker JG, Walz FH, Muser MH, Lanz C, Schroeder G. Assessing femur and pelvis injury risk in car–pedestrian collisions: comparison of full body PMTO impacts, and a human body finite element model. Paper presented at: 19th International Technical of Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); 2005; Lyon, France.
  • Subit D, Kerrigan J, Crandall JR, et al. Pedestrian–vehicle interaction: kinematics and injury analysis of four full scale tests. Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury Conference. 2008;36:275–294.
  • Toyota Motor Corporation. THUMS Users Manual Version 4.0. Toyko, Japan: Toyota Motor Corporation; 2011.
  • Trajkovski A, Omerović S, Hribernik M, Prebil I. Failure properties and damage of cervical spine ligaments, experiments and modeling. J Biomech Eng. 2014;136(3):031002.
  • Vavalle NA, Jelen BC, Moreno DP, Stitzel JD, Gayzik FS. An evaluation of objective rating methods for full-body finite element model comparison to PMHS tests. Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(Suppl 1):S87–S94.
  • Watanabe R, Katsuhara T, Miyazaki H, Kitagawa Y, Yasuki T. Research of the relationship of pedestrian injury to collision speed, car-type, impact location and pedestrian sizes using human FE model (THUMS Version 4). Stapp Car Crash J. 2012;56:269–321.
  • Wu T, Kim T, Bollapragada V, et al. Evaluation of biofidelity of THUMS pedestrian model under a whole-body impact conditions with a generic sedan buck. Traffic Inj Prev. 2017;18(Suppl 1):S148–S154.
  • Yasuki T, Yamamae Y. Validation of kinematics and lower extremity injuries estimated by Total Human Model for Safety in SUV to pedestrian impact test. J Biomech Sci Eng. 2010;5:340–356.
  • Zhang Q, Kindig M, Li Z, Crandall JR, Kerrigan JR. Development of structural and material clavicle response corridors under axial compression and three point bending loading for clavicle finite element model validation. J Biomech. 2014;47:2563–2570.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.