AEB effectiveness evaluation based on car-to-cyclist accident reconstructions using video of drive recorder

References

• Edwards M, Nathanson A, Carroll J, Wisch M, Zander O, Lubbe N. Assessment of integrated pedestrian protection systems with autonomous emergency braking (AEB) and passive safety components. Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(Suppl 1):S2–S11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards M, Nathanson A, Wisch M. Estimate of potential benefit for Europe of fitting autonomous emergency braking (AEB) systems for pedestrian protection to passenger cars. Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(Suppl. 1):S173–S182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erbsmehl C. Simulation of real crashes as a method for estimation. Paper presented at: International Technical Conference on the Enhanced-Safety of Vehicles; June 15–18, 2009; Stuttgart, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Euro NCAP. Test Protocol—AEB VRU Systems Version 2.0.2. 2017. Available from: https://www.euroncap.com/en/for-engineers/protocols/vulnerable-road-user-vru-protection/
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson R, Ranjbar A, Rosén E. Integrated bicyclist protection systems—potential of head injury reduction combining passive and active protection systems. Paper presented at: 24th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); June 8–11, 2015; Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Guo F, Klauer G, Hankey M, Dingus A. Near crashes as crash surrogate for naturalistic driving studies. Transp Res Rec. 2010;2147:66–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habibovic A, Tivesten E, Uchida N, Bärgman J, Ljung Aust M. Driver behavior in car-to-pedestrian incidents: an application of the driving reliability and error analysis method (DREAM). Accid Anal Prev. 2013;50:554–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Y, Li Q, He W, et al. Analysis of vulnerable road user kinematics before/during/after vehicle collisions based on video records. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 13–15, 2017; Antwerp, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Ito D, Hayakawa K, Kond Y, et al. Difference between car-to-cyclist crash and near crash in a perpendicular crash configuration based on driving recorder analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 2018;117:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenard J, Welsh R, Danton R. Time-to-collision analysis of pedestrian and pedal-cycle accidents for the development of autonomous emergency braking systems. Accid Anal Prev. 2018;115:128–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li K, Fax X, Yin Z. Pedestrian injury patterns and risk in minibus collisions in China. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:727–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindman M, Ödblom A, Bergvall E, Eidehall A, Svanberg B, Lukaszewicz T. Benefit estimation model for pedestrian auto brake functionality. Paper presented at: 4th International Conference Expert on Accident Research; September 16–18, 2010; Hannover, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Lubbe N, Kullgren A. Assessment of integrated pedestrian protection systems with forward collision warning and automated emergency braking. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 9–11, 2015; Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Matsui Y, Oikawa S, Hitosugi M. Analysis of car-to-bicycle approach patterns for developing active safety devices. Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17:434–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Op den Camp O, van Montfort S, Uittenbogaard J, Welten J. Cyclist target and test setup for evaluation of cyclist-autonomous emergency braking. International Journal of Automotive Technology. 2017;18:1085–1097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Páez F, Furounes A, Badea A. Benefits assessment of autonomous emergency braking pedestrian systems based on real world accidents reconstruction. Paper presented at: 24th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); June 8–11, 2015; Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Rosén E. Autonomous emergency braking for vulnerable road users. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; September 11–13, 2013; Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Rosén E, Källhammer J, Eriksson D, Nentwich M. Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42:1949–1957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosén E, Stigson H, Sander U. Literature review of pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43:25–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiniger P, Bartels O, Pastor C, Wisch M. An open simulation approach to identify chances and limitations for vulnerable road user (VRU) active safety. Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(Suppl. 1):S2–S12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanaka S, Teraoka E. Benefit estimation of active safety systems for crossing-pedestrian scenarios. Paper presented at: FISITA World Automotive Congress; June 2–6, 2014; Maastricht, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Tefft B. Impact speed and a pedestrian’s risk of severe injury or death. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;50:871–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar