Development of injury risk models to guide CT evaluation in the emergency department after motor vehicle collisions

References

• Albert M, McCaig L. Emergency Department Visits for Motor Vehicle Traffic Injuries: United States, 2010–2011. 2015. NCHS Data Brief No. 185.
   Google Scholar
• Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005–Update 2008. Chicago, IL: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Augenstein J, Digges K, Ogata S, Perdeck E, Stratton J. Development and validation of the URGENCY algorithm to predict compelling injuries. Paper presented at: 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Augenstein J, Perdeck E, Stratton J, Digges K, Bahouth G. Characteristics of crashes that increase the risk of serious injuries. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2003;47:561–576.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Augenstein J, Perdeck E, Stratton J, Digges K, Steps J, Bahouth G. Validation of the urgency algorithm for near-side crashes. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2002;46:305–314.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayoung-Chee P, Mack CD, Kaufman R, Bulger E. Predicting severe injury using vehicle telemetry data. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74:190–194; discussion 194–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann BM, Chen EH, Mills AM, et al. Patient perceptions of computed tomographic imaging and their understanding of radiation risk and exposure. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58:1–7.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose D, Crandall JR, McGwin G, Goldman J, Foster J, Fine PR. Computational methodology to predict injury risk for motor vehicle crash victims: a framework for improving advanced automatic crash notification systems. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 2011;19:1048–1059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner DJ, Elliston CD. Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology. 2004;232:735–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed Tomography—An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure. 2009. Available at: https://www-nejm-org.proxy01.its.virginia.edu/doi/10.1056/NEJMra072149?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3Dwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Accessed June 2, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations from the Expert Panel: Advanced Automatic Collision Notification and Triage of the Injured Patient. Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cost Data and Prevention Policies. 2018. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/costs/index.html. Accessed February 24, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Gabler HC, Gabauer DJ, Newell HL, O’Neill ME. Use of Event Data Recorder (EDR) Technology for Highway Crash Data Analysis. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Gabler HC, Hampton CE, Hinch J. Crash Severity: A Comparison of Event Data Recorder Measurements with Accident Reconstruction Estimates. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automobile Engineers; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta M, Schriger DL, Hiatt JR, et al. Selective use of computed tomography compared with routine whole body imaging in patients with blunt trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58:407–416.e15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton CE, Gabler HC. Evaluation of the accuracy of NASS/CDS delta-V estimates from the enhanced WinSmash algorithm. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010;54:241–252.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen CK, Strayer RJ, Shy BD, Kessler S, Givre S, Shah KH. Prevalence of negative CT scans in a level one trauma center. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;44:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber-Wagner S, Lefering R, Qvick L-M, et al., and the Working Group on Polytrauma of the German Trauma Society. Effect of whole-body CT during trauma resuscitation on survival: a retrospective, multicentre study. Lancet. 2009;373:1455–1461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter M, Woltmann A, Hierholzer C, Gärtner C, Bühren V, Stengel D. Association between a single-pass whole-body computed tomography policy and survival after blunt major trauma: a retrospective cohort study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:73–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanz K-G, Paul AO, Lefering R, et al., and the Trauma Registry of the German Trauma Society. Trauma management incorporating focused assessment with computed tomography in trauma (FACTT)—potential effect on survival. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2010;4:4–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kononen DW, Flannagan CAC, Wang SC. Identification and validation of a logistic regression model for predicting serious injuries associated with motor vehicle crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43:112–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusano KD, Sherony R, Gabler HC. Methodology for using advanced event data recorders to reconstruct vehicle trajectories for use in safety impact methodologies (SIM). Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(Suppl 1):S77–S86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maika K, Yusuke M, Jonas P, Sadayuki U. Development of occupant injury prediction algorithms for advanced automatic collision notification by numerical crash reconstructions. Paper presented at: 23rd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, et al. Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ. 2013;346:f2360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Web-Based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS), 2012 Fatal Injury Data. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). 2015 Motor Vehicle Crashes: Overview. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2016a.
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). National Automotive Sampling System. Washington, DC: Department of Transportation; 2016b.
   Google Scholar
• Nishijima DK, Simel DL, Wisner DH, Holmes JF. Does this adult patient have a blunt intra-abdominal injury? JAMA. 2012;307:1517–1527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer R, Pape H-C. Missed injuries in trauma patients: a literature review. Patient Saf Surg. 2008;2:20–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models; 2018. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez RM, Henderson TM, Ritchie AM, et al. Patient preferences and acceptable risk for computed tomography in trauma. Injury. 2014;45:1345–1349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salim A, Sangthong B, Martin M, Brown C, Plurad D, Demetriades D. Whole body imaging in blunt multisystem trauma patients without obvious signs of injury: results of a prospective study. Arch Surg. 2006;141:468–473; discussion 473–475.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sasser SM, Hunt M, Faul R, et al. Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2012;61:1–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sierink JC, Saltzherr TP, Beenen LF, et al. A multicenter, randomized controlled trial of immediate total-body CT scanning in trauma patients (REACT-2). BMC Emerg Med. 2012;12:4–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith CB, Barrett TW, Berger CL, Zhou C, Thurman RJ, Wrenn KD. Prediction of blunt traumatic injury in high-acuity patients: bedside examination vs computed tomography. Am J Emerg Med. 2011;29:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2510–2518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stitzel JD, Weaver AA, Talton JW, et al. An injury severity-, time sensitivity-, and predictability-based advanced automatic crash notification algorithm improves motor vehicle crash occupant triage. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222:1211–1219.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung CK, Kim KH. Missed injuries in abdominal trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 1996;41(2):276–282.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver AA, Talton JW, Barnard RT, Schoell SL, Swett KR, Stitzel JD. Estimated injury risk for specific injuries and body regions in frontal motor vehicle crashes. Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(Suppl 1):S108–S116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar