Intersection AEB implementation strategies for left turn across path crashes

References

• Bálint A, Fagerlind H, Kullgren A. A test-based method for the assessment of pre-crash warning and braking systems. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;59:192–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boran C, Bostrom O, Jacobson BJH, Lie A, Sander U. Saving Lives with V2X Versus On-board Sensing Systems—Which Will Be More Effective?: Technology Leadership Brief. In: SAE Technical Papers. Vol 11. Detroit, MI: SAE International; 2012. Available at: http://papers.sae.org/2012-01-9017/.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards M, Nathanson A, Wisch M. Estimate of potential benefit for Europe of fitting autonomous emergency braking (AEB) systems for pedestrian protection to passenger cars. Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15:S173–S182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euro NCAP. Far Side Occupant Test & Assessment Procedure. Brussels, Belgium: Euro NCAP; 2017 . Available at: https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/32284/euro-ncap-far-side-test-and-assessment-protocol-v10.pdf. Accessed August 20, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Euro NCAP Strategy Working Group. 2020 Roadmap. Brussels, Belgium: Euro NCAP; 2015. Available at: https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/16472/euro-ncap-2020-roadmap-rev1-march-2015.pdf. Accessed August 20, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Traffic Safety Basic Facts on Junctions. Brussles, Belgium: European Commission; 2016. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/sites/roadsafety/files/pdf/statistics/dacota/bfs2016_junctions.pdf. Accessed August 20, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrier-Barbut E, Vaufreydaz D, David J-A, Lussereau J, Spalanzani A. Personal space of autonomous car’s passengers sitting in the driver’s seat. Paper presented at: 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV); 2018; Changshu, Suzhou, China. Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8500648/.
   Google Scholar
• Flannagan CAC, Bálint A, Klinich KD, et al. Comparing motor-vehicle crash risk of EU and U.S. vehicles. Accid Anal Prev. 2018;117:392–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gennarelli TA, Wodzin E, eds. The Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005–Update 2008. Barrington, IL: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson JJ, Crooks LE. A theoretical field-analysis of automobile-driving. Am J Psychol. 1938;51:453–471.
   Google Scholar
• Hautzinger H, Pfeiffer M, Schmidt J. Expansion of GIDAS sample data to the regional level: statistical methodology and practical experiences. Paper presented at: 1st International Conference on ESAR “Expert Symposium on Accident Research”; 2004; Hanover, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Kudlich H. Beitrag zur Mechanik des Kraftfahrzeug-Verkehrsunfalls [Doctoral Dissertation]. Wien Austria: Techn. Hochschule Wien; 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Kullgren A. Validity and reliability of vehicle collision: crash pulse recorders for impact severity and injury risk assessment in real-life frontal impacts [Doctoral Dissertation]. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Neuroscience; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Lubbe N, Jeppsson H, Ranjbar A, Fredriksson J, Bärgman J, Östling M. Predicted road traffic fatalities in Germany: the potential and limitations of vehicle safety technologies from passive safety to highly automated driving. IRCOBI Conf. 2018. 2018; September:17–52.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Traffic Safety Facts 2015: A Compilation of Motor Vehicle Crash Data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates System. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2017. Available at: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812384. Accessed August 20, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Östling M, Saito H, Vishwanatha A, Ding C, Pipkorn B, Sunnevång C. Potential benefit of a 3 + 2 criss cross seat belt system in frontal and oblique crashes. IRCOBI Conf. 2017. 2017;46:613–622.
   Google Scholar
• Otte D, Krettek C, Brunner H, Zwipp H. Scientific approach and methodology of a new in-depth-investigation study in Germany so called GIDAS. Paper presented at: 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); 2003; Nagoya, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Sander U. Opportunities and limitations for intersection collision intervention—a study of real world “left turn across path” accidents. Accid Anal Prev. 2017;99:342–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander U. Predicting safety benefits of automated emergency braking at intersections virtual simulations based on real-world accident data [Doctoral Dissertation]. Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sander U, Lubbe N. Market penetration of intersection AEB: characterizing avoided and residual straight crossing path accidents. Accid Anal Prev. 2018;115:178–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon JM, Sherony R, Gabler HC. Preliminary effectiveness estimates for intersection driver assistance systems in LTAP/OD crashes. Paper presented at: 4th International Symposium on Future Active Safety Technology Towards Zero Traffic Accidents; 2017; Nara, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert A, Erbsmehl C, Hannawald L. Standardized pre-crash scenarios in digital format on the basis of the VUFO simulation input data from GIDAS. Paper presented at: 5th International Conference on ESAR “Expert Symposium on Accident Research”; 2013; Hanover, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert R, Richter E, Wanielik G. Comparison and evaluation of advanced motion models for vehicle tracking. FUSION. 2008;1:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Seiniger P, Bartels O, Pastor C, Wisch M. An open simulation approach to identify chances and limitations for vulnerable road user (VRU) active safety. Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(Suppl. 1):S2–S12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Auken RM, Zellner JW, Chiang DP, et al. Advanced Crash Avoidance Technologies Program—Final Report of the Honda-DRI Team Volume I: Executive Summary and Technical Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2011.
   Google Scholar