Advanced search
Publication Cover
Traffic Injury Prevention Volume 20, 2019 - Issue sup1: Peer-Reviewed Journal for the 26th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV)
Submit an article Journal homepage
6,065
Views
41
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Estimated benefit of automated emergency braking systems for vehicle–pedestrian crashes in the United States

Samantha H. HausVirginia Tech, Center for Injury Biomechanics, Blacksburg, Virginia; Correspondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Rini SheronyToyota Collaborative Safety Research Center, TEMA, Ann Arbor, MichiganView further author information
&
Hampton C. GablerVirginia Tech, Center for Injury Biomechanics, Blacksburg, Virginia; View further author information
Pages S171-S176 | Received 09 Nov 2018, Accepted 29 Mar 2019, Published online: 05 Aug 2019

References

  • Edwards M, Nathanson A, Wisch M. Estimate of potential benefit for Europe of fitting autonomous emergency braking (AEB) systems for pedestrian protection to passenger cars. Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(Suppl. 1):S173–S182.
  • Fuerstenberg KC, Dietmayer K. Object tracking and classification for multiple active safety and comfort applications using a multilayer laser scanner. Paper presented at: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium; June 14–17, 2004.
  • Gates TJ, Noyce DA, Bill AR, Van Ee N. Recommended walking speeds for pedestrian clearance timing based on pedestrian characteristics. Paper presented at: TRB Annual Meeting; 2006.
  • Hamdane H, Serre T, Masson C, Anderson R. Issues and challenges for pedestrian active safety systems based on real world accidents. Accid Anal Prev. 2015;82:53–60.
  • Highway Loss Data Institute. Effect of Subaru EyeSight on pedestrian-related bodily injury liability claim frequencies. HLDI Bull. 2017;34(39).
  • Jermakian JS, Zuby DS. Primary Pedestrian Crash Scenarios: Factors Relevant to the Design of Pedestrian Detection Systems. Arlington, VA: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety; 2011.
  • Kusano KD, Gabler H. Method for estimating time to collision at braking in real-world, lead vehicle stopped rear-end crashes for use in pre-crash system design. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems. 2011;4:435–443.
  • Kusano KD, Gabler HC. Safety benefits of forward collision warning, brake assist, and autonomous braking systems in rear-end collisions. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2012;13:1546–1555.
  • Lefler DE, Gabler HC. The fatality and injury risk of light truck impacts with pedestrians in the United States. Accid Anal Prev. 2004;36:295–304.
  • Lubbe N, Kullgren A. Assessment of integrated pedestrian protection systems with forward collision warning and automated emergency braking. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference Proceedings; 2015.
  • NHTSA. Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) Analytical User’s Manual, 1975–2017. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation; 2018a. DOT HS 812 602.
  • NHTSA. National Automotive Sampling System–General Estimates Data System Analytical User’s Manual, 1988–2015. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation; 2018b. DOT HS 812 312.
  • Ono R, Ike W, Fukaya Y. Pre-collision System for Toyota Safety Sense. SAE International; 2016.
  • Rosén E. Autonomous emergency braking for vulnerable road users. Paper presented at: IRCOBI Conference; 2013; Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Rosén E, Kallhammer JE, Eriksson D, Nentwich M, Fredriksson R, Smith K. Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42:1949–1957.
  • Rosén E, Sander U. Pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed. Accid Anal Prev. 2009;41:536–542.
  • Scanlon JM, Sherony R, Gabler HC. Injury mitigation estimates for an intersection driver assistance system in straight crossing path crashes in the United States. Traffic Inj Prev. 2017;18(Suppl. 1):S9–S17.
  • Shelton TS. National Accident Sampling System General Estimates System Technical Note, 1988 to 1990. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 1991. DOT HS 807 796.
  • Stein WJ, Neuman TR. Mitigation Startegies for Design Exceptions. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration; 2007. FHWA-SA-07-011.
  • Stutts JC, Hunter WW. Police reporting of pedestrians and bicyclists treated in hospital emergency rooms. Transp Res Rec. 1998;1635:88–92.
  • Yanagisawa M, Swanson ED, Azeredo P, Najm W. Estimation of Potential Safety Benefits for Pedestrian Crash Avoidance/Mitigation Systems. Washington, DC: NHTSA; 2017. DOT HS 812 400.
Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.