1,821
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Toward harmonizing prospective effectiveness assessment for road safety: Comparing tools in standard test case simulations

, , , , , , ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages S139-S145 | Received 09 Nov 2018, Accepted 02 May 2019, Published online: 05 Aug 2019

References

  • Alvarez S, Page Y, Sander U, et al. Prospective effectiveness assessment of ADAS and active safety systems via virtual simulation: a review of the current practices. Paper presented at: 25th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); June 5–8, 2017; Detroit, MI.
  • Euro NCAP. Euro NCAP—test protocol AEB VRU systems v2.0.2. 2017. Available at: https://www.euroncap.com/en/for-engineers/protocols/pedestrian-protection/. Accessed November 11, 2018.
  • Hautzinger H, Pfeiffer M, Schmidt J. Expansion of GIDAS sample data to the regional level: statistical methodology and practical experiences. Paper presented at: 1st International Conference on ESAR “Expert Symposium on Accident Research”; September 3–4, 2004; Hanover, Germany.
  • Kalra N, Paddock SM. Driving to Safety: How Many Miles of Driving Would It Take to Demonstrate Autonomous Vehicle Reliability? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2016. Available at: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1478.html. Accessed March 11, 2019.
  • Kolk H, Kirschbichler SK, Tomasch E, Hoschopf H, Luttenberger P, Sinz W. Prospective evaluation of the collision severity of L7e vehicles considering a collision mitigation system. Transportation Research Procedia. 2016;14:3877–3885.
  • Kreiss JP, Feng G, Krampe J, Meyer M, Niebuhr T. Extrapolation of GIDAS accident data to Europe. Paper presented at: 24th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); June 8–11, 2015; Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Lindman M, Isaksson‐Hellman I, Strandroth J. Basic numbers needed to understand the traffic safety effect of automated cars. Paper presented at: 2017 IRCOBI Conference; September 13–15, 2017; Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Op den Camp O, van Montfort S, Uittenbogaard J, Welten J. Cyclist target and test setup for evaluation of cyclist-autonomous emergency braking. International Journal of Automotive Technology. 2017;18:1085–1097.
  • Page Y, Fahrenkrog F, Fiorentino A, et al. A comprehensive and harmonized method for assessing the effectiveness of advance driver assistance systems by virtual simulation. Paper presented at: 24th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); June 8–11, 2015; Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Rosen E. Autonomous emergency braking for vulnerable road users. Paper presented at: 2013 IRCOBI Conference; September 11–13, 2013; Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Sander U. The P.E.A.R.S. initiative: A harmonized method for assessing the effectiveness of advanced driver assistance systems. Paper presented at: Crash.tech Congress; April 19–20, 2016; Munich, Germany.
  • Sander U. Opportunities and limitations for intersection collision intervention—a study of real world “left turn across path” accidents. Accid Anal Prev. 2017;99(Pt A):342–355.
  • Scanlon JM, Sherony R, Gabler HC. Injury mitigation estimates for an intersection driver assistance system in straight crossing path crashes in the United States. Traffic Inj Prev. 2017;18(Suppl. 1):9–17.