Multi-agent traffic simulations to estimate the impact of automated technologies on safety

References

• Behrisch M, Bieker L, Erdmann J, Krajzewicz D. 2011. Sumo–simulation of urban mobility. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Advances in System Simulation (SIMUL 2011), Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchino JB. 2016. Effectiveness of forward collision warning systems with and without autonomous emergency braking in reducing police-reported crash rates. Arlington, VA: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. https://cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/5970437/FCP_FCW_AEB_effectiveness.0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchino JB. 2017. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates. Accid Anal Prev. 99:142–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingus TA, Guo F, Lee S, Antin JF, Perez M, Buchanan-King M, Hankey J. 2016. Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 113(10):2636–2641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle M, Edwards A, Avery M. 2015. AEB real world validation using UK motor insurance claims data. Paper presented at the 24th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Fellendorf M, Vortisch P. 2010. Microscopic traffic flow simulator VISSIM fundamentals of traffic simulation. New York: Springer-Verlag. p 63–93.
   Google Scholar
• Fildes B, Keall M, Bos N, Lie A, Page Y, Pastor C, Pennisi L, Rizzi M, Thomas P, Tingvall C. 2015. Effectiveness of low speed autonomous emergency braking in real-world rear-end crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 81:24–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman TI, Kusano KD, Gabler HC. 2013. Model of fleet-wide safety benefits of Lane Departure Warning systems. Paper presented at the 2013 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems-(ITSC).
   Google Scholar
• Homma R, Kazunori K, Wakasugi T, Tasaka T, Yoshida S. 2012. Evaluation of forward vehicle collision mitigation systems. How drivers respond to warnings under the low expectation of the hazardous situation? Transactions Soc Automot Eng Japan. 43(3):769–775.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson-Hellman I, Lindman M. 2016. Evaluation of the crash mitigation effect of low-speed automated emergency braking systems based on insurance claims data. Traffic Inj Prev. 17(Suppl 1):42–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Japan Police. 2015. Annual report on road traffic fatal accidents and traffic law enforcement violations [in Japanese]. http://www.npa.go.jp/toukei/index.htm#koutsuu.
   Google Scholar
• Kitajima S, Yamaguchi N, Takatori O, Uchida N, Ota H, Adachi A. 2017. Development of simulation for estimation of multiple effects to prevent traffic accident by diffusion of advanced driver assistance system and automated vehicle–Analysis of relationship between driver’s characteristics and driver behavior for adequate modeling. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 26th JSME Conference on Transportation and Logistics (TRANSLOG2017).
   Google Scholar
• Kiuchi T, Katsumata S, Nishimoto T, Ito S, Saito N. 2016. Study on performance evaluation of D-Call Net Algorithm using HELPNET data. Paper presented at the JSAE Annual Congress (Autumn), Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Kusano KD, Gabler HC. 2012. Safety benefits of forward collision warning, brake assist, and autonomous braking systems in rear-end collisions. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 13(4):1546–1555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindman M, Nyström J, Jakobsson L, Ödblom A. 2012. Monitoring the past and the future of a passenger car auto brake system. Paper presented at the Proc. of IRCOBI Conference on Biomechanics of Impacts.
   Google Scholar
• Markkula G, Romano R, Madigan R, Fox CW, Giles OT, Merat N. 2018. Models of human decision-making as tools for estimating and optimizing impacts of vehicle automation. Transp Res Rec. 2672(37):153–163.
   Google Scholar
• Mori H, Kurahashi T, Iwase T, Machida T, Kozato A, Yamashita M, Kitaoka H. 2009. Modeling of pedestrian behavior for evaluating safety systems. J Inf Process Soc Jpn. 50(12):3175–3185.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura S, Hayashi R, Kitajima S. 2017. Measurement and analysis of road crossing behaviors of pedestrians in a street without crosswalk by experiments. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 26th JSME Conference on Transportation and Logistics (TRANSLOG2017).
   Google Scholar
• Papadoulis A, Quddus M, Imprialou M. 2019. Evaluating the safety impact of connected and autonomous vehicles on motorways. Accid Anal Prev. 124:12–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen E. 2013. Autonomous emergency braking for vulnerable road users. Paper presented at the Proceedings of IRCOBI conference.
   Google Scholar
• SAE International. 2018. J3016: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems: SAE Standard J.
   Google Scholar
• Sander U. 2018. Predicting safety benefits of automated emergency braking at intersections-virtual simulations based on real-world accident data [dissertation]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Sander U, Lubbe N. 2018. Market penetration of intersection AEB: characterizing avoided and residual straight crossing path accidents. Accid Anal Prev. 115:178–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternlund S, Strandroth J, Rizzi M, Lie A, Tingvall C. 2017. The effectiveness of lane departure warning systems—a reduction in real-world passenger car injury crashes. Traffic Inj Prev. 18(2):225–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerhuis F, De Waard D. 2017. Reading cyclist intentions: can a lead cyclist’s behaviour be predicted? Accid Anal Prev. 105:146–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuhara N, Tajima J. 2006. Multi-driver agent-based traffic simulation systems for evaluating the effects of advanced driver assistance systems on road traffic accidents. Cogn Tech Work. 8(4):283–300.
   Google Scholar