E-bikers’ braking behavior: Results from a naturalistic cycling study

References

• 16 C.F.R. (U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16). Chapter II - Consumer Product Safety Commission, Section 1512.5 - Requirements for braking system. 2019 Edition. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2019-title16-vol2/pdf/CFR-2019-title16-vol2-sec1512-5.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Baldanzini N, Huertas-Leyva P, Savino G, Pierini M. 2016. Rider behavioral patterns in braking manoeuvres. Transp Res Proc. 14:4374–4383. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.359.
   Google Scholar
• Beck RF. 2009. Mountain bicycle acceleration and braking factors. Accid Reconstr J. 19(4):49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Boele-Vos MJ, Commandeur JJF, Twisk DAM. 2017. Effect of physical effort on mental workload of cyclists in real traffic in relation to age and use of pedelecs. Accid Anal Prev. 105:84–94. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Confederation of the European Bicycle Industry (CONEBI). 2017. European Bicycle Market 2017 Edition—Industry & Market Profile (2016 Statistics). Brussels (Belgium): CONEBI. https://www.raivereniging.nl/ecm/?id=workspace://SpacesStore/072e2902-93de-4eb5-99dd-25227982fcaa.
   Google Scholar
• Corno M, D’Avico L, Panzani G, Savaresi SM. 2017. A haptic-based, safety-oriented, braking assistance system for road bicycles. Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Los Angeles, CA, June 11–14, p. 1189–1194. doi:10.1109/IVS.2017.7995874.
   Google Scholar
• Cossalter V, Lot R, Maggio F. 2004. On the braking behavior of motorcycles. SAE Paper. 18(1):2004-32. doi:10.4271/2004-32-0018.
   Google Scholar
• CROW. 2006. Design manual for cycle traffic. The Netherlands: CROW.
   Google Scholar
• Dozza M. 2013. What is the relation between bicycle dynamics and safety in the real world? Proceeding of the Bicycle and Motorcycle Dynamics Conference, Narashino, Japan, November 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dozza M, Bianchi Piccinini GF. 2014. Do cyclists on e-bikes behave differently than cyclists on traditional bi-cycles? Proceedings of the 3rd International Cycling Safety Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, November 18–19.
   Google Scholar
• Dozza M, Bianchi Piccinini GF, Werneke J. 2016. Using naturalistic data to assess e-cyclist behavior. Transport Res F: Traf. 41:217–226. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.003.
   Google Scholar
• EN 15194:2017. Cycles. Electrically power assisted cycles. EPAC Bicycles; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Enisz K, Szalay I, Nagy K, Kohlrusz G, Fodor D, Jakab R. 2014. Development of a bicycle anti-lock braking system prototype. IJAET. 3(3):111–118. doi:10.18245/ijaet.38209.
   Google Scholar
• European Cyclists’ Federation. 2016. Electromobility for all. Financial incentives for e-cycling. Brussels (Belgium): European Cyclists’ Federation.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman E, Cherry C. 2016. E-bikes in the mainstream: reviewing a decade of research. Transport Rev. 36(1):72–91. doi:10.1080/01441647.2015.1069907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Geus B, Kempenaers F, Lataire P, Meeusen R. 2013. Influence of electrically assisted cycling on physiological parameters in untrained subjects. Eur J Sport Sci. 13(3):290–294. doi:10.1080/17461391.2011.606845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huertas-Leyva P, Dozza M, Baldanzini N. 2018. Investigating cycling kinematics and braking maneuvers in the real world: e-bikes make cyclists move faster, brake harder, and experience new conflicts. Transport Res F: Traf. 54:211–222. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.008
   Google Scholar
• Johnson M, Charlton J, Oxley J, Newstead S. 2010. Naturalistic cycling study: identifying risk factors for on-road commuter cyclists. Annals of advances in automotive medicine/Annual Scientific Conference. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. 54: 275–283.
   Google Scholar
• Klug S, Moia A, Verhagen A, Görges D, Savaresi SM. 2017. Effectiveness of actuating on rectilinear bicycle braking dynamics. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 50(1):972–979. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.173.
   Google Scholar
• Kovácsová N, de Winter JCF, Schwab AL, Christoph M, Twisk DAM, Hagenzieker MP. 2016. Riding performance on a conventional bicycle and a pedelec in low speed exercises: objective and subjective evaluation of middle-aged and older persons. Transport Res F: Traf. 42:28–43. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.018.
   Google Scholar
• Lie D, Sung CK. 2010. Synchronous brake analysis for a bicycle. Mech Mach Theory. 45(4):543–554. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2009.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier O, Pfeiffer M, Scharpf S, Wrede J. 2016. Conditions for nose-over and front wheel lockup of electric bicycles. MECATRONICS 2016/17th International Conference on Research and Education in Mechatronics, REM 2016 (pp. 219–224). doi:10.1109/MECATRONICS.2016.7547145.
   Google Scholar
• Maier O, Pfeiffer M, Wrede J. 2016. Development of a braking dynamics assistance system for electric bicycles: design, implementation, and evaluation of road tests. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 21(3):1671–1679. doi:10.1109/TMECH.2015.2505186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorhead A. 2015. The effect of bicycle geometry, rider posture and rider anthropometrics on pitch-over dynamics.
   Google Scholar
• Niska A, Wenäll J. 2018. Simulated single-bicycle crashes in the VTI Crash Safety Laboratory. Proceedings of 7th International Cycling Safety Conference, ICSC2018, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin J, Rotheram J. 2010. Design speeds and acceleration characteristics of bicycle traffic for use in planning, design and appraisal. Transport Policy. 17(5):335–341. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petzoldt T, Schleinitz K, Krems JF, Gehlert T. 2017. Drivers’ gap acceptance in front of approaching bicycles – effects of bicycle speed and bicycle type. Safe Sci. 92:283–289. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds CCO, Harris MA, Teschke K, Cripton PA, Winters M. 2009. The impact of transportation infrastructure on bicycling injuries and crashes: a review of the literature. Environ Health. 8(1):47. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-8-47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schleinitz K, Petzoldt T, Franke‐Bartholdt L, Krems JF, Gehlert T. 2017. The German Naturalistic Cycling Study – comparing cycling speed of riders of different e-bikes and conventional bicycles. Safety Science. 92:290–297. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Transport Administration (STA). 2014. Safer cycling – a common strategy for the period 2014–2020. Borlänge (Sweden): Swedish Transport Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor D. 1993. Analysis of traffic signal clearance interval requirements for bicycle-automobile mixed traffic. Transport Res Rec. (1405):13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Thom DR, Arao HG, Hancock PA. 1985. Hand position and motorcycle front brake response time. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society - 29th Annual Meeting. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE Publications. p. 278–281.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson DG. 2004. Bicycling science. 3rd ed. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar