An analysis of cyclists’ speed at combined pedestrian and cycle paths

References

• Berg S. 2017. Hållbar Tillgänglig Cykling, [in Swedish]. Sweden: Ramböll; Report 2017-02-01.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi S, Rupi F. 2015. An analysis of bicycle travel speed and disturbances on off-street and on-street facilities. Transp Res Proc. 5:82–94.
   Google Scholar
• Berntman M. 2015. Pedestrians´ accidents and injuries in traffic environment with focus on accidental falls, [in Swedish, with English summary]. Sweden: Lund University, Department of Technology and Society, Transport and Roads; Bulletin 295.
   Google Scholar
• Boufous S, Hatfield J, Grzebieta R. 2018. The impact of environmental factors on cycling speed on shared paths. Accid Anal Prev. 110:171–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers and Gothenburg Municipality. 2016. Measuring bikeability: ett FoU-projekt om smartare cykelnätsanalyser. Inledande metodutveckling och analys av planerat cykelnät i Frihamnen, [in Swedish]. Sweden: Gothenburg municipality, Trafikkontoret; PM 2016-10-31.
   Google Scholar
• Danial J, Eriksson J. 2017. Comparison of cycle flows and speeds from two different cycle measurement equipment’s, [in Swedish, with English summary]. Sweden: Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute; VTI notat 12-2017.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson J, Liu C, Forward S, Forsman Å, Niska A, Tapani A. 2017. The safety effect of an increased cycling – mapping of the current situation for planning for the future. [in Swedish, with English summary]. Sweden: Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute; VTI report 951.
   Google Scholar
• Halldórsdóttir K. 2015. Behavioural models for cycling - Case studies of the Copenhagen Region. [PhD dissertation]. Technical University of Denmark, Transport.
   Google Scholar
• International Transport Forum. 2018. Speed and crash risk. ITF Research Report. International Transport Forum, Paris, France
   Google Scholar
• Jensen P, Rouquier JB, Ovtracht N, Robardet C. 2010. Characterizing the speed and paths of shared bicycles in Lyon. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ. 15(8):522–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kircher K, Nygårdhs S, Ihlström J, Ahlström C. 2018. Cyclist efficiency and its dependence on infrastructure and usual speed. Transp Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 54:148–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kircher K, Nygårdhs S, Ihlström J, Ahlström C. 2017. Cyclists’ interaction with mobile devices, the infrastructure and other road users, [in Swedish, with English summary]. Sweden: Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute; VTI report 940.
   Google Scholar
• Niska A, Eriksson J. 2013. Cycling accident statistics. Background information to the common policy strategy for safe cycling, [in Swedish, with English summary]. Sweden: Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute; VTI report 801.
   Google Scholar
• Niska A, Gustafsson S, Nyberg J, Eriksson J. 2013. Single bicycle accidents. Analysis of injury data and interviews, [in Swedish, with English summary]. Sweden: Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute; VTI report 779.
   Google Scholar
• Schepers JP, Fishman E, den Hertog P, Wolt KK, Schwab AL. 2014. The safety of electrically assisted bicycles compared to classic bicycles. Accid Anal Prev. 73:174–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleinitz K, Petzoldt T, Franke-Bartholdt L, Krems J, Gehlert T. 2017. The German Naturalistic Cycling Study – Comparing cycling speed of riders of different e-bikes and conventional bicycles. Safety of Science. 92:290–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Transport Administration. 2017. Hastighetsundersökningen 2016 – Teknisk rapport. [in Swedish]. Sweden: Swedish Transport Administration; Publication 2017:068.
   Google Scholar
• Ton D, Cats O, Duives D, Hoogendoorn S. 2017. How do people cycle in Amsterdam, Netherlands? Estimating cyclists’ route choice determinants with GPS data from an urban area. Transp Res Rec. 2662(1):75–82.
   Google Scholar