Detailed subject-specific FE rib modeling for fracture prediction

References

• Agnew AM, Murach MM, Dominguez VM, Sreedhar A, Misicka E, Harden A, Bolte JH, Kang Y-S, Stammen J, Moorhouse K, et al. 2018. Sources of variability in structural bending response of pediatric and adult human ribs in dynamic frontal impacts. Stapp Car Crash J. 62:119–192. Nov
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agnew AM, Stout SD. 2012. Brief communication: reevaluating osteoporosis in human ribs: the role of intracortical porosity. Am J Phys Anthropol. 148(3):462–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert DL, Kang Y-S, Agnew AM, Kemper AR. 2017. A Comparison of Rib Structural and Material Properties from Matched Whole Rib Bending and Tension Coupon Tests. Paper presented at: International IRCOBI Conference; September 13-15; Antwerp, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• ANSA version 18.1.x User's Guide 2018. [computer program]. Switzerland
   Google Scholar
• Burkhart TA, Andrews DM, Dunning CE. 2013. Finite element modeling mesh quality, energy balance and validation methods: a review with recommendations associated with the modeling of bone tissue. J Biomech. 46(9):1477–1488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charpail E, Trosseille X, Petit P, Laporte S, Lavaste F, Vallancien G. 2005. Characterization of PMHS ribs: A new test methodology. Stapp Car Crash J. 49:183
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Currey JD. 1970. The mechanical properties of bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 73(6):210–231.
   Google Scholar
• Dominguez VM, Agnew AM. 2014. Patterns in resorptive spaces in elderly rib cortices. Am J Phys Anthropol. 153:107–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez VM, Agnew AM. 2016. Examination of factors potentially influencing osteon size in the human rib. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 299(3):313–324.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dominguez VM, Kang YS, Murach MM, Crowe N, Agnew AM. 2016. Bone area vs cortical area: considering intracortical porosity when predicting rib structural properties. Paper presented at: International IRCOBI Conference; September 14–16; Malaga, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Elemance. Virtual Human Body Models. [Accessed 2018 Nov 26]Available at: http://www.elemance.com/virtual-human-body-models/..
   Google Scholar
• Epker B, Kelin M, Frost H. 1965. Magnitude and location of cortical bone loss in human rib with aging. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 41:198–203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gehre C, Gades H, Wernicke P. 2009. Objective rating of signals using test and simulation responses. Paper presented at: The 21st Annual Enhanced Safety of Vehicles; June 15–18, Stuttgart, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Hallquist J. O. 2006. LS-DYNA theory manual. Livermore, California: Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Holcombe SA, Hwang E, Derstine BA, Wang SC. 2018. Measuring rib cortical bone thickness and cross section from CT. Med Image Anal. 49:27–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcombe SA, Kang YS, Derstine BA, Wang SC, Agnew AM. 2019. Regional maps of rib cortical bone thickness and cross‐sectional geometry. J Anat. doi:10.1111/joa.13045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter R, Kang HS, Briley K, Agnew AM. 2019. Feasibility of volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) to predict rib structural properties. Am J Phys Anthropol. 168: 110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelbaugh CL. 2015. Rib fracture patterns in fatal motor vehicle accidents [Masters thesis]. Tampa (FL): Department of Anthropology, University of South Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Kemper AR, McNally C, Kennedy EA, Manoogian SJ, Rath AL, Ng TP, Stitzel JD, Smith EP, Duma SM, Matsuoka F, et al. 2005. Material properties of human rib cortical bone from dynamic tension coupon testing. Stapp Car Crash J. 49:199–230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemper AR, McNally C, Pullins CA, Freeman LJ, Duma SM, Rouhana SM. 2007. The biomechanics of human ribs: material and structural properties from dynamic tension and bending tests. Stapp Car Crash J. 51:235–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee EL, Craig M, Scarboro M. 2015. Real-world rib fracture patterns in frontal crashes in different restraint conditions. Traff Inj Prev. 16(sup2):S115–S123. 10.1080/15389588.2015.1062888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Kindig MW, Kerrigan JR, Untaroiu CD, Subit D, Crandall JR, Kent RW. 2010. Rib fractures under anterior-posterior dynamic loads: experimental and finite-element study. J Biomech. 43(2):228–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Kindig MW, Subit D, Kent RW. 2010. Influence of mesh density, cortical thickness and material properties on human rib fracture prediction. Med Eng Phys. 32(9):998–1008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Subit D, Kindig M, Kent R. 2010. Development of a Finite Element Ribcage Model of the 50th Percentile Male with Variable Rib Cortical Thickness; Paper presented at: The thirty-Eight International Workshop. Injury Biomechanics Research.
   Google Scholar
• Maida A. 2017. Modélisation des côtes humaines en Flexion antéropostérieur [Master thesis], Villetaneuse (France): The Institut Scientifique et Polytechnique Galilée.
   Google Scholar
• McCalden RW, McGeough JA, Barker MB, Court-Brown CM. 1993. Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 75(8):1193–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza-Vazquez M, Brolin K, Davidsson J, Wismans J. 2013. Human rib response to different restraint systems in frontal impacts: a study using a human body model. Int J Crashworthiness. 18(5):516–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S. 2012. Clinical analysis for the correlation of intra-abdominal organ injury in the patients with rib fracture. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 45(4):246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poulard D, Kent RW, Kindig M, Li Z, Subit D. 2015. Thoracic response targets for a computational model: a hierarchical approach to assess the biofidelity of a 50th-percentile occupant male finite element model. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 45:45–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly DT, Burstein AH. 1975. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech. 8(6):393–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie NL, Wang SC, Sochor MR, Schneider LW. 2006. A method for documenting locations of rib fractures for occupants in real-world crashes using medical computed tomography (ct) scans: SAE Technical Paper; 0148-7191.
   Google Scholar
• Rostas JW, Lively TB, Brevard SB, Simmons JD, Frotan MA, Gonzalez RP. 2017. Rib fractures and their association with solid organ injury: higher rib fractures have greater significance for solid organ injury screening. Am J Surg. 213(4):791–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoell SL, Weaver AA, Urban JE, Jones DA, Stitzel JD, Hwang E, Reed MP, Rupp JD, Hu J. 2015. Development and validation of an older occupant finite element model of a mid-sized male for investigation of age-related injury risk. Stapp Car Crash J. 59:359–383.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schoell SL, Weaver AA, Vavalle NA, Stitzel JD. 2015. Age-and sex-specific thorax finite element model development and simulation. Traffic Inj Prev. 16(sup1):S57–S65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlin ED, Frost HM, Villanueva AR. 1963. Variations in cross-section area of rib cortex with age. J Gerontol. 18(1):9–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shigeta K, Kitagawa Y, Yasuki T. 2009. Development of next generation human FE model capable of organ injury prediction. Paper presented at: The 21st Annual Enhanced Safety of Vehicles; June 15–18, Stuttgart; Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Simpleware LTD. Simpleware Reference Guide 2017. [computer program]. Innovation centre rennes drive, Exeter, United Kingdom: Simpleware LTD.
   Google Scholar
• Stein I, Granik G. 1976. Rib structure and bending strength: an autopsy study. Calc Tissue Res. 20(1):61–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Subit D, de Dios EP, Valazquez-Ameijide J, Arregui-Dalmases C, Crandall J. 2011. Tensile material properties of human rib cortical bone under quasi-static and dynamic failure loading and influence of the bone microstucture on failure characteristics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1108.0390v2.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi H, Frost HM. 1966. Age and sex related changes in the amount of cortex of normal human ribs. Acta Orthop Scand. 37(2):122–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thor C, Gabler H. 2008. The relationship between thoracic organ injuries and associated rib fractures. Biomed Sci Instrum. 44:292
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CORA Release 3.6 User’s Manual 2012. [computer program]. Gaimersheim, Germany: PDB - Partnership for Dummy Technology and Biomechanics;
   Google Scholar
• Toyota Central R&D Labs. 2018. INC. Human Body Models for Injury Analysis THUMS®. [Accessed 2018 Nov 26]. Available at: https://www.tytlabs.com/tech/thums/index.html..
   Google Scholar
• Treece GM, Gee AH, Mayhew P, Poole KE. 2010. High resolution cortical bone thickness measurement from clinical CT data. Medical Image Analysis. 14(3):276–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavalle NA, Davis ML, Stitzel JD, Gayzik FS. 2015. Quantitative validation of a human body finite element model using rigid body impacts. Ann Biomed Eng. 43(9):2163–2174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavalle NA, Moreno DP, Rhyne AC, Stitzel JD, Gayzik FS. 2013. Lateral impact validation of a geometrically accurate full body finite element model for blunt injury prediction. Ann Biomed Eng. 41(3):497–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar