Are you an ambitious cyclist? Results of the cyclist profile questionnaire in Germany

References

• Aldred R, Woodcock J, Goodman A. 2015. Does more cycling mean more diversity in cycling? Transp Rev. 1647:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Bergström A, Magnusson R. 2003. Potential of transferring car trips to bicycle during winter. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract. 37:649–666. doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(03)00012-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown TD, O’Connor JP, Barkatsas AN. 2009. Instrumentation and motivations for organised cycling: The development of the Cyclist Motivation Instrument (CMI). J Sport Sci Med. 8:211–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C-F. 2009. Personality, safety attitudes and risky driving behaviors - Evidence from young Taiwanese motorcyclists. Accid Anal Prev. 41:963–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damant-Sirois G, Grimsrud M, El-Geneidy AM. 2014. What’s your type: a multidimensional cyclist typology. Transportation. 41(6):1153–1169. doi:10.1007/s11116-014-9523-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dill J, McNeil N. 2013. Four types of cyclists?: Examination of typology for better understanding of bicycling behaviour and potential. Transp Res Rec. 2387(1):129–138. doi:10.3141/2387-15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Félix R, Baptista e Silva J. 2013. User’s needs and preferences for network cycling planning and management in the city of Lisbon, a starter city. Presented at: ICHC2013—XXIVth International Cycling History Conference; Palácio Foz, Lisboa, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Gamble T, Walker I. 2016. Wearing a bicycle helmet can increase risk taking and sensation seeking in adults. Psychol Sci. 27(2):289–294. doi:10.1177/0956797615620784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatersleben B, Haddad H. 2010. Who is the typical bicyclist? Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 13(1):41–48. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geller R. 2006. Four types of cyclists. Portland Bureau of Transportation, Portland, OR. Available at: https://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/article/264746. Accessed October 5, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Handy S, van Wee B, Kroesen M. 2014. Promoting cycling for transport: Research needs and challenges. Transp Rev. 34(1):4–24. doi:10.1080/01441647.2013.860204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen M. 1999. Passion and heart in transport—a sociological analysis on transport behaviour. Transp Policy. 6(1):19–33. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(98)00029-8
   Google Scholar
• Jones H. Understanding walking and cycling using a life course perspective. University of the West England. 2013. Available at: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/22172. Accessed November 30, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kroesen M, Handy S. 2014. The relation between bicycle commuting and non-work cycling: results from a mobility panel. Transportation. 41(3):507–527. doi:10.1007/s11116-013-9491-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger M, Myburgh E, Saayman M. 2016. A motivation-based typology of road cyclists in the Cape Town cycle tour, South Africa. J Trav Tourism Market. 33(3):380–403. doi:10.1080/10548408.2015.1064057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont M, Jenkins J. 2013. Segmentation of cycling event participants: a two-step cluster method utilizing recreation specialization. Event Manag. 17(4):391–407. doi:10.3727/152599513X13769392444666
   Google Scholar
• Larsen J, El-Geneidy A. 2011. A travel behavior analysis of urban cycling facilities in Montreal Canada. Transp Res D Transp Environ. 16(2):172–177. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2010.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leben J. 2016. Rad Fahrende/wer sie sind und was sie brauchen. Berlin, Germany: LIT Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lee-Gosselin M. 2002. Some reflections on GPS-supported travel survey methods in an increasingly ICT-rich environment. Presented at: Workshop on ICT, Innovation and the Transport System; Arlington, USA. p. 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Leiner DJ. 2014. SoSci survey (Version 2.6.00-i) [Computer software]. Available at https://www.soscisurvey.de. Accessed November 30, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Musselwhite C, Avineri E, Fulcher E. 2010. Road safety research report no. 112: Understanding public attitudes to road-user safety—literature review: Final report. London: Department for Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips R, Fyhri A, Sagberg F. 2011. Risk compensation and bicycle helmets. Risk Anal. 8:1187–1195. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01589.x
   Google Scholar
• Sharma G. 2017. Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. Int J Appl Res. 3:749–752.
   Google Scholar
• Stinson M, Bhat C. 2003. Commuter bicyclist route choice: Analysis using a stated preference survey. Transportation Res Rec: J Transport Res Board. 1828:107–115.
   Google Scholar
• Sullman M J, Taylor J E. 2010. Social desirability and self-reported driving behaviours: Should we be worried? Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 13(3):215–221. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2010.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg L. 2005. Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract. 39:147–162. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinecke A, Hallerbach B. 1996. Fahrradtourismus—ein Bericht zur Forschungslage und zu den Forschungsdefiziten. In: Biermann A, editor. Fahrradtourismus—Baustein eines marktgerechten und umweltverträglichen Tourismus. Trier: ETI-Texte. p. 25–50.
   Google Scholar