Head injury metric response in finite element ATDs and a human body model in multidirectional loading regimes

References

• Albert DL, Beeman SM, Kemper AR. 2018. Evaluation of Hybrid III and THOR-M neck kinetics and injury risk under various restraint conditions during full-scale frontal sled tests. Traffic Injury Prev. 19:S40–S47. doi:10.1080/15389588.2017.1405390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey AM, Christopher JJ, Salzar RS, Brozoski F. 2015. Comparison of Hybrid-III and postmortem human surrogate response to simulated underbody blast loading. J Biomech Eng. 137(5):051009. doi:10.1115/1.4029981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie-Gregg NJ, Lawrence C, Somers J. 2017. Occupant protection modeling and injury prediction for NASA human exploration spacecraft. Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 International Conference on Human Factors in Simulation and Modeling, July 17–21. Los Angeles, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Danelson KA, Kemper AR, Mason MJ, Tegtmeyer M, Swiatkowski SA, Bolte JH, Hardy WN. 2015. Comparison of ATD to PMHS response in the under-body blast environment. SAE Technical Paper. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26660754
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register. Part V. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Consumer Information: New Car Assessment Program. In Docket No. NHTSA-2015-0119. Vol 80 FR 785212015, p. 78521–78591.
   Google Scholar
• Gaewsky JP, Jones DA, Ye X, Koya B, McNamara KP, Gayzik FS, Weaver AA, Putnam JB, Somers JT, Stitzel JD. 2018. Modeling human volunteers in multidirectional, uni-axial sled tests using a finite element human body model. Ann Biomed Eng. 47:487–511. doi:10.1007/s10439-018-02147-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GESAC. 2005. Biomechancial response requirements of the THOR NHTSA advanced frontal dummy. Boonsboro, MD: General Engineering and Systems Analysis Company, Inc
   Google Scholar
• Jones DA, Gaewsky J, Saffarzadeh M, Putnam JB, Weaver AA, Somers JT, Stitzel JD. 2018. Multi-direction validation of a finite element 50th Percentile Male Hybrid III anthropomorphic test device for spaceflight applications. J Biomech Eng. 141:031004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laituri TR, Henry S, Pline K, Li G, Frankstein M, Weerappuli P. 2016. New Risk Curves for NHTSA's Brain Injury Criterion (BrIC): Derivations and Assessments. Stapp Car Crash J. 60:301–362.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawrence C, Fasanella EL, Tabiei A, Brinkley JW, Shemwell DM. 2008. The Use of a Vehicle Acceleration Exposure Limit Model and a Finite Element Crash Test Dummy Model to Evaluate the Risk of Injuries During Orion Crew Module Landings (NASA/TM—2008-215198). Cleveland, OH: NASA.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara KP, Jones DA, Gaewsky JP, Putnam JB, Somers JT, Weaver AA, Stitzel JD. 2018. Validation of a finite element 50th percentile THOR anthropomorphic test device in multiple sled test configurations. Stapp Car Crash J. 62:415–442.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NASA. 2010. NASA Human Integration Design Handbook (HIDH) NASA/SP-2010-3407/REV1. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
   Google Scholar
• NASA. 2011. NASA Space Flight Human-System Standard Volume 2: Human Factors, Habitability, and Environmental Health. Document Number: STD-30012011. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Newby N, Somers JT, Caldwell EE, Perry C, Littell J, Gernhardt M. 2013. Assessing biofidelity of the Test Device for Human Occupant Restraint (THOR) against historic human volunteer data. Stapp Car Crash J. 57:469–505.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NHTSA. 1995. Final Economic Assessment, FMVSS No. 201, Upper Interior Head Protection. Washington, DC: Office of Regulatory Analysis, Plans and Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Parent D, Craig M, Moorhouse K. 2017. Biofidelity evaluation of the THOR and Hybrid III 50th percentile male frontal impact anthropomorphic test devices. Stapp Car Crash J. 61:227–276.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patalak J, Davis M, Gaewsky J, Stitzel J, Harper M. 2018. Influence of driver position and seat design on thoracolumbar loading during frontal impacts. SAE Technical Paper, 2018-01-0544, p. 0148–7191. https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0544c
   Google Scholar
• Perry C, Burneka C, Albery C. 2013. Biodynamic assessment of the THOR-K Manikin. Dayton, OH: Air Force Research Lab, Wright-Patterson AFB.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz D, Guleyupoglu B, Koya B, Stitzel JD, Gayzik FS. 2015. Development of a computationally efficient full human body finite element model. Traffic Injury Prev. 16(sup1):S49–S56. doi:10.1080/15389588.2015.1021418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somers JT, Granderson B, Scheuring R. 2010. Occupant protection at NASA. Houston, TX: NASA Johnson Space Center.
   Google Scholar
• Somers JT, Gohmert DM, Brinkley JW. 2014. Spacecraft occupant protection requirements: a review of the recent changes. Aviat Space Environ Med. 85(9):940–948. doi:10.3357/ASEM.4004.2014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Somers JT, Gohmert D, Brinkley JW. 2017. Application of the Brinkley dynamic response criterion to spacecraft transient dynamic events. Houston, TX: NASA Johnson Space Center.
   Google Scholar
• Somers JT, Newby NJ, Lawrence C, DeWeese RL, Moorcroft D, Phelps SE. 2014. Investigation of the THOR anthropomorphic test device for predicting occupant injuries during spacecraft launch aborts and landing. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2:4. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2014.00004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takhounts EG, Craig MJ, Moorhouse K, McFadden J, Hasija V. 2013. Development of brain injury criteria (BrIC). SAE Technical Paper. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24435734
   Google Scholar
• Versace J. 1971. A review of the severity index. Stapp Car Crash Conference. Coronado, CA. p. 771–96.
   Google Scholar