Biomechanical impact testing of synthetic versus human cadaveric tibias for predicting injury risk during pedestrian-vehicle collisions

References

• Carroll J, Barrow A, Hardy B, Robinson B. 2014. Pedestrian legform test area assessment. Proj Rep RPN2770.
   Google Scholar
• Coquim J, Clemenzi J, Salahi M, Sherif A, Tavakkoli Avval P, Shah S, Schemitsch E H, Bagheri Z. S, Bougherara H, Zdero R, et al. 2018. Biomechanical analysis using FEA and experiments of metal plate and bone strut repair of a femur midshaft segmental defect. Biomed Res Int. 2018:1–11. doi:10.1155/2018/4650308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfar J, Stanbury S, Martin R, Menorca G, Reed JD. 2014. Composite bone models in orthopaedic surgery research and education. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 22(2):111–20. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-22-02-111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehring D-U. 2010. Flexible pedestrian legform impactor flex GTR evaluation tests. A joint report from The European Automobile Manufacturer's Association and The German Federal Highway Research Institute; Report No. TEG-141. doi:10.4271/2003-01-0895[10.4271/2003-01-0895]
   Google Scholar
• Heiner AD. 2008. Structural properties of fourth-generation composite femurs and tibias. J Biomech. 41(15):3282–4. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.08.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huston RL. 2013. Fundamentals of biomechanics. 1st ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerrigan JR, Bhalla KS, Madeley NJ, Funk JR, Bose D, Crandall JR. 2003. Experiments for establishing pedestrian-impact lower limb injury criteria. In: SAE Technical Paper, SAE International; Charlottesville, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Kerrigan J R, Drinkwater DC, Kam CY, Murphy DB, Ivarsson BJ, Crandall JR, Patrie J. 2004. Tolerance of the human leg and thigh in dynamic latero-medial bending. Int J Crashworthiness. 9(6):607–623. doi:10.1533/ijcr.2004.0315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konosu A, Tanahashi M. 2003. Development of a biofidelic flexible pedestrian legform impactor. Stapp Car Crash J. 47:459–72. doi:10.4271/2003-22-0020
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuzyk PRT, Zdero R, Shah S, Olsen M, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH. 2012. Femoral head lag screw position for cephalomedullary nails: a biomechanical analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 26(7):414–21. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e318229acca
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez AA, Chakravarty AB, Quenneville CE. 2018. The effect of impact duration on the axial fracture tolerance of the isolated tibia during automotive and military impacts. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 78(2017):315–320. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinberg E, Agel J, Roberts C, Karam M, Roberts C. 2018. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium. J Orthop Trauma. 32(S1):1–10. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo F, Jean P, Jaques J, Masson C. 2012. Injury tolerance of tibia for the car–pedestrian impact. Accid Anal Prev. 46:18–25. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2011.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyquist GW, Cheng R, El-Bohy AAR, King AI. 1985. Tibia bending: strength and respons. In: SAE Technical Paper 851728. Vol. 94. SAE International. p. 240–253. doi:10.4271/851728[10.4271/851728]
   Google Scholar
• Quenneville CE, Greeley GS, Dunning CE. 2010. Evaluation of synthetic composite tibias for fracture testing using impact loads. Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med. 224(10):1195–1199. doi:10.1243/09544119JEIM736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quenneville CE, McLachlin SD, Greeley GS, Dunning CE. 2011. Injury tolerance criteria for short-duration axial impulse loading of the tsolated tibia. J Trauma. 70(1):13–18. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181f6bb0e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafaels KA, Gillich PJ, Ehlers RZ, Duvall PS. 2013. Lower leg injuries in dismounted military personnel from buried explosives. In: International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury Conference. Gothenburg, Sweden. p. 171–182.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber P, Crandall J, Hurwitz S, Nusholtz GS. 1998. Static and dynamic bending strength of the leg. Int J Crashworthiness. 3(3):295–308. doi:10.1533/cras.1998.0077
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2012. Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to their pedestrian safety performance. United Nations Regulation 127.
   Google Scholar
• van Ratingen M, Williams A, Lie A, Seeck A, Castaing P, Kolke R, Adriaenssens G, Miller A. 2016. The European New Car Assessment Programme: a historical review. Chinese J Traumatol English Ed. 19(2):63–69. doi:10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.11.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L, Bilkhu S, Farooq I, Hickman J, Jensen J, McCabe K, Nusholtz G. 2014. Performance comparison and repeatability evaluation of the flex PLI and the TRL pedestrian legform impactors. US. https://www-esv.nhtsa.dot.gov/proceedings/24/files/24ESV-000177.PDF. (Accessed September 12, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Zander O, Lorenz B, Gehring D-U. 2007. Leßmann P. Predication of lower extremity injury risks during an impact on modern car fronts with a flexible pedestrian legform impactor according to EEVC WG 17. In: 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV); Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Zdero R, Aziz MSR, Nicayenzi B. 2017. Quasi-static stiffness and strength testing of whole bones and implants. In: Zdero R, ed. Experimental methods in orthopaedic biomechanics. 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Inc. p. 19–32. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-803802-4.00002-0
   Google Scholar