Gender differences in the effectiveness of public education messages aimed at smartphone use among young drivers

References8

• Cathcart R, Glendon I. 2016. Judged effectiveness of threat and coping appraisal anti-speeding messages. Accid Anal Prev. 96:237–248. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cismaru M. 2014. Using the Extended Parallel Process Model to understand texting while driving and guide communication campaigns against it. Social Market Q. 20(1):66–82. doi:10.1177/1524500413517893
   Google Scholar
• Gauld CS, Lewis I, White KM, Fleiter JJ, Watson B. 2017. Evaluating public education messages aimed at monitoring and responding to social interactive technology on smartphones among young drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 104:24–35. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauld CS, Lewis IM, White KM, Watson B. 2016. Young drivers’ engagement with social interactive technology on their smartphone: Critical beliefs to target in public education messages. Accid Anal Prev. 96:208–218. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenbeld C, Twisk D, Houwing S. 2008. Effects of persuasive communication and group discussions on acceptability of anti-speeding policies for male and female drivers. Transport Res Part F Psychol Beh. 11(3):207–220. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2007.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttman N. 2015. Persuasive appeals in road safety communication campaigns: Theoretical frameworks and practical implications from the analysis of a decade of road safety campaign materials. Accid Anal Prev. 84:153–164. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra T, Wegman F. 2011. Improving the effectiveness of road safety campaigns: current and new practices. IATSS Res. 34(2):80–86. doi:10.1016/j.iatssr.2011.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson TP, Wundersitz LN. 2011. Road safety mass media campaigns: Why are results inconclusive, and what can be done?. Int J Inj Cont Saf Prom. 18(3):235–241. doi:10.1080/17457300.2010.540330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley-Baker T, Romano E. 2010. Female involvement in U.S. nonfatal crashes under a three-level hierarchical crash model. Accid Anal Prev. 42(6):2007–2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon R, Rentfro R, O’Leary B. 2010. Social marketing and distracted driving behaviors among young adults: The effectiveness of fear appeals. Acad Mark Stud. 14(2):95–113.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis I, Watson B, Tay R. 2007. Examing the effectiveness of physical threats in road safety advertising: the role of the third person effect, gender, and age. Transp Res Part F Psychol Behav. 10(1):48–60. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2006.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis I, Watson B, Tay R, White KM. 2007. The role of fear appeals in improving driver safety: a review of the effectiveness of fear-arousing (threat) appeals in road safety advertising. Int J Behav Consult Ther. 2:203–222. doi:10.1037/h0100799
   Google Scholar
• Lewis I, Watson B, White KM. 2016. The step approach to message design and testing (SatMDT): A conceptual framework to guide the development and evaluation of persuasive health messages. Accid Anal Prev. 97:309–314. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis I, White KM, Ho B, Elliott B, Watson B. 2017. Insights into targeting young male drivers with anti-speeding advertising: An application of the Step approach to Message Design and Testing (SatMDT). Accid Anal Prev. 103:129–142. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis I, Watson B, White KM. 2008. An examination of message-relevant affect in road safety messages: Should road safety advertisements aim to make us feel good or bad?. Transp Res Part F Psychol Behav. 11(6):403–417. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2008.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis I.M, Watson B, White K.M. 2010. White KM Response efficacy: the key to minimizing rejection and maximizing acceptance of emotion-based anti-speeding messages. Accid Anal Prev. 42(2):459–467. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips R, Torquato R. 2009. An overview of 45 anti-speeding campaigns. Oslo, Norway: Institute of Transport Economics, Norwegian Centre for Transport Research.
   Google Scholar
• Rudisill T, Zhu M. 2017. Hand-held phone sue while driving legislation and observed driver behaviour among population sub-groups in the Unimted States. BMC Pub Health. 17:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley C, Harre N. 2009. The impact of different styles of traffic of traffic safety advertisement on young drivers' explicit and implicit self-enhancement bias. Transport Res Part F Psychol Beh. 12(2):159–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay R. 2011. Drivers’ perception of two seatbelt wearing advertisements with different emotional appeals and cultural settings. J Aust Coll Road Safety. 22(4):82–89.
   Google Scholar
• Tay R, Watson B. 2002. Changing Drivers’ Intentions and Behaviours Using Fear-Based Driver Fatigue Advertisements. Health Mark Quart. 19(4):55–68. doi:10.1300/J026v19n04_05
   PubMedGoogle Scholar