Driver experiences with the alcohol ignition interlock: Comparing successful and poor performers

References

• Beck KH, Kelley-Baker T, Voas RB. 2015. DUI offenders' experience with an ignition interlock program: comparing those who have and have not adapted from their primary drinking location. Traffic Inj Prev. 16(4):329–335. doi:10.1080/15389588.2014.948617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck KH, Treiman KA. 1996. The relationship of social context of drinking, perceived social norms, and parental influence to various drinking patterns of adolescents. Addict Behav. 21(5):633–644. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(95)00087-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck KH, Ahmed A, Farkas ZA. 2011. A descriptive analysis of the social context of drinking among first-time DUI offenders. Traffic Inj Prev. 12(4):306–311. doi:10.1080/15389588.2011.564693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck KH, Caldeira KM, Vincent KB, Arria AM. 2013. Social contexts of drinking and subsequent alcohol use disorder among college students. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 39(1):38–43. doi:10.3109/00952990.2012.694519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck KH, Zanjani F, Allen HK. 2019. Social context of drinking among older adults: Relationship to alcohol and traffic risk behaviors. Transport Res Part F: Psychol Behav. 64:161–170. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beirness D, Marques P. 2004. Alcohol Ignition Interlock Programs. Traffic Inj Prev. 5(3):299–308. doi:10.1080/15389580490465418
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elder RW, Voas R, Beirness D, Shults RA, Sleet DA, Nichols JL, Compton R, Task Force on Community Preventive Services. 2011. Effectiveness of ignition interlocks for preventing alcohol-impaired driving and alcohol-related crashes: A Community Guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 40(3):362–376. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fell JC. 2014. Update: Repeat DWI offenders involvement in fatal crashes in 2010. Traffic Inj Prev. 15(5):431–433. doi:10.1080/15389588.2013.838230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund AK, McCartt AT, Farmer CM. 2012. Contribution of alcohol-impaired driving to motor vehicle crash deaths in 2010. Arlington, VA: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
   Google Scholar
• Marques PR, Tippetts AS, Allen J, Javors M, Alling C, Yegles M, Pragst F, Wurst F. 2010. Estimating driver risk using alcohol biomarkers, interlock blood alcohol concentration tests and psychometric assessments: initial descriptives. Addiction. 105(2):226–239. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02738.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques PR, Tippetts AS, Voas RB. 2003. Comparative and joint prediction of DUI recidivism from alcohol ignition interlock and driver records. J Stud Alcohol. 64(1):83–92. doi:10.15288/jsa.2003.64.83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques PR, Tippetts AS, Voas RB, Beirness DJ. 2001. Predicting repeat DUI offenses with the alcohol interlock recorder. Accid Anal Prev. 33(5):609–619. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00074-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques PR, Voas RB, Tippetts AS, Beirness DJ. 1999. Behavioral monitoring of DUI offenders with the alcohol ignition interlock recorder. Addiction. 94(12):1861–1870. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9412186111.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCartt AT, Leaf WA, Farmer CM. 2018. Effects of Washington State's alcohol ignition interlock laws on DUI recidivism: An update. Traffic Inj Prev. 19(7):665–674. doi:10.1080/15389588.2018.1496426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson RD, Vanlaar WGM, Hing MM. 2018. Annual ignition interlock survey 2016 & 2017: United States. Washington, DC: Traffic Injury Research Foundation, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Timken DS, Nandi A, Marques PR. 2012. Interlock enhancement counseling: Enhancing motivation for responsible driving—a provider's guide. Boulder, CO: Center for Impaired Driving Research and Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Timken DS, Marques PR. 2001. Support for Interlock Planning (SIP): Providers manual. Calverton, MD: Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation. Available at: www.pire.org/sip/sipmanuals.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Vanlaar WGM, Robertson R, Schaap D, Vissers J. 2010. Understanding behavioural patterns of interlocked offenders to inform the efficient and effective implementation of interlock programs: How offenders on an interlock learn to comply. Ottawa, ON: Traffic Injury Research Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Voas RB. 2020. Vehicle safety features aimed at preventing alcohol-related crashes. Forensic Sci Rev. 32(1):55–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Voas RB, Tippetts AS. 2012. Requiring interlocks to reinstate: 50% effective [Abstract 0214]. Alcoholism: Clin Exper Res. 36(Suppl 6):64A.
   Google Scholar
• Voas RB, Tippetts AS, Grosz M. 2012. Requiring interlocks to reinstate: 50% effective. Poster presented at 35th Annual RSA Scientific Meeting, Research Society on Alcoholism, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Voas RB, Tippetts AS, Bergen G, Grosz M, Marques P. 2016. Mandating treatment based on interlock performance: Evidence for effectiveness. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 40(9):1953–1960. doi:10.1111/acer.13149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinrath M. 1997. The ignition interlock program for drunk drivers: A multivariate test. Crime and Delinquency. 43(1):42–59. doi:10.1177/0011128797043001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis C, Lybrand S, Bellamy N. 2004. Alcohol ignition interlock programmes for reducing drink driving recidivism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (4):CD004168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar