Promote or inhibit: An inverted U-shaped effect of workload on driver takeover performance

References

• Anderson JM, Nidhi K, Stanley KD, Sorensen P, Samaras C, Oluwatola OA. 2014. Autonomous vehicle technology: a guide for policymakers. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Memory Lang. 59(4):390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookhuis KA, De Waard D, Fairclough SH. 2003. Criteria for driver impairment. Ergonomics. 46(5):433–445. doi:10.1080/001401302/1000039556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruggen A. 2015. An empirical investigation of the relationship between workload and performance. Manage Decis. 53(10):2377–2389. doi:10.1108/MD-02-2015-0063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Waard D. 1996. The measurement of drivers’ mental workload. Groningen: Groningen University, Traffic Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• De Waard D, Lewis-Evans B. 2014. Self-report scales alone cannot capture mental workload. A reply to De Winter, Controversy in human factors constructs and the explosive use of the NASA TLX: A measurement perspective. Cognition Technol Work. 16(3):303–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldhütter A, Gold C, Schneider S, Bengler K. 2017. How the duration of automated driving influences take-over performance and gaze behavior. Paper presented at: In Advances in ergonomic design of systems, products and processes. Berlin Heidelberg, March. p. 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Gold C, Damböck D, Lorenz L, Bengler K. 2013. Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? Paper Presented at: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. September, Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. doi:10.1177/1541931213571433
   Google Scholar
• Hart SG, Staveland LE. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N, editors. Advances in psychology. Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: North-Holland Press. p. 139–183.
   Google Scholar
• Hebb DO. 1955. Drives and the CNS (conceptual nervous system). Psychol Rev. 62(4):243–254. doi:10.1037/h0041823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller O. 1981. Theorie und Praxis des Verfahrens der Kategorienunterteilung (KU). In: Heller O, ed. Forschungsbericht. Würzburg, Germany: Psychologisches Institut der Universität Würzburg. p. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald AD, Alambeigi H, Engström J, Markkula G, Vogelpohl T, Dunne J, Yuma N. 2019. Toward computational simulations of behavior during automated driving takeovers: a review of the empirical and modeling literatures. Hum Factors. 61(4):642–688. doi:10.1177/0018720819829572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehler B, Reimer B, Coughlin JF, Dusek JA. 2009. Impact of incremental increases in cognitive workload on physiological arousal and performance in young adult drivers. Transp Res Rec. 2138(1):6–12. doi:10.3141/2138-02
   Google Scholar
• Miller D, Sun A, Johns M, Ive H, Sirkin D, Aich S, Ju W. 2015. Distraction becomes engagement in automated driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting; September, Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. doi:10.1177/1541931215591362
   Google Scholar
• Montani F, Vandenberghe C, Khedhaouria A, Courcy F. 2020. Examining the inverted U-shaped relationship between workload and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and mindfulness. Hum Relat. 73(1):59–93. doi:10.1177/0018726718819055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naujoks F, Purucker C, Wiedemann K, Marberger C. 2019. Noncritical state transitions during conditionally automated driving on german freeways: effects of non-driving related tasks on takeover time and takeover quality. Hum Factors. 61(4):596–613. doi:10.1177/0018720818824002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neubauer C, Matthews G, Saxby D. 2012. The effects of cell phone use and automation on driver performance and subjective state in simulated driving. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting; September, Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. doi:10.1177/1071181312561415
   Google Scholar
• Society of Automotive Engineer (SAE) International J3016. 2018. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
   Google Scholar
• Strayer DL, Turrill J, Cooper JM, Coleman JR, Medeiros-Ward N, Biondi F. 2015. Assessing Cognitive Distraction in the Automobile. Hum Factors. 57(8):1300–1324. doi:10.1177/0018720815575149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlakveld W, van Nes N, de Bruin J, Vissers L, van der Kroft M. 2018. Situation awareness increases when drivers have more time to take over the wheel in a Level 3 automated car: a simulator study. Transp Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 58:917–929. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.07.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan JY, Wu CX. 2018. The effects of lead time of take-over request and nondriving tasks on taking-over control of automated vehicles. IEEE Trans Human-Mach Syst. 48(6):582–591. doi:10.1109/THMS.2018.2844251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright TJ, Samuel S, Borowsky A, Zilberstein S, Fisher DL. 2016. Experienced drivers are quicker to achieve situation awareness than inexperienced drivers in situations of transfer of control within a level 3 autonomous environment. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 60th Annual Meeting; September, Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Young MS, Stanton NA. 2002. Malleable attentional resources theory: a new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance. Hum Factors. 44(3):365–375. doi:10.1518/0018720024497709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeeb K, Buchner A, Schrauf M. 2016. Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving. Accid Anal Prev. 92:230–239. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, de Winter J, Varotto S, Happee R, Martens M. 2019. Determinants of take-over time from automated driving: a meta-analysis of 129 studies. Transp Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 64:285–307. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar