The effect of the scalp on the effectiveness of bicycle helmets' anti-rotational acceleration technologies

References

• Bland ML, McNally C, Rowson S. 2018. Headform and neck effects on dynamic response in bicycle helmet oblique impact testing. Proceedings of IRCOBI Conference, Athens, Greece, September. p. 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bland ML, McNally C, Rowson S. 2018. Differences in impact performance of bicycle helmets during oblique impacts. J. Biomech. Eng. 140(9):091005. doi:10.1115/1.4040019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland ML, McNally C, Zuby DS, Mueller BC, Rowson S. 2020. Development of the STAR evaluation system for assessing bicycle helmet protective performance. Ann Biomed Eng. 48(1):47–57. volume. doi:10.1007/s10439-019-02330-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliven E, Rouhier A, Tsai S, Willinger R, Bourdet N, Deck C, Madey SM, Bottlang M. 2019. Evaluation of a novel bicycle helmet concept in oblique impact testing. Accid Anal Prev. 124:58–65. 10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottlang M, Rouhier A, Tsai S, Gregoire J, Madey S. 2020. Impact performance comparison of advanced bicycle helmets with dedicated rotation-damping systems. Ann Biomed Eng. 48(1):68–78. doi:10.1007/s10439-019-02328-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdet N, Deck C, Serre T, Perrin C, Llari M, Willinger R. 2014. In-depth realworld bicycle accident reconstruction. Int. J. Crashworthiness. 19(3):222–232. 10.1080/13588265.2013.805293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling J, Botting J. 2006. Porcine sebaceous cyst model: an inexpensve. Reproducible Skin Surg Simulator Dermatologiv Surg. 31(8):953–956. 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown D, Wolfgang C. 2011. Simulating what you see: combining computer modeling with video analysis. Proceedings of Joint International Conference MPTL 16; Sep 15–17; Ljubljana, Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Connor T, Stewart M, Burek R, Gilchrist DM. 2019. Influence of headform mass and inertia on the response to oblique impacts. Int J Crashworthiness. 24(6):677–698. 10.1080/13588265.2018.1525859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deck C, Bourdet N, Meyer F, Willinger R. 2019. Protection performance of bicycle helmets. J Safety Res. 71:67–77. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi I, Golnaraghi F, Wang GG. 2015. Factors influencing the oblique impact test of motorcycle helmets. Traffic Inj Prev. 16(4):404–408. doi:10.1080/15389588.2014.937804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge L, Huang Z, Wei H. 2011. Skin graft preservation. In: Spear M, editor. Skin grafts - indications, applications and current research intech. London: IntechOpen. p. 159–174.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall M, Walsh ES, Hoshizaki TB. 2012. Comparison between Hybrid III and Hodgson–WSU headforms by linear and angular dynamic impact response. Proc IMechE. 226(3–4):260–265. 10.1177/1754337112436901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klug C, Feist F, Tomasch E. 2015. Testing of bicycle helmets for preadolescents. IRCOBI Conference Proceedings; Sep 9–11; Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh A, Dowdell B, Svensson N. 1998. Pedal cycle helmet effectiveness: a field study of pedal cycle accidents. Accid Anal Prev. 30(2):161–168. 10.1016/s0001-4575. (97)00089-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pramudita J, Shimizu Y, Tanabe Y, Masato I, Watanabe R. 2014. Tensile properties of porcine skin in Dorsal and Ventral regions. J Jpn Soc Exp Mech. 14:245–250. doi:10.11395/jjsem.14.s245
   Google Scholar
• Rowson B, Rowson S, Duma SM. 2015. Hockey STAR: a methodology for assessing the biomechanical performance of hockey helmets. Ann Biomed Eng. 43(10):2429–2443. 10.1007/s10439-015-1278-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo D, Deck C, Willinger R. 2016. Brain injury tolerance limit based on computation of axonal strain. Accid Anal Prev. 92:53–70. 10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seery GE. 2002. Surgical anatomy of the scalp. Dermatol Surg. 28:581–587. doi:10.5005/jp/books/12881_19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigson H, Rizzi M, Ydenius A, Engström E, Anders Kullgren A. 2017. Consumer testing of bicycle helmets. IRCOBI Conference Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Tolhurst DE, Carstens MH, Greco RJ, Hurwitz DJ. 1991. The surgical anatomy of the scalp. Plast Reconstr Surg. 87(4):603–612. doi:10.1097/00006534-199208000-00036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trotta A, Annaidh N, Burek R, Pelgrims B, Ivens J. 2018b. Evaluation of the head-helmet sliding properties in an impact test. J Biomech. 75:28–34. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trotta A, Zouzias D, Bruyne DG, Annaidh NA. 2018a. The importance of the Scalp in head impact kinematics. Ann Biomed Eng. 46(6):831–810. 10.1007/s10439-018-2003-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trotta A, Annaidh A. Ní 2019. Mechanical characterisation of human and porcine scalp tissue at dynamic strain rates. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 100:103381 . doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zouzias D, Bruyne GD, Ivens J. 2017. A proposed motion tracking technique to assess the kinematics of oblique impacts. Proceedings of IRCOBI Conceference.
   Google Scholar