Rear-seat occupant demographics in rear impacts: Analysis of NASS-CDS

References

• Augenstein J, Perdeck E, Stratton J, Digges K, Bahouth G. 2003. Characteristics of crashes that increase the risk of serious injuries. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 47:561–576.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durbin DR, Chen I, Smith R, Elliott MR, Winston FK. 2005. Effects of seating position and appropriate restraint use on the risk of injury to children in motor vehicle crashes. Pediatrics. 115(3):e305–e309. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durbin DR, Jermakian JS, Kallan MJ, McCartt AT, Arbogast KB, Zonfrillo MR, Myers RK. 2015. Rear seat safety: variation in protection by occupant, crash and vehicle characteristics. Accid Anal Prev. 80:185–192. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans L, Frick MC. 1989. Relative fatality risk in different seating positions versus car model year. Accid Anal Prev. 21(6):581–587. doi:10.1016/0001-4575(89)90072-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman J, Michaelson J, Kent R, Kuppa S, Bostrom O. 2008. Occupant restraint in the rear seat: ATD responses to standard and pre-tensioning, force-limiting belt restraints. Annu. Proc. Assoc. Adv. Automotive Med., 52:141–154.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy WN, Kemper AR, Guettler AJ, Bianco ST, Lee EL. 2020. Hybrid III and THOR-50M responses in the rear seat during frontal crash sled tests. Washington (DC): Industry Meeting Presentation.
   Google Scholar
• Horsch JD. 1987. Evaluation of occupant protection from responses measured in laboratory tests. SAE 870222. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• IIHS 2017. Side impact crashworthiness evaluation crash test protocol (Version X).
   Google Scholar
• Jermakian J, Edwards M, Fein S. Maltese MR. 2019. Factors contributing to serious and fatal injuries in belted rear seat occupants in frontal crashes. Traffic Inj Prev. 20(sup1):S84–S91.
   Google Scholar
• Jermakian JC, Weast RA. 2018. Passenger use of and attitudes toward rear seat belts. J Safety Res. 64:113–119. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2017.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kononen DW, Flannagan CAC, Wang S. 2011. Identification and validation of a logistic regression model for predicting serious injuries associated with motor vehicle crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 43(1):112–122. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.07.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Pickrell TM. 2019. Occupant restraint use in 2017: results from the NOPUS controlled intersection study. Report No. DOT HS 812 594. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Malliaris AC, Digges DH, DeBlois JH. 1997. Relationships between crash casualties and crash attributes. SAE 970393. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfeld JA, Kang YS, Bolte J. 2018. Rear-facing child restraint system in rear impact sled tests. SAE 2018-01-1325. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA 2015. New car assessment program. Notice, 80 FR 78521, Docket No. NHTSA-2015-0119, December 16.
   Google Scholar
• Parenteau CS, Burnett R, Viano DC, Lau E. 2021a. Effect of ABTS and conventional seats on occupant injury in rear impacts: Analysis of Field and Test Data. Traffic Inj Prev.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parenteau CS, Viano DC, Burnett R. 2021b. Second-row occupant responses with and without intrusion in rear sled and crash tests. Traffic Inj Prev. 22(1):43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parenteau C, Stephens G, Yaek J, Gregory S. 2020. The effect of fmvss 301r on vehicle structure in rear impact. SAE 2020-01-1226. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Parenteau C, Viano D. 2020. Update on second-row children responses in rear and frontal crashes with a focus on the potential effect of stiffening front seat structures. SAE 2020-01-1215. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Pickrell TM, Choi E-H, KC S. 2016. Occupant restraint use in 2014: Results from the NOPUS controlled intersection study. Report No. DOT HS 812 244. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens G, Michalski D, Parenteau CS, Burnett R. 2020. A mathematical model to assess occupant compartment intrusion on rear occupant responses in rear crashes. IMECE2020-24613.
   Google Scholar
• Tatem WM, Gabler HC. 2017. Preliminary analysis of serious-to-fatal injury in rear impact crashes in the United States. 2017 IRCOBI Conference Proceedings; 2017 Sept 13–15; Antwerp, Belgium: International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI).
   Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Parenteau CS, Prasad P, Burnett R. 2008. Occupant responses in high-speed rear crashes: analysis of government-sponsored tests. SAE 2008-01-0188. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Parenteau CS. 2008a. Fatalities by seating position and principal direction of force for 1st, 2nd and 3rd row occupants. SAE 2008-01-1850. Warrendale (PA): SAE.
   Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Parenteau CS. 2008b. Serious injury in very-low and very-high speed rear impacts. SAE 2008-01-1485. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Parenteau CS. 2018. Rear-seat occupant responses in nhtsa rear crash tests. SAE 2018-01-1330. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Ray G, Pintar FA, Myklebust JB, Sances A. 1989. Stiffness and strain energy criteria to evaluate the threshold of injury to an intervertebral joint. J Biomech. 22(2):135–142. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(89)90036-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar