User perceptions of automated Truck-Mounted attenuators: Implications on work zone safety

References

• American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) 2019. 2018 National work zone fatal crashes & fatalities [Accessed 2020 July 11]. Available at: https://www.workzonesafety.org/crash-information/work-zone-fatal-crashes-fatalities/#national.
   Google Scholar
• Bham GH, Leu MC, Vallati M, Mathur DR. 2014. Driving simulator validation of driver behavior with limited safe vantage points for data collection in work zones. J Saf Res. 49:53.e1–60. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2014.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M, Avery P, Sturgeon P. 2014. Enhanced work zone safety through cooperative autonomous vehicle systems. Paper presented at: 2014 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE); November 3-7, Vienna, Austria. p. 966–967. doi:10.1109/ICCVE.2014.7297701
   Google Scholar
• Chang GL, Kang KP. 2005. Evaluation of intelligent transportation system deployments for work zone operations. Baltimore, MD: Maryland State Highway Administration. Report No. MD-05-SP208B4H-S
   Google Scholar
• Chu L, Kim HK, Chung Y, Recker W. 2005. Evaluation of effectiveness of automated work zone information systems. Transport Res Record. 1911(1):73–81. doi:10.1177/0361198105191100108
   Google Scholar
• Cottrell BH. 2015. Investigation of truck mounted attenuator (TMA) crashes in work zones in Virginia. Richmond, VA: Federal Highway Administration. Report No. FHWA/VTRC 16-R7
   Google Scholar
• Crews DE, Russ MJ. 2020. The impact of individual differences on multitasking ability. IJPPM. 69(6):1301–1319. doi:10.1108/IJPPM-04-2019-0191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins RA, Gullone E. 2000. Why we should not use 5-point Likert scales: The case for subjective quality of life measurement. Proceedings of Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities. March 8-10, Singapore. p. 74–93.
   Google Scholar
• Eseonu C, Gambatese J, Nnaji C. 2018. Reducing highway construction fatalities through improved adoption of safety technologies (CPWR Small Study No. 17-4-PS). Silver Spring, MD: Center for Construction Research and Training;
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2019. FHWA work zone facts and statistics 2019. [Accessed 2020 July 10]. Available at: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/wz/resources/facts_stats.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Huff RA, Prybutok VR. 2008. Information systems project management decision making: The influence of experience and risk propensity. Project Manag J. 39(2):34–47. doi:10.1002/pmj.20050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivi A, Olidis C, Eng P. 2015. Challenges in ensuring worker safety in active roadway work zones. Paper presented at: 2015 Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada; September 27-30, 2015. Charlottetown, PEI.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JD, See KA. 2004. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. HFES. 46(1):50–80. doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lochrane TW, Al-Deek H, Dailey DJ, Bared J. 2014. Using a living laboratory to support transportation research for a freeway work zone. J Transp Eng. 2014140(7):04014024. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000674
   Google Scholar
• Nnaji C, Gambatese J, Lee HW, Zhang F. 2020. Improving construction work zone safety using technology: A systematic review of applicable technologies. J Traffic Transport Eng. 7(1):61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Noy IY, Shinar D, Horrey WJ. 2018. Automated driving: Safety blind spots. Saf Sci. 102:68–78. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigman JG, Agent KR. 1988. Review of Work Zone Literature. Frankfort, KY: Kentucky Transportation Cabinet. Report No. UKTREP-88-5.
   Google Scholar
• Swake J. 2013. Driving simulation: a mechanism for understanding driver response to mobile barriers in work zones [MS thesis]. Oregon State University.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Labor: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 2020. Commonly used statistics. [accessed 2020 July 6]. Available at: https://www.osha.gov/data/commonstats.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Zhang K, Min H, Wang Z, Zhao X, Liu P. 2018. What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment. Transport Res Part C Emerg Technol. 95:320–334. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, Fang D, Wang X. 2008. A method to identify strategies for the improvement of human safety behavior by considering safety climate and personal experience. Saf Sci. 46(10):1406–1419. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2007.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar