Dynamic metrics to differentiate booster performance

References

• American Academy of Pediatrics. Car seats: product listings for 2017. [accessed 2017 Oct 2]. https://www.healthychildren.org/English/safety-prevention/on-the-go/Pages/Car-Safety-Seats-Product-Listing.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Arbogast KB, Jermakian JS, Kallan MF, Durbin DR. 2009. Effectiveness of belt positioning booster seats: an updated assessment. Pediatrics. 124(5):1281–1286. doi:https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash J, Abdelilah Y, Crandall J, Parent D, Sherwood C, Kallieris D. 2009. Comparison of anthropomorphic test dummies with a pediatric cadaver restrained by a three-point belt in frontal sled tests. Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference Proceedings, ESV Paper 09–0362, June 15–18, ESV Stuttgart, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Beck B, Brown J. Bilston 2012. Objective measures for determining submarining and abdominal injury in hybrid III crash test dummies. IRCOBI Conference Proceedings; September 12–14, Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Benedetti M, Klinich KD, Manary MA, Flannagan CA. 2019. Factors affecting child injury risk in motor-vehicle crashes. Stapp Car Crash J. 63.
   Google Scholar
• Durbin DR, Elliott MR, Winston FK. 2003. Belt-positioning booster seats and reduction in risk of injury among children in vehicle crashes. JAMA. 289(21):2835–2840. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.21.2835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Docket U.S. DOT/NHTSA - Child Frontal Impact Sled-Feb 2015. Posted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration on Mar 17, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hagedorn A, Stammen J. 2015. Comparative evaluation of 6-year-old Hybrid III and DAPRR prototype ATD abdomen/pelvis components. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. DOT HS 812 088.
   Google Scholar
• Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Booster seat belt fit evaluation protocol (version III). Ruckersville (VA). [accessed 2018 Mar 23]. http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/technical‐information/boosterprotocols.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin A, Prasad P, Mertz HJ. 1997. Injury risk curves for children and adults in frontal and rear collisions. Proceedings of the 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale PA; Lake Buena Vista, FL; p. 13–30.
   Google Scholar
• Jermakian JS, Edwards MA. Kinematics comparison between the hybrid III 6 year-old with standard pelvis and modified pelvis with gel abdomen in booster sled test. #IRC-17-38, IRCOBI Conference Proceedings; September 13–15, Antwerp, Belgium; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Klinich KD, Benedetti M, Manary MA, Flannagan CA. 2017. Rating child passenger safety laws relative to best practice recommendations for occupant protection. Traffic Inj Prev. 18(4):406–411. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2016.1203427 Epub 2016 Aug 30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinich KD, Reed MP, Manary MA, Orton NR. 2010. Development and testing of a more realistic pelvis for the hybrid III 6-year-old ATD. Traffic Inj Prev. 11(6):606–612. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2010.506502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li HR, Pickrell T. 2018. The 2017 national survey of the use of booster seats. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. DOT HS 812 617.
   Google Scholar
• Manary MA, Klinich KD, Boyle KJ, Orton NR, Eby B, Weir Q. 2018. Development of a surrogate shoulder belt retractor for sled testing. University of Michigan. UMTRI-2016-21.
   Google Scholar
• Menon RA, Ghati YS, Roberts D. 2005. Performance evaluation of various high back booster seats tested at 56 kph. Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference Proceedings ESV Paper No. 05-0366; June 6–9, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2015. Memorandum re: modifications of the preliminary drawings of an upgraded standard seat assembly to evaluate child restraint systems. Aug 25. Regulations.gov/NHTSA-2013-0055-0008.
   Google Scholar
• Park CK, Morgan RM, Digges KH. 2011. Analysis of child dummy responses and CRS performance in frontal NCAP tests. Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference Proceedings, ESV Paper Number 11–0142; June 13–16, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Rasband WS. 1997–2018. ImageJ US. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/.
   Google Scholar
• Rouhana SW, McCleary JD, Jedrzejczak EA. 1990. Assessing submarining and abdominal injury risk in the hybrid III family of dummies: part II - development of the small female frangible abdomen. Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Stapp Car Crash Conference. SAE Technical Paper No. 902317; November 4–7, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Seacrist T, Balasubramanian S, Garcia-Espana JF, Maltese MR, Lopez-Valdes FJ, Kent RW, Tanji H, Higuchi K, Arbogast KB. 2010. Kinematic comparison of pediatric human volunteers and the Hybrid III 6-year-old anthropomorphic test device. Ann Adv Automot Med. 54:97–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar