References
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2021. National syndromic surveillance program. [accessed 2021 Mar 5]. https://www.cdc.gov/nssp/overview.html.
- Doucette ML, Tucker A, Auguste ME, Watkins A, Green C, Pereira FE, Borrup KT, Shapiro D, Lapidus G. 2021. Initial impact of Covid-19's stay-at-home order on motor vehicle traffic and crash patterns in Connecticut: an interrupted time series analysis. Inj Prev. 27(1):3–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2020-043945
- Federal Highway Administration. 2021. Travel monitoring [accessed 2021 Jul 2]. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/travel_monitoring/tvt.cfm.
- Hilbe JM. 2011. Negative binomial regression. 2nd ed. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
- Hsiehchen D, Espinoza M, Slovic P. 2020. Political partisanship and mobility restriction during the covid-19 pandemic. Public Health. 187:111–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.08.009
- Jacobsen GD, Jacobsen KH. 2020. Statewide covid-19 stay-at-home orders and population mobility in the United States. World Med Health Policy. 12(4):347–356. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.350
- Kamine TH, Rembisz A, Barron RJ, Baldwin C, Kromer M. 2020. Decrease in trauma admissions with covid-19 pandemic. West J Emerg Med. 21(4):819–822.
- Moreland A, Herlihy C, Tynan MA, Sunshine G, McCord RF, Hilton C, Poovey J, Werner AK, Jones CD, Fulmer EB, et al. 2020. Timing of state and territorial covid-19 stay-at-home orders and changes in population movement—United States, March 1-May 31, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 69(35):1198–1203. doi:https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6935a2
- Parr S, Wolshon B, Renne J, Murray-Tuite P, Kim K. 2020. Traffic impacts of the covid-19 pandemic: statewide analysis of social separation and activity restriction. Nat Hazards Rev. 21(3):04020025. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000409
- Qureshi AI, Huang W, Khan S, Lobanova I, Siddiq F, Gomez CR, Suri MFK. 2020. Mandated societal lockdown and road traffic accidents. Accid Anal Prev. 146:105747. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105747
- Rudisill TM, Zhu M, Chu H. 2019. Association between cellphone use while driving legislation and self-reported behaviour among adult drivers in USA: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 9(2):e023456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023456
- Sen S, Karaca-Mandic P, Georgiou A. 2020. Association of stay-at-home orders with covid-19 hospitalizations in 4 states. JAMA. 323(24):2522–2524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.9176
- Shilling F. 2020. Special report (update): impact of covid19 mitigation on numbers and costs of California traffic crashes. Davis (CA): Road Ecology Center University of California Davis.
- Stavrinos D, McManus B, Mrug S, He H, Gresham B, Albright MG, Svancara AM, Whittington C, Underhill A, White DM. 2020. Adolescent driving behavior before and during restrictions related to covid-19. Accid Anal Prev. 144:105686. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105686
- Stoker S, McDaniel D, Crean T, Maddox J, Jawanda G, Krentz N, Best J, Speicher M, Siwiec R. 2020. Effect of shelter-in-place orders and the covid-19 pandemic on orthopaedic trauma at a community level II trauma center. J Orthop Trauma. 34(9):e336–e342. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001860
- Sutherland M, McKenney M, Elkbuli A. 2020. Vehicle related injury patterns during the covid-19 pandemic: what has changed? Am J Emerg Med. 38(9):1710–1714. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.06.006
- Thomas FD, Berning A, Darrah J, Graham LA, Blomberg RD, Griggs C, Crandall M, Schulman C, Kozar R, Neavyn M, et al. 2020. Drug and alcohol prevalence in seriously and fatally injured road users before and during the covid-19 public health emergency. Washington (DC): United States Department of Transportation.
- United States Census Bureau. 2020. County population by characteristics: 2010-2019 [accessed 2020 Jul 12]. https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/time-series/demo/popest/2010s-counties-detail.html.
- Wang L, Xu J, Qin P. 2014. Will a driving restriction policy reduce car trips?-the case study of Beijing, China. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 67:279–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.07.014
- Yagil D. 1998a. Gender and age-related differences in attitudes toward traffic laws and traffic violations. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 1(2):123–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(98)00010-2
- Yagil D. 1998b. Instrumental and normative motives for compliance with traffic laws among young and older drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 30(4):417–424. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(98)00003-7