References
- Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 50(2):179–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
- Bergmark RW, Gliklich E, Guo R, Gliklich RE. 2016. Texting while driving: the development and validation of the distracted driving survey and risk score among young adults. Inj Epidemiol. 3(1):7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-016-0073-8
- Burstein P. 2003. The impact of public opinion on public policy: a review and an agenda. Political Res Q. 56(1):29–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600103
- Caird JK, Simmons SM, Wiley K, Johnston KA, Horrey WJ. 2018. Does talking on a cell phone, with a passenger, or dialing affect driving performance? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Hum Factors. 60(1):101–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817748145
- Carpenter CJ. 2013. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the “But you are free” compliance-gaining technique. Commun Stud. 64(1):6–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2012.727941
- Curry AE, Peek-Asa C, Hamann CJ, Mirman JH. 2015. Effectiveness of parent-focused interventions to increase teen driver safety: a critical review. J Adol Health. 57(1):S6–S14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.01.003
- Delgado MK, McDonald CC, Winston FK, Halpern SD, Buttenheim AM, Setubal C, Huang Y, Saulsgiver KA, Lee Y-C. 2018. Attitudes on technological, social, and behavioral economic strategies to reduce cellphone use among teens while driving. Traffic Inj Prev. 19(6):569–576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1458100
- Delhomme P, Verlhiac J-F, Martha C. 2009. Are drivers' comparative risk judgments about speeding realistic? J Safety Res. 40(5):333–339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2009.09.003
- Dillard JP, Shen L. 2005. On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Commun Monogr. 72(2):144–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815
- Dingus TA, Guo F, Lee S, Antin JF, Perez M, Buchanan-King M, Hankey J. 2016. Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 113(10):2636–2641. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1513271113
- Fernandes R, Hatfield J, Soames Job RF. 2010. A systematic investigation of the differential predictors for speeding, drink-driving, driving while fatigued, and not wearing a seat belt, among young drivers. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 13(3):179–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2010.04.007
- Gallagher KM, Updegraff JA. 2012. Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: a meta-analytic review. Ann Behav Med. 43(1):101–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7
- Hall MG, Sheeran P, Noar SM, Boynton MH, Ribisl KM, Parada H, Jr Johnson TO, Brewer NT. 2018. Negative affect, message reactance and perceived risk: how do pictorial cigarette pack warnings change quit intentions? Tob Control. 27(e2):e136–e142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053972
- Levin IP, Schneider SL, Gaeth GJ. 1998. All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 76(2):149–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804
- National Center for Statistics and Analysis. 2019. 2018 fatal motor vehicle crashes: overview. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
- Overton TL, Rives TE, Hecht C, Shafi S, Gandhi RR. 2015. Distracted driving: prevalence, problems, and prevention. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 22(3):187–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2013.879482
- Oviedo-Trespalacios O, Williamson A, King M. 2019. User preferences and design recommendations for voluntary smartphone applications to prevent distracted driving. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 64:47–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.018
- Richard CM, Magee K, Bacon-Abdelmoteleb P, Brown Jl. 2018. Countermeasures that work: a highway safety countermeasure guide for state highway safety offices. 9th ed. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. Dot Hs 812 478.
- Rosenstock IM. 1966. Why people use health services. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 44(3):94–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3348967
- Sanbonmatsu DM, Strayer DL, Behrends AA, Ward N, Watson JM. 2016. Why drivers use cell phones and support legislation to restrict this practice. Accid Anal Prev. 92:22–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.010
- Schroeder P, Wilbur M, Peña R. 2018. National survey on distracted driving attitudes and behaviors – 2015. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. DOT HS 812 461.
- Shevlin BRK, Goodwin KA. 2019. Past behavior and the decision to text while driving among young adults. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 60:58–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.027
- Tapp A, Nancarrow C, Davis A. 2015. Support and compliance with 20mph speed limits in Great Britain. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 31:36–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.03.002
- Weller JA, Shackleford C, Dieckmann N, Slovic P. 2013. Possession attachment predicts cell phone use while driving. Health Psychol. 32(4):379–387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029265
- Windschitl PD, Wells GL. 1996. Measuring psychological uncertainty: verbal versus numeric methods. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2(4):343–364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.2.4.343