The effectiveness of alcohol monitoring as a treatment for driving-while-intoxicated (DWI) offenders: A literature review and synthesis

References

• Averill F, Brown TG, Robertson RD, Tchomgang A, Berbiche D, Nadeau L, Ouimet MC. 2018. Transdermal alcohol monitoring combined with contingency management for driving while impaired offenders: a pilot randomized controlled study. Traffic Inj Prev. 19(5):455–461. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1448079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett NP, Celio MA, Tidey JW, Murphy JG, Colby SM, Swift RMA. 2017. A preliminary randomized controlled trial of contingency management for alcohol use reduction using a transdermal alcohol sensor. Addiction. 112(6):1025–1035. https://doi.org/https://doi-org.proxy.uchicago.edu/10.1111/add.13767. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean P, Brown G, Hallinan P, Becerra S, Lewis D. 2017. Improved recovery of repeat intoxicated drivers using fingernails and blood spots to monitor alcohol and other substance abuse. Traffic Inj Prev. 18(1):9–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2016.1190014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck KH, Kelley-Baker T, Voas RB. 2015. DUI offenders' experience with an ignition interlock program: comparing those who have and have not adapted from their primary drinking location. Traffic Inj Prev. 16(4):329–335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2014.948617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck KH, Rauch WJ, Baker EA, Williams AF. 1999. Effects of ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses: a randomized trial in Maryland. Am J Public Health. 89(11):1696–1700. doi:https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.89.11.1696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanova-Powell T, Hedlund J, Leaf W, Tison J. 2015. Evaluation of state ignition interlock programs: interlock use analyses from 28 States, 2006–2011. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, & Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, May, Report No. DOT HS 812 145.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2015 Dec 2. Alcohol Interlocks. https://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/calculator/factsheet/interlocks.html.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty DM, Hill-Kapturczak N, Liang Y, Karns TE, Cates SE, Lake SL, Mullen J, Roache JD. 2014. Use of continuous transdermal alcohol monitoring during a contingency management procedure to reduce excessive alcohol use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 142:301–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.06.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty DM, Karns TE, Mullen J, Liang Y, Lake SL, Roache JD, Hill-Kapturczak N. 2015. Transdermal alcohol concentration data collected during a contingency management program to reduce at-risk drinking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 148:77–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.12.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fell JC, McKnight AS. 2013. Transdermal alcohol monitoring (TAM) in compliance with abstinence: records from 250,000 offenders in the United States. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Australian Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference, Brisbane, QLD.
   Google Scholar
• Flango VE, Cheesman FL. 2009. Effectiveness of the scram alcohol monitoring device: a preliminary test. Drug Court Review. 6(2):109–134.
   Google Scholar
• Kilmer B, Nicosia N, Heaton P, Midgette G. 2013. Efficacy of frequent monitoring with swift, certain, and modest sanctions for violations: insights from South Dakota's 24/7 Sobriety Project. Am J Public Health. 103(1):e37–e43. doi:https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300989
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koffarnus MN, Bickel WK, Kablinger AS. 2018. Remote alcohol monitoring to facilitate incentive-based treatment for alcohol use disorder: a randomized trial. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 42(12):2423–2431. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.13891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maenhout TM, Poll A, Vermassen T, De Buyzere ML, Delanghe JR. 2014. Usefulness of indirect alcohol biomarkers for predicting recidivism of drunk-driving among previously convicted drunk-driving offenders: results from the recidivism of alcohol-impaired driving (ROAD) study. Addiction. 109(1):71–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques P, Tippetts S, Allen J, Javors M, Alling C, Yegles M, Pragst F, Wurst F. 2010. Estimating driver risk using alcohol biomarkers, interlock blood alcohol concentration tests and psychometric assessments: initial descriptives. Addiction. 105(2):226–239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02738.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCartt AT, Leaf WA, Farmer CM. 2018. Effects of Washington State's alcohol ignition interlock laws on DUI recidivism: an update. Traffic Inj Prev. 19(7):665–674. https://doi.org/https://doi-org.proxy.uchicago.edu/10.1080/15389588.2018.1496426. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1496426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nochajski TH, Manning AR, Voas R, Taylor EP, Scherer M, Romano E. 2020. The impact of interlock installation on driving behavior and drinking behavior related to driving. Traffic Inj Prev. 21(7):419–424. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2020.1802020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauch W, Ahlin E, Zador P, Howard J, Duncan G. 2011. Effects of administrative ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses. J Exp Criminol. 7(2):127–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9118-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth R, Marques PR, Voas RB. 2009. A note on the effectiveness of the house-arrest alternative for motivating DWI offenders to install ignition interlocks. J Safety Res. 40(6):437–441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2009.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar