Potential effect of pre-activated muscles under a far-side lateral impact

References

• Davidsson J, et al. 2021. Validated and computationally robust active HBMs. Deliverable D3.2, OSCCAR Project; Grant Agreement No. 768947.
   Google Scholar
• Devane K, Johnson D, Gayzik FS. 2019. Validation of a simplified human body model in relaxed and braced conditions in low-speed frontal sled tests. Traffic Inj Prev. 20(8):832–837. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2019.1655733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devane K, Koya B, Gayzik FS. 2020. Active human body models and associated risk of injury for out-of-position occupants in frontal crash. Presented at: 8th International Symposium Human Modeling and Simulation in Automotive Engineering; 19th–20th November.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing CL, Thomas DJ. 1973. Human Head and Neck Response to Impact Acceleration. Pensacola (FL): Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory. NAMRL Monograph 21.
   Google Scholar
• Forman JL, Kent RW, Mroz K, Pipkorn B, Bostrom O, Seguí-Gómez M. 2012. Predicting rib fracture risk with whole-body finite element models: development and preliminary evaluation of a probabilistic analytical framework. Ann Adv Automot Med. 56:109–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forman JL, Lopez-Valdes F, Lessley DJ, Riley P, Sochor M, Heltzel S, Ash J, Perz R, Kent RW, Seacrist T, et al. 2013. Occupant kinematics and shoulder belt retention in far-side lateral and oblique collisions: a parametric study. Stapp Car Crash J. 57:343–385.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghaffari G, Brolin K, Brase D, Pipkorn B, Svanberg B, Jakobsson L, Davidsson J. 2018. Passenger kinematics in lane change with braking manoeuvres using two belt configurations: standard and reversible pre-pretensioner. In: Proceedings: IRCOBI Conference, September; Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• González-García M, Weber J, Peldschus S. 2020b. Numerical study to quantify the potential influence of pre-activated muscles during the in-crash phase. Presented at: 8th International Symposium Human Modeling and Simulation in Automotive Engineering; 19th–20th November.
   Google Scholar
• González-García M, Weber J, Sugiyama T, Peldschus S, Sandoz B. 2020a. Closing the gap between sled and in‐vehicle volunteer tests under moderate lateral accelerations. In: Proceedings: IRCOBI Conference, September.
   Google Scholar
• Günther M, Runder H. 2003. Synthesis of two-dimensional human walking: a test of the λ-model. Biol Cybern. 89:89–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatze H. 1978. A general myocybernetic control model of skeletal muscle. Biol Cybern. 28(3):143–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber P, Kirschbichler S, Prüggler A, Steidl T. 2015. Passenger kinematics in braking, lane change and oblique driving maneuver. In: Proceedings: IRCOBI Conference, September; Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Kato D, Nakahira Y, Iwamoto M. 2017. A study of muscle control with two feedback controls for posture and reaction force for more accurate prediction of occupant kinematics in low-speed frontal impacts. In: Proceedings: 25th ESV Conference, June; Detroit, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson E, Iraeus J, Fice J, Pipkorn B, Jakobsson L, Brynskog E, Brolin K, Davidsson J. 2019. Active human body model predictions compared to volunteer response in experiments with braking, lane change, and combined manouvres. In: Proceedings: IRCOBI Conference, September; Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Mattucci SFE, Moulton JA, Chandrashekar N, Cronin DS. 2012. Strain rate dependent properties of younger human cervical spine ligaments. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 10:216–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie X, Cheng J, Chen W, Weerasooriya T. 2010. Dynamic tensile response of porcine muscle. J Appl Mech. 78(2):021009. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Rapela D, Donlon J-P, Forman JL. 2019. PMHS and WorldSID kinematic and injury response in far-side events in a vehicle-based test environment. Stapp Car Crash J. 63:83–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandoz B, Sugiyama T, Weber J. 2019. Upper body in vivo kinematics during moderate lateral accelerations – towards active finite element human body model validation. In: Proceeding: IRCOBI Conference, September; Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Song B, Chen W, Ge Y, Weerasooriya T. 2007. Dynamic and quasi-static compressive response of porcine muscle. J Biomech. 40(13):2999–3005. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugiyama T, Weber J, Sandoz B, Bensler H-P. 2018. Validation of a reactive finite element human body model under moderate lateral loading. Presented at: 7th International Symposium Human Modeling and Simulation in Automotive Engineering; November; Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• THUMS User Community. 2021. TUC-project. THUMS User Community; [accessed March]. https://tuc-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Takhounts EG, Craig MJ, Moorhouse K, McFadden J, Hasija V. 2013. Development of brain injury criteria (BrIC). Stapp Car Crash J. 57:243–266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Loocke M, Lyons CG, Simms CK. 2008. Viscoelastic properties of passive skeletal muscle in compression: stress-relaxation behavior and constitutive modelling. J Biomech. 41(7):1555–1156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wismans J, Phippens M, van Oorschot E, Kallieris, R. M. 1987. Comparison of human volunteer and cadaver head-neck response in frontal flexion. SAE Trans. 96(3):1323–1335.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2018. Global status report on road safety 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Yigit E. 2018. Reaktives FE-Menschmodell im Insassenschutz. Wiesbaden (Germany): Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21226_1-1
   Google Scholar