Study on the influence of seating orientation during frontal impacts by child occupant human body model response analysis

References

• Arbogast K, Wozniak S, Locey CM, Maltese MR, Zonfrillo MR. 2012. Head injury contact points for restrained child occupants. Traffic Inj Prev. 13(2):172–181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2011.642834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beillas P, Chevalier MC, Yin X, Collot J, Giordano C, et al. 2017. [D1.2] Final child models [Research Report]. IFSTTAR - Institut Français des Sciences et Technologies des Transports, de l’Aménagement et des Réseaux hal-01726327.
   Google Scholar
• Beillas P, Giordano C, Alvarez V, Li X, Ying X, Chevalier M-C, Kirscht S, Kleiven S. 2016. Development and performance of the PIPER scalable child human body models. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference Protection of Children in Cars, Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Dibb AT, Cutcliffe HC, Luck JF, Cox CA, Myers BS, Bass CR, Arbogast KB, Seacrist T, Nightingale RW. 2014. Pediatric head and neck dynamics in frontal impact: analysis of important mechanical factors and proposed neck performance corridors for six and ten year old ATD. Traffic Inj Prev. 15(4):386–394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2013.824568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP). 2018. Mobile progressive deformable barrier frontal impact testing protocol. Version 1.0; November.
   Google Scholar
• European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP). 2019a. Assessment protocol – child occupant protection. Version 7.3; April.
   Google Scholar
• European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP). 2019b. Testing protocol – child occupant protection. Version 7.3; May.
   Google Scholar
• Gayzik FS, Koya B, Davis ML. 2018. A preliminary study of human model head and neck response to frontal loading in nontraditional occupant seating configurations. Traffic Inj Prev. 19(sup1):S183–S186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1426915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirz M, Rossbacher P. 2019. Integrated approach supporting virtual conception of passenger ergonomics in automated driving cars. In: Stanton N, editor. Advances in human aspects of transportation. AHFE 2018. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 786. p. 434–444. Cham (Switzerland): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_39.
   Google Scholar
• Huang YY, Liu C, Pressley JC. 2019. Restraint use and injury in forward and rear-facing infants and toddlers involved in a fatal motor vehicle crash on a U. S. roadway. Inj Epidemiol. 6(Suppl 1):28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-019-0200-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jorlöv S, Bohman K, Larsson A. 2017. Seating positions and activities in highly automated cars. A qualitative study of future automated driving scenarios. In: International Research Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact, IRCOBI Conference, IRC-17-11, p. 13, Belgium: Antwerp.
   Google Scholar
• Koppel S, Jimenez Octavio J, Bohman K, Logan D, Raphael W, Quintana Jimenez L, Lopez-Valdes F. 2019. Seating configuration and position preferences in fully automated vehicles. Traffic Inj Prev. 20(sup2):S103–S109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2019.1625336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesire P, Johannsen H, Willinger R, Longton A. 2012. CASPER–improvement of child safety in cars. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1235
   Google Scholar
• Lesire P, Johannsen H, Willinger R, Longton A, Kirk A, Beillas P, et al. 2013. Child Advanced Safety Project for European Roads (CASPER): better knowledge and better tools to improve the real protection of children in cars. International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) 23rd Conference, Seoul, Republic of Korea, Paper Number 13-0426. p. 1825–39. https://hdl.handle.net/2134/24728.
   Google Scholar
• Lubbe N, Jeppsson H, Ranjbar A, Fredriksson J, Bärgman J, Östling M. 2018. Predicted road traffic fatalities in Germany: the potential and limitations of vehicle safety technologies from passive safety to highly automated driving. IRCOBI Conference, IRC-18-11, p. 36, Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Ommaya AK, Goldsmith W, Thibault L. 2002. Biomechanics and neuropathology of adult and paediatric head injury. Br J Neurosurg. 16(3):220–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02688690220148824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östling M, Larsson A. 2019. Occupant activities and sitting positions in automated vehicles in China and Sweden. Proceedings of the 26th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, June 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Position and Personalize Advanced Human Body Models for Injury Prediction (PIPER). 2017. Models for Injury Prediction; EC Project FP7/2013-2017 [accessed 2019 June 7]. http://www.piper-project.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart CL, Moscariello MA, Hansen KW, Moulton SL. 2014. Infant car safety seats and risk of head injury. J Pediatr Surg. 49(1):193–197, discussion 196–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.09.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takhounts EG, Craig MJ, Moorhouse K, McFadden J, Hasija V. 2013. Development of brain injury criteria (BrIC). Stapp Car Crash J. 57:243–266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trosseille X, Lehmann I. 2012. D4.4 Report of the feasibility from physical testing to numerical criteria. CASPER project deliveble 08/10/12.
   Google Scholar
• White NA, Moreno DP, Gayzik FS, Stitzel JD. 2015. Cross-sectional neck response of a total human body FE model during simulated frontal and side automobile impacts. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 18:293–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2013.792918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmazcoban IK. 2016. The reliability of autonomous vehicles under collisions. Autonomous vehicle. Andrzej Zak, IntechOpen. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/51350
   Google Scholar