Significance of tractor-trailer impacts to the rear of light vehicles

References

• Burnett R, Carter J, Roberts V, Myers B. 2004. The influence of seatback characteristics on cervical injury risk in severe rear impacts. Accid Anal Prev. 36(4):591–601. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00066-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camden MC, Medina-Flintsch A, Hickman JS, Miller AM, Hanowski RJ. 2017. Leveraging large-truck technology and engineering to realize safety gains: automatic emergency braking systems. Blacksburg (VA): Virginia Tech Transportation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Evans L. 1991. Traffic safety and the driver. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Every JL, Salaani MK, Barickman FS, Elsasser DH, Guenther DA, Heydinger GJ, Rao SJ. 2014. Braking behavior of truck drivers in crash imminent scenarios. SAE Int J Commercial Vehicles. 7(2):487–499.
   Google Scholar
• Ference J, Najm W. 2005. Overview and evaluation of the Automotive Collision Avoidance System Field Operational Test (ACAS FOT). Washington DC: SAE International, Government/Industry Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Grove K, Atwood J, Hill P, Fitch G, Blanco M, Guo F, Russell S, Marchese Bartholomew P, Richards T. 2016, June. Field study of heavy-vehicle crash avoidance systems. Washington DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Final report, Report No. DOT HS 812 280.
   Google Scholar
• Haney J. 1979. Government efforts to regulate heavy truck braking. University of Michigan Highway Safety Research Institute. HSRI Res Rev. 9(6).
   Google Scholar
• Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. 2020, September 3. Study shows front crash prevention works for large trucks too. https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/study-shows-front-crash-prevention-works-for-large-trucks-too [accessed 2021 Feb 10].
   Google Scholar
• Jermakian JS. 2012. Crash avoidance potential of four large truck technologies. Accid Anal Prev. 49:338–346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehn M, Hummel T, Bende J. 2011. Advanced driver assistance systems for trucks – benefit estimation from real-life accidents. Proceedings of the 22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Washington DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy RW, Limpert R, Segel L. 1971. Development of braking performance requirements for buses, trucks, and tractor-trailers. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE 710046.
   Google Scholar
• Najm WG, Sen B, Smith JD, Campbell BN. 2003. Analysis of light vehicle crashes and pre-crash scenarios based on the 2000 General Estimates System. Washington DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. DOT VNTSC NHTSA 02 04, DOT HS 809 573.
   Google Scholar
• Najm WJ, Steans MD, Howarth H, Koopman J, Hitz J. 2006. Evaluation of an automotive rear collision avoidance system. DOT-VNTSC-NHTSA-06-01, DOT HS 810 5692006, March. Washington (D): CNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Statistics and Analysis. 2021, August. Traffic safety facts 2019: a compilation of motor vehicle crash data. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. DOT HS 813 141. Washington DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. 2003. Initiatives to address the mitigation of vehicle Rollover, June. Washington DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. 2015, October 16. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard, automatic emergency braking. Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0099, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Rules and Regulations. Fed Regist. 80(200):62487–62488.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. 2022. Early Estimate of Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities for the First 9 Months (January–September) of 2021. Traffic Safety Facts, DOT HS 813 240. Washington DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Padmanaban J, Burnett R, Levitt A. 2016. Seatback strength as a predictor of serious injury risk to belted drivers and rear seat occupants in rear-impact crashes. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE 2016-01-1512.
   Google Scholar
• Parenteau C, Croteau J, Zolock J. 2020. The effect of crash severity and structural intrusion on ATD responses in rear crashes. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE 2020-01-1224.
   Google Scholar
• Parenteau CS, Viano DC. 2021. Serious head, neck and spine injuries in rear impacts: frequency and sources. IRC-21-10, IRCOBI Conference. http://ircobi.org/wordpress/proceedings/
   Google Scholar
• Parenteau CS, Viano DC, Burnett R, Lau E. 2021. Second-row occupant responses with and without intrusion in rear sled and crash tests. Traffic Inj Prev. 22(1):43–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2020.1842380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poe M. (contact). 2018. Cost and weight analysis of heavy vehicle Forward Collision Warning (FCW) and Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) systems for heavy trucks. Ricardo Inc. Report to NHTSA. Washington DC: DOT, 20590, contract number: DTNH2216D00037, task order: DTNH2217F00147.
   Google Scholar
• Tatem WM, Gabler HC. 2017. Preliminary analysis of serious-to-fatal injury in rear impact crashes in the United States. Conference proceedings International Research Council. International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury. http://ircobi.org/wordpress/proceedings/
   Google Scholar
• Teoh ER. 2021. Effectiveness of front crash prevention systems in reducing large truck real-world crash rates. Traffic Inj Prev. 22(4):284–289. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2021.1893700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Congress. 2021. Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act: federal-aid highways, highway safety programs and transit programs and for other purposes. H.R.3684, 117^th Congress, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Parenteau CS. 2008a. Fatalities by seating position and principal direction of force for 1st, 2nd and 3rd row occupants. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE 2008-01-1850.
   Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Parenteau CS. 2008b. Serious injury in very-low and very-high speed rear impacts. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE 2008-01-1485.
   Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Parenteau CS. 2010. Severe-fatal injury risks in crashes with two front-seat occupants by seatbelt use. Traffic Inj Prev. 11(3):294–299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15389581003788898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Parenteau CS. 2016. Effectiveness of the revision to FMVSS 301: FARS and NASS-CDS analysis of fatalities and severe injuries in rear impacts. Accid Anal Prev. 89:1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Parenteau CS, Prasad P, Burnett R. 2008. Occupant responses in high-speed rear crashes: analysis of government-sponsored tests. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE 2008-01-0188.
   Google Scholar
• Woodrooffe J, Blower D. 2012, August. Performance characterization and safety effectiveness estimates of forward collision avoidance and mitigation systems for medium/heavy commercial vehicles. Report No. UMTRI–2011–36, UMTRI (August 2012). Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0067–0001.
   Google Scholar
• Woodrooffe J, Blower D, Flannagan CAC, Bogard SE, Bao S. 2013. Effectiveness of a current commercial vehicle forward collision avoidance and mitigation systems. Warrendale (PA): SAE International. Technical Paper No: 2013-01-2394. doi:https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-2394
   Google Scholar