Improving the safety relevance of automatic emergency braking testing programs: An examination of common characteristics of police-reported rear-end crashes in the United States

References

• Brumbelow ML. 2011. Crash test performance of large truck rear underride guards. Proceedings of the 22nd international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles; Washington, DC: Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchino JB, Zuby DS. 2019. Characteristics of rear-end crashes involving passenger vehicles with automatic emergency braking. Traffic Inj Prev. 20(sup1):S112–S118. doi:10.1080/15389588.2019.1576172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchino JB. 2017. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates. Accid Anal Prev. 99(Pt A):142–152. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elvik R. 2009. The power model of the relationship between speed and road safety: update and new analyses (TOI Report 1034/2009). Oslo, Norway: Institute of Transport Economics.
   Google Scholar
• European New Car Assessment Programme. 2021. Test protocol—AEB car-to-car systems (Version 3.0.2); Available at: https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/62794/euro-ncap-aeb-c2c-test-protocol-v303.pdf. Accessed June 13, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer CM. 2003. Reliability of police-reported information for determining crash and injury severity. Traffic Inj Prev. 4(1):38–44. doi:10.1080/15389580309855
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farmer CM. 2017. Relationship of traffic fatality rates to maximum state speed limits. Traffic Inj Prev. 18(4):375–380. doi:10.1080/15389588.2016.1213821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 2021. Large truck and bus crash facts 2019. (Report No. FMCSA-RRA-20-055) October. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Fildes B, Keall M, Bos N, Lie A, Page Y, Pastor C, Pennisi L, Rizzi M, Thomas P, Tingvall C. 2015. Effectiveness of low speed autonomous emergency braking in real-world rear-end crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 81:24–29. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. 2013. Autonomous emergency braking test protocol (Version I). Ruckersville, VA; October. Available at: https://www.iihs.org/media/a582abfb-7691-4805-81aa-16bbdf622992/REo1sA/Ratings/Protocols/current/test_protocol_aeb.pdf. Accessed June 13, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. U.S. 2016. DOT and IIHS announce historic commitment of 20 automakers to make automatic emergency braking standard on new vehicles. Arlington, VA: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety; March 17. Available at: https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/u-s-dot-and-iihs-announce-historic-commitment-of-20-automakers-to-make-automatic-emergency-braking-standard-on-new-vehicles. Accessed June 13, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Jermakian JS. 2011. Crash avoidance potential of four passenger vehicle technologies. Accid Anal Prev. 43(3):732–740. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees MN, Lee LD. 2007. The influence of distraction and driving context on driver response to imperfect collision warning systems. Ergonomics. 50(8):1264–1286. doi:10.1080/00140130701318749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenkeit J, Rhim S. 2018. Final report of crash imminent braking system confirmation testing of a 2018 Subaru Outback (Report No. OCAS-DRI-CIB-18-11). August. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie AJ, Kiefer RJ, Meitzner MR, Flannagan CA. 2021. Field effectiveness of general motors advanced driver assistance and headlighting systems. Accid Anal Prev. 159:106275. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morando A, Victor T, Dozza M. 2016. Drivers anticipate lead-vehicle conflicts during automated longitudinal control: sensory cues capture driver attention and promote appropriate and timely responses. Accid Anal Prev. 97:206–219. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najm W, Smith DL. 2004. Modeling driver response to lead vehicle decelerating (Technical Paper No. 2004-01-0171); Society of Automotive Engineers. doi:10.4271/2004-01-0171
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Statistics and Analysis. 2021. Traffic safety facts 2019. A compilation of motor vehicle crash data (Report No. DOT HS 813 141). August. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer R, Vahabaghaie A, Bahouth G, Drees L, von Bülow RM, Baur P. 2018. Field effectiveness evaluation of advanced driver assistance systems. Traffic Inj Prev. 19(sup2):S91–S95. doi:10.1080/15389588.2018.1527030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spicer R, Vahabaghaie A, Murakhovsky D, Bahouth G, Drayer B. 2021a. Effectiveness of advanced driver assistance systems in preventing system-relevant crashes. SAE Int J Advances & Curr Prac in Mobility. 3(4):1697–1701.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer R, Vahabaghaie A, Murakhovsky D, St. Lawrence S, Drayer B, Bahouth G. 2021b. Do driver characteristics and crash conditions modify the effectiveness of automatic emergency braking? SAE Int J Advances & Curr Prac. In Mobility. 3(3):1436–1440. doi:10.4271/2021-01-0874
   Google Scholar