Implementation and calibration of active small female and average male human body models using low-speed frontal sled tests

References

• Beeman SM, Kemper AR, Madigan ML, Franck CT, Loftus SC. 2012. Occupant kinematics in low-speed frontal sled tests: human volunteers, Hybrid III ATD, and PMHS. Accid Anal Prev. 47:128–139. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose D, Segui-Gomez M, Crandall JR. 2011. Vulnerability of female drivers involved in motor vehicle crashes: an analysis of US population at risk. Am J Public Health. 101(12):2368–2373. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brumbelow ML, Jermakian JS. 2021. Injury risks and crashworthiness benefits for females and males: which differences are physiological? Ruckersville (VA): Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
   Google Scholar
• Cappon H, Mordaka J, Van Rooij L, Adamec J, Praxl N, Muggenthaler H. 2007. A computational human model with stabilizing spine: a step towards active safety. SAE Technical Paper 0148–7191.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson S, Davidsson J. 2011. Volunteer occupant kinematics during driver initiated and autonomous braking when driving in real traffic environments. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the International Conference on Biomechanics of Impact IRCOBI, Krakow-Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Chan H, Albert DL, Gayzik FS, Kemper AR. 2021. Assessment of acclimation of 5th percentile female and 50th percentile male volunteer kinematics in low-speed frontal and frontal-oblique sled tests. SAE Int J Trans Saf. 9(1):3–103. doi:10.4271/09-09-01-0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan H, Devane KS, Albert DL, Gayzik FS, Kemper AR. 2021. Comparisons of initial joint angles and test buck reaction forces for relaxed and braced 5th percentile female and 50th percentile male volunteers and analogous active human body models in a simulated driver’s seat. IRCOBI.
   Google Scholar
• Davis ML, Koya B, Schap JM, Gayzik FS. 2016. Development and full body validation of a 5th percentile female finite element model. SAE Technical Paper 2016-22-0015.
   Google Scholar
• Devane K, Johnson D, Gayzik FS. 2019. Validation of a simplified human body model in relaxed and braced conditions in low-speed frontal sled tests. Traffic Inj Prev. 20(8):832–837. doi:10.1080/15389588.2019.1655733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejima S, Zama Y, Satou F, Holcombe S, Ono K, Kaneoka K, Shiina I. 2008. Prediction of the physical motion of the human body based on muscle activity during pre-impact braking. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the IRCOBI Conference, Bern, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Huber P, Kirschbichler S, Prüggler A, Steidl T. 2015. Passenger kinematics in braking, lane change and oblique driving maneuvers. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the IRCOBI, Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Iwamoto M, Nakahira Y. 2015. Development and validation of the Total HUman Model for Safety (THUMS) version 5 containing multiple 1d muscles for estimating occupant motions with muscle activation during side impacts. SAE Technical Paper 2015-22-0003.
   Google Scholar
• Iwamoto M, Nakahira Y, Kimpara H, Min K. 2013. Development of a finite element model of 5th percentile female with multiple muscles and its application to investigation on impact responses of elderly females. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 23rd ESV Conference, Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer R, Van Hassel E, Broos J, Elrofai H, Van Rooij L, Van Hooijdonk P. 2012. Development of a multi-body human model that predicts active and passive human behaviour. Paper Presented at: Proceedings of the International Conference on Biomechanics of Impact IRCOBI, Dublin-Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra A, Ghosh P, Chitteti R, Mayer C. 2020. Development of a Chinese 5th percentile female active human body model. IRCOBI Asia.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. 2019. Traffic safety facts 2017: a compilation of motor vehicle crash data. DOT HS. 812806.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. 2021. 2019 passenger vehicle traffic safety facts.
   Google Scholar
• Osth J, Brolin K, Brase D. 2015. A human body model with active muscles for simulation of pretensioned restraints in autonomous braking interventions. Traffic Inj Prev. 16:304–313. doi:10.1080/15389588.2014.931949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osth J, Olafsdottir JM, Davidsson J, Brolin K. 2013. Driver kinematic and muscle responses in braking events with standard and reversible pre-tensioned restraints: validation data for human models. Stapp Car Crash J. 57:1–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parenteau CS, Zuby D, Brolin K, Svensson MY, Palmertz C, Wang SC. 2013. Restrained male and female occupants in frontal crashes: are we different?. Paper presented at: 2013 IRCOBI Conference Proceedings, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Putra IPA, Iraeus J, Thomson R, Svensson MY, Linder A, Sato F. 2019. Comparison of control strategies for the cervical muscles of an average female head-neck finite element model. Traffic Inj Prev. 20(sup2):S116–S122. doi:10.1080/15389588.2019.1670818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MP, Ebert SM, Jones MLH, Park BKD, Hallman JJ, Sherony R. 2018. Passenger head kinematics in abrupt braking and lane change events. Traffic Inj Prev. 19(sup2):S70–S77. doi:10.1080/15389588.2018.1481957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarfare S, Maheshwari J, Duong N, Belwadi A. 2018. Comparative responses of the PIPER 6YO human body model and the Q6 ATD for simulated frontal and lateral impacts. SAE Technical Paper SC18-22-0006.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2018. Global status report on road safety 2018: summary. Geneva: World Health Organization; (WHO/NMH/NVI/18.20). License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
   Google Scholar