Increasing seat belt use in the United States by promoting and requiring more effective seat belt reminder systems

References

• Australasian New Car Assessment Program. 2022. ANCAP assessment protocol safety assist (Version 9.1). https://www.ancap.com.au/publications/ancap-assessment-protocol-safety-assist-v9-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bao S, Funkhouser DS, Buonarosa ML, Gilbert M, LeBlanc DJ, Ward NJ. 2020. Human factors research on seat belt assurance systems. Washington (DC): Department of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. DOT HS 812 838.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle JM, Lampkin C. 2008. 2007 motor vehicle occupant safety survey, volume 2: Seat belt report. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. DOT HS 810 975.
   Google Scholar
• CARHS GMBH. 2022. SafetyCompanion 2022. Alzenau, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd. 2021. C-NCAP management regulation (2021 Edition). https://c-ncap.org.cn/cms/picture/357347311580393472.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlstedt S. 1999. Non-users’ motives for not wearing the seat belt. Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI). VTI Rapport 417. Linköping, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• European New Car Assessment Programme. 2013. Assessment protocol—safety assist (version 5.6). https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/1440/euro-ncap-assessment-protocol-sa-v56.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European New Car Assessment Programme. 2018. Assessment protocol—safety assist (version 8.0.2). https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/32283/euro-ncap-assessment-protocol-sa-v802.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European New Car Assessment Programme. 2022. Assessment protocol—safety assist (version 9.1). https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/67254/euro-ncap-assessment-protocol-sa-v91.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer CM, Wells JK. 2010. Effect of enhanced seat belt reminders on driver fatality risk. J Saf Res. 41(1):53–57. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2009.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman M, Levi S, Zador P, Lopdell J, Bergeron E. 2007. The effectiveness of enhanced seat belt reminder systems—observational field data collection methodology and findings. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. DOT HS 810 844.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson SA, Wells JK, Kirley BB. 2007. Effectiveness and driver acceptance of the Honda belt reminder system. Traffic Inj Prev. 8(2):123–129. 10.1080/15389580601049968
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geller ES, Casali JG, Johnson RP. 1980. Seat belt usage: a potential target for applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 13(4):669–675. doi:10.1901/jaba.1980.13-669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global NCAP. 2021. Assessment protocol adult occupant protection: July 2022–December 2025. https://www.globalncap.org/s/assessment-protocol-Adult-2021.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. 2021. Seat belt reminder system test and rating protocol (version 1). https://www.iihs.org/media/f15e5be9-ac62-4ea6-a88d-7511105bfff5/H3hGKQ/Ratings/Protocols/current/Seat%20Belt%20Reminder%20Test%20Protocol.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Japan New Car Assessment Program. 2020. Seatbelt reminder evaluation test procedure (March 31, 2020 revision). https://www.nasva.go.jp/mamoru/en/download/R2-08_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jermakian JS, Weast RA. 2018. Passenger use of and attitudes toward rear seat belts. J Saf Res. 64:113–119. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2017.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd DG. 2012. Response of part-time belt users to enhanced seat belt reminder systems of different duty cycles and duration. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 15(5):525–534. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2012.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd DG, McCartt AT. 2014a. Drivers’ attitudes toward front or rear child passenger belt use and seat belt reminders at these seating positions. Traffic Inj Prev. 15(3):278–286. doi:10.1080/15389588.2013.810333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd DG, McCartt AT, Oesch NJ. 2014b. Attitudes toward seat belt use and in-vehicle technologies for encouraging belt use. Traffic Inj Prev. 15(1):10–17. doi:10.1080/15389588.2013.792111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd DG, Singer JS, Huey R, Kerfoot L. 2018. The effect of a gearshift interlock on seat belt use by drivers who do not always use a belt and its acceptance among those who do. J Saf Res. 65:39–51. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2018.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd DG, Singer J. 2019a. Consumer acceptance of enhanced seat belt reminders, a greashift interlock or different speed-limiting interlocks to encourage seat belt use following a brief hands-on experience. Saf Sci. 120:617–624. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd DG, Singer J. 2019b. The effects of persistent audible seat belt reminders and a speed-limiting interlock on the seat belt use of drivers who do not always use a seat belt. J Saf Res. 71:13–24. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krafft M, Kullgren A, Lie A, Tingvall C. 2006. The use of seat belts in cars with smart seat belt reminders—results of an observational study. Traffic Inj Prev. 7(2):125–129. doi:10.1080/15389580500509278
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Latin American & Caribbean New Car Assessment Programme. 2020. Assessment protocol—Safety assist 2020–2024 (version 1.1.2). https://www.latinncap.com/data/protocolos/covid-update/Latin%20NCAP%20Safety%20Assist%202020%20Assessment%20Protocol.%20v1.1.2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner N, Singer J, Huey R, Jenness J. 2007. Acceptability and potential effectiveness of enhanced seat belt reminder system features. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety System. Report No. DOT HS-810-848.
   Google Scholar
• Lie A. 2012. Nonconformities in real-world fatal crashes—electronic stability control and seat belt reminders. Traffic Inj Prev. 13(3):308–314. doi:10.1080/15389588.2011.653842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie A, Krafft M, Kullgren A, Tingvall C. 2008. Intelligent seat belt reminders—do they change driver seat belt use in Europe? Traffic Inj Prev. 9(5):446–449. doi:10.1080/15389580802149690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malenfant JEL, Van Houten R. 2008. Observations of how drivers fasten their seatbelts on relation to various startup tasks. Accid Anal Prev. 40(1):309–314. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2007.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGehee DV, Roe CA, Kasarla P, Wang C. 2022. Quantifying and recommending seat belt reminder timing using naturalistic driving video data. J Saf Res. 80:399–407. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2021.12.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motor Vehicle and School Bus Safety Amendments of 1974. Pub. L. No. 93-492, 88 Stat. 42, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act of 2012. Pub. L. No. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Nemire K. 2019. Warning signs to fasten seat belts result in higher rates of rear seat belt use in rideshare vehicles. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2019 Annual Meeting. Vol. 63. p. 2046–2050. doi:10.1177/1071181319631515
   Google Scholar
• New Car Assessment Program for Southeast Asian Countries. 2019. Assessment protocol—Safety assist (version 2). http://www.aseancap.org/v2/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/6.-ASEAN-NCAP-Assessment-Protocol-Safety-Assist-2.0_2019-FINAL_1-NOV-2019.p. df.
   Google Scholar
• Polson A, Lerner N, Burkhardt E, Piesse A, Zador P, Janniello E. 2021 Nov. Enhanced seat belt reminder systems: An observational study examining the relationship with seat belt use. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. DOT HS 812 808.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson LS, Haddon W. 1974. The buzzer-light reminder system and safety belt use. Am J Public Health. 64(8):814–815. doi:10.2105/ajph.64.8.814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard CR, Thomas FD, Blomberg RD, Brown JL, Wright T, Graham L, Lee J, Landgraf A. 2019 Nov. Characteristics and predictors of occasional seat belt use using Strategic Highway Research Program 2 data. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. DOT HS 812 840.
   Google Scholar
• Transport Canada. 2018. Technical standards document No. 208, Revision 1R: Occupant crash protection. https://tc.canada.ca/sites/default/files/migrated/tsd_208_rev_1r.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Transportation Research Board. 2003. Buckling up: Technologies to increase seat belt use. National Academy of Sciences. Special Report 278.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. 2022. U.N. Regulation No. 16, Rev. 10. https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2022-01/R016r10e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Van Houten R, Hilton B, Shulman R, Reagan I. 2011. Using haptic feedback to increase seat belt use of service vehicle drivers. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. DOT HS-811-434.
   Google Scholar
• Van Houten R, Malenfant JEL, Reagan I, Sifrit K, Compton R, Tenenbaum J. 2010. Increasing seat blet use in service vehicle drivers with a gearshift delay. J Appl Behav Anal. 43(3):369–380. doi:10.1901/jaba.2010.43-369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams AF, Wells JK. 2003. Drivers’ assessment of Ford’s belt reminder system. Traffic Inj Prev. 4(4):358–362. doi:10.1080/714040494
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams AF, Wells JK, Farmer CM. 2002. Effectiveness of Ford’s belt reminder system in increasing seat belt use. Inj Prev. 8(4):293–296. doi:10.1136/ip.8.4.293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young KL, Regan MA, Triggs TJ, Stephan K, Mitsopoulos-Rubens E, Tomasevic N. 2008. Field operational test of a seatbelt reminder system: Effects on driver behaviour and acceptance. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 11(6):434–444. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2008.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahane CJ. 2000 Dec. Fatality reduction by safety belts for front-seat occupants of cars and light trucks: Updated and expanded estimates based on 1986–99 FARS data. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. DOT HS 809 199.
   Google Scholar
• Eby DW, Molnar LJ, Kostyniuk LP, Shope JT. 2005 Jun 6–9. Developing an effective and acceptable safety belt reminder system. In: 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill B. 2001 Jan 11–13. Seat belt use: where we’ve been, where we are, and what’s next. 2001 Seat Belt Summit: Policy Options for Increasing Seat Belt Use in the United States in 2001 and Beyond, Appendix A. Arlington (VA): Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Axelsson A, Kullgren A. 2019 Jun 10–13. Seat belt use and effectiveness of seat belt reminders among children and young adults in real-world crashes. In: 26th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV): Technology; Enabling a Safer Tomorrow, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Kahane CJ. 2017 Feb. Fatality reduction by seat belts in the center rear seat and comparison of occupants’ relative fatality risk at various seating positions. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. DOT HS 812 369.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Statistics and Analysis. 2019 Mar. Lives saved in 2017 by restraint use and minimum-drinking-age laws. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. DOT HS 812 683.
   Google Scholar
• Enriquez J. 2021 Sep. Occupant restraint use in 2020: Results from the NOPUS controlled intersection study. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. DOT HS 810 975.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart T. 2022 Mar. Overview of motor vehicle crashes in 2020. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. DOT HS 813 266.
   Google Scholar