Investigation of factors influencing submarining mitigation with child booster seats

References

• Adomeit D, Heger A. 1975 . Motion sequence criteria and design proposals for restraint devices in order to avoid unfavorable biomechanic conditions and submarining. Stapp Car Crash Conference Proceedings . Paper 751146. 1975;19:139–165. San Diego, CA, November 17–19.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson M, Bohman K, Osvalder A-L. 2010. Effect of booster seat design on children’s choice of seating positions during naturalistic riding. Ann Adv Automot Med/Annu Sci Conf. 54:p. 171–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arbogast KB, Jermakian JS, Kallan MJ, Durbin DR. 2009. Effectiveness of belt positioning booster seats: an updated assessment. Pediatrics. 124(5):1281–1286. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beillas P, Giordano C, Alvarez V, Li X, Ying X, Chevalier M-C, Kirscht S, Kleiven S. 2016. Development and performance of the PIPER scalable child human body models. 14th International Conference on the Protection of Children in Cars.
   Google Scholar
• Berntsson J. 2018. A parametric study of shoulder belt interactions with the PIPER scalable child human body model in frontal and frontal offset impacts [Master’s thesis]. Chalmers University of Technology. https://odr.chalmers.se/handle/20.500.12380/256053.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman K, Östh J, Jakobsson L, Stockman I, Wimmerstedt M, Wallin H. 2020. Booster cushion design effects on child occupant kinematics and loading assessed using the PIPER 6-year-old HBM and the Q10 ATD in frontal impacts. Traffic Inj Prev. 21(sup1):S25–S30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2020.1795148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calinski T, Harabasz J. 1974. A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Comm Stats – Theory Methods. 3(1):1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Motor Vehicle Safety Standards No. 213. 2020. Motor vehicle restraint systems and booster seat safety regulations.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS), Unintentional Fatal Injury Data.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton J, Koppel S, Kopinathan C, Taranto D. 2010. How do children really behave in restraint systems while travelling in cars? Ann Adv Autom Med. 54:181–191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davies DL, Bouldin DW. 1979. A cluster separation measure. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1(2):224–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durbin DR, Arbogast KB, Moll EK. 2001. Seat belt syndrome in children: a case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Emerg Care. 17(6):474–477. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006565-200112000-00021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durbin DR, Elliott MR, Winston FK. 2003. Belt-positioning booster seats and reduction in risk of injury among children in vehicle crashes. JAMA. 289(21):2835–2840. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.21.2835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enriquez J. 2021. The 2019 national survey of the use of booster seats. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. DOT HS 813 033
   Google Scholar
• Fahlstedt M, Kleiven S, Li X. 2019. Current playground surface test standards underestimate brain injury risk for children. J Biomech. 89:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett J, Braunstein P. 1962. The seat belt syndrome. J Trauma. 2:220–238.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagedorn A, Stammen J. 2015. Comparative evaluation of 6-year-old Hybrid III and DAPRR prototype ATD abdomen/pelvis components. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy G, Cole W. 1993. The paediatric cervical seat belt syndrome. Injury. 24(5):297–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. 2018. Booster seat belt fit evaluation protocol (Version IV).
   Google Scholar
• Jermakian JS, Edwards M. 2017. Kinematics comparison between the Hybrid III 6 year-old with standard pelvis and modified pelvis with gel abdomen in booster sled tests. Proc. International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Impact.
   Google Scholar
• Jones MLH, Ebert S, Manary MA, Reed MP, Klinich KD. 2020. Child posture and belt fit in a range of booster configurations. IJERPH. 17(3):810. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent RW, Stacey S, Kindig MW, Forman JL, Woods WA, Rouhana SW, Higuchi K, Tanji H, Lawrence SS, Arbogast KB. 2006. Biomechanical response of the pediatric abdomen, part 1: development of an experimental model and quantification of structural response to dynamic belt loading. Stapp Car Crash J. 50:1–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kulowski K, Rost W. 1956. Intra-abdominal injury from safety belts in auto accidents. AMA Arch Surg. 73(6):970–971.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lane J. 1994. The seat belt syndrome in children. Accid Anal Prev. 26(6):813–820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari J, Duong N, Sarfare S, Belwadi A. 2019. Responses of a 6-year-old ATD restrained in a booster child seat on the FMVSS 213 test bench, proposed upgraded test bench and a vehicle seat in simulated frontal impacts. 26th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV): Technology: Enabling a Safer Tomorrow National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (Paper No. 19-0055).
   Google Scholar
• Maheshwari J, Sarfare S, Falciani C, Belwadi A. 2020a. Pediatric occupant human body model kinematic and kinetic response variation to changes in seating posture in simulated frontal impacts–with and without automatic emergency braking. Traffic Inj Prev. 21(sup1):S49–S53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maheshwari J, Sarfare S, Falciani C, Belwadi A. 2020b. Analysis of kinematic response of pediatric occupants seated in naturalistic positions in simulated frontal small offset impacts: with and without automatic emergency braking. Stapp Car Crash J. 64:31–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maltese MR, Tylko S, Belwadi A, Locey C, Arbogast KB. 2014. Comparative performance of forward-facing child restraint systems on the C/FMVSS 213 bench and vehicle seats. Traffic Inj Prev. 15(sup1):S103–S110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller M, Perez-Rapela D, Gepner B, Edwards M, Jermakian J, Forman J. 2021. A methodology for large-scale parametric evaluation of child booster seats. 2021 IRCOBI Conference Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Osvalder A, Hansson I, Stockman I, Carlsson A, Bohman K, Jakobsson L. 2013. Older children’s sitting postures, behaviour and comfort experience during ride—a comparison between an integrated booster cushion and a high-back booster. IRCOBI Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Rapela D, Forman JL, Huddleston SH, Crandall JR. 2021. Methodology for vehicle safety development and assessment accounting for occupant response variability to human and non-human factors. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 24(4):384–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2020.1830380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseeuw PJ. 1987. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J Comput Appl Math. 20:53–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson EM, Moll EK, Kassam-Adams N, Miller GJ, Winston FK. 2002. Barriers to booster seat use and strategies to increase their use. Pediatrics. 110(4):729–736. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.110.4.729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slusher G, Sarfare S, Falciani C, Belwadi A, Maheshwari J. 2022. Analysis of 6YO pediatric human body model kinematics and kinetics to determine submarining across naturalistic seating postures. Traffic Inj Prev. 2022:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Wietholter K, Louden AE, Echemendia C. 2021. Development of a representative seat assembly for FMVSS No. 213 (DOT HS 813 096). United States: Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar