Testing the acceptability of motorcycle-AEB system: Use of unanticipated interventions as a reliable surrogate of genuinely unexpected events

References

• Antov D, Banet A, Barbier C, Bellet T, Bimpeh Y, Boulanger A, et al. 2012. European road users’ risk perception and mobility: the SARTRE 4 survey.
   Google Scholar
• Beeman SM, Kemper AR, Madigan ML, Franck CT, Loftus SC. 2012. Occupant kinematics in low-speed frontal sled tests: human volunteers, hybrid III ATD, and PMHS. Accid Anal Prev. 47:128–139. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchino JB. 2017. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates. Accid Anal Prev. 99(Pt A):142–152. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cossalter V, Aguggiaro A, Debus D, Bellati A, Ambrogi A. 2007. Real cases motorcycle and rider race data investigation: fall behaviour analysis. Intern. Technical Conf. on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). Lyon, France; No. 07-0342.
   Google Scholar
• Cozby PC, Bates SC. 2018. Ethics in behavioral research. In: Methods in Behavioral Research. Thirteenth ed. McGraw-Hill Educ. p. 90–129.
   Google Scholar
• Davoodi SR, Hamid H, Pazhouhanfar M, Muttart JW. 2012. Motorcyclist perception response time in stopping sight distance situations. Saf Sci. 50(3):371–377. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejima S, Zama Y, Satou F, Holcombe S, Ono K, Kaneoka K, Shiina I. 2008. Prediction of the physical motion of the human body based on muscle activity during pre-impact braking. International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury – 2008 International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Injury, Proceedings. 163–175. (September).
   Google Scholar
• Graci V, Douglas E, Seacrist T, Kerrigan J, Mansfield J, Bolte J, Sherony R, Hallman J, Arbogast KB. 2019. Effect of automated versus manual emergency braking on rear seat adult and pediatric occupant precrash motion. Traffic Inj Prev. 20(sup1):S106–S111. doi:10.1080/15389588.2019.1630734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huertas-Leyva P, Baldanzini N, Savino G, Pierini M. 2021. Human error in motorcycle crashes: a methodology based on in-depth data to identify the skills needed and support training interventions for safe riding. Traffic Inj Prev. 22(4):294–300. doi:10.1080/15389588.2021.1896714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huertas-Leyva P, Nugent M, Savino G, Pierini M, Baldanzini N, Rosalie S. 2019. Emergency braking performance of motorcycle riders: skill identification in a real-life perception-action task designed for training purposes. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 63:93–107. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huertas-Leyva P, Savino G, Baldanzini N, Pierini M. 2020. Loss of control prediction for motorcycles during emergency braking maneuvers using a supervised learning algorithm. Applied Sciences. 10(5):1754. doi:10.3390/app10051754
   Google Scholar
• Kunze K, Lukowicz P, Partridge K, Begole B. 2009. Which way am I facing: Inferring horizontal device orientation from an accelerometer signal. Proceedings – International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC. IEEE. p. 149–150.
   Google Scholar
• Lucci C, Marra M, Huertas-Leyva P, Baldanzini N, Savino G. 2021. Investigating the feasibility of Motorcycle Autonomous Emergency Braking (MAEB): design criteria for new experiments to field test automatic braking. MethodsX. 8:101225. doi:10.1016/j.mex.2021.101225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkel NL, Pleß R, Winner H, Hammer T, Norbert S, Will S. 2019. Tolerability of unexpected autonomous emergency braking maneuvers on motorcycles – a methodology for experimental investigation. In 26th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). Eindhoven, The Netherlands: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; p. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Östh J, Ólafsdóttir JM, Davidsson J, Brolin K. 2013. Driver kinematic and muscle responses in braking events with standard and reversible pre-tensioned restraints: validation data for human models. Stapp Car Crash J. 57:1–41. doi:10.4271/2013-22-0001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Payre W, Diels C. 2020. I want to brake free: the effect of connected vehicle features on driver behaviour, usability and acceptance. Appl Ergon. 82. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savino G, Mackenzie J, Allen T, Baldock M, Brown J, Fitzharris M. 2016. A robust estimation of the effects of motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB) based on in-depth crashes in Australia. Traffic Inj Prev. 17(sup1):66–72. doi:10.1080/15389588.2016.1193171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savino G, Pierini M, Baldanzini N. 2012. Decision logic of an active braking system for powered two wheelers. J Automob Eng. 226(8):1026–1036. doi:10.1177/0954407011434445
   Google Scholar
• Savino G, Pierini M, Thompson J, Fitzharris M, Lenné MG. 2016. Exploratory field trial of motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB): considerations on the acceptability of unexpected automatic decelerations. Traffic Inj Prev. 17(8):855–862. doi:10.1080/15389588.2016.1155210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sponziello A, Frendo F, Guiggiani M. 2008. Stability analysis of a three-wheeled motorcycle. SAE International Journal of Engines, 1(1):1396–1401. doi:10.4271/2008-32-0062
   Google Scholar
• Symeonidis I, Kavadarli G, Erich S, Graw M, Peldschus S. 2012. Analysis of the stability of PTW riders in autonomous braking scenarios. Accid Anal Prev. 49:212–222. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2011.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. 2018. Global status report on road safety. Geneve: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565684
   Google Scholar
• Young MS, Stanton NA. 2007. Back to the future: brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles. Ergonomics. 50(1):46–58. doi:10.1080/00140130600980789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar