Drivers’ self-regulatory behaviors in active and responsive scenarios

References

• Alosco ML, Spitznagel MB, Fischer KH, Miller LA, Pillai V, Hughes J, Gunstad J. 2012. Both texting and eating are associated with impaired simulated driving performance. Traffic Inj Prev. 13(5):468–475. doi:10.1080/15389588.2012.676697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang BH, Oxley JA, Chen WS, Yap KK, Song KP, Lee SWH. 2019. To reduce or to cease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative studies on self-regulation of driving. J Saf Res. 70:243–251. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2019.07.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchley P, Atwood S, Boulton A. 2011. The choice to text and drive in younger drivers: Behavior may shape attitude. Accid Anal Prev. 43(1):134–142. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baike 2022. Respiratory rate. Available at: https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%91%BC%E5%90%B8%E9%A2%91%E7%8E%87/4212744.
   Google Scholar
• Ball K, Owsley C, Stalvey B, Roenker DL, Sloane ME, Graves M. 1998. Driving avoidance and functional impairment in older drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 30(3):313–322. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00102-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos JT, Santos PABD, Amancio EC, Gadda TMC, Ramalho JA, King MJ, Oviedo-Trespalacios O. 2020. Naturalistic driving study in Brazil: an analysis of mobile phone use behavior while driving. IJERPH. 17(17):6412. doi:10.3390/ijerph17176412.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan TM, Jr Jesson JE, Furlanetto PGA. 2019. Quantifying driver cell phone use at signalized intersections using software-defined radio. Traffic Inj Prev. 20(4):359–364. doi:10.1080/15389588.2019.1592167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y. 2013. Stress state of driver: mobile phone use while driving. ProcedSocial Behav Sci. 96:12–16. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.004.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary P, Velaga NR. 2017. Mobile phone use during driving: Effects on speed and effectiveness of driver compensatory behaviour. Accid Anal Prev. 106:370–378. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.06.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoph M, Wesseling S, van Nes N. 2019. Self-regulation of drivers’ mobile phone use: The influence of driving context. Transp Res Pt F-Traffic Psychol Behav. 66:262–272. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller R. 2011. Driver control theory: From task difficulty homeostasis to risk allostasis. In: Porter BE, editor. Handbook of traffic psychology . London (UK): Elsevier. p. 13–26. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-381984-0.10002-5.
   Google Scholar
• Grassmann M, Vlemincx E, Von Leupoldt A, Mittelstädt JM, Van den Bergh O. 2016. Respiratory changes in response to cognitive load: a systematic review. Neural Plast. 2016:8146809. doi:10.1155/2016/8146809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwyther H, Holland C. 2012. The effect of age, gender and attitudes on self-regulation in driving. Accid Anal Prev. 45:19–28. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2011.11.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakamies-Blomqvist L, Wahlström B. 1998. Why do older drivers give up driving? Accid Anal Prev. 30(3):305–312. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00106-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan AS, Patel D, Alfaris R, Jalayer M. 2022. Identifying distracted-driving events from on-road observations using a moving vehicle: a case study in New Jersey. Accid Anal Prev. 177:106827. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2022.106827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo-Muñoz AR, Béquet AJ, Astier-Juvenon M, Pépin G, Fort A, Jallais C, Tattegrain H, Gabaude C. 2019. Respiration and heart rate modulation due to competing cognitive tasks while driving. Front Hum Neurosci. 12:525. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MM, Zhou H, Rahman MA, Das S, Sun X. 2022. Cellphone-distracted crashes of novice teen drivers: Understanding associations of contributing factors for crash severity levels and cellphone usage types. Traffic Inj Prev. 23(7):390–397. doi:10.1080/15389588.2022.2097667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröling S, Gehlert T, Wolfermann A. 2022. Contribution of traffic behavior surveys for monitoring safety performance indicators in Germany: case of mobile phone use while driving. IATSS Res. 46(1):93–100. doi:10.1016/j.iatssr.2021.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohani M, Payne BR, Strayer DL. 2019. A review of psychophysiological measures to assess cognitive states in real-world driving. Front Hum Neurosci. 13:57. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehler B, Reimer B, Coughlin JF, Dusek JA. 2009. Impact of incremental increases in cognitive workload on physiological arousal and performance in young adult drivers. Transport Res Record. 2138(1):6–12. doi:10.3141/2138-02.
   Google Scholar
• Nasr Esfahani H, Arvin R, Song Z, Sze NN. 2021. Prevalence of cell phone use while driving and its impact on driving performance, focusing on near-crash risk: A survey study in Tehran. J Transp Saf Secur. 13(9):957–977. doi:10.1080/19439962.2019.1701166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien NP, Goodwin AH, Foss RD. 2010. Talking and texting among teenage drivers: a glass half empty or half full? Traffic Inj Prev. 11(6):549–554. doi:10.1080/15389588.2010.516036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oviedo-Trespalacios O. 2018. Getting away with texting: Behavioural adaptation of drivers engaging in visual-manual tasks while driving. Transp Res Pt A-Policy Pract. 116:112–121. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2018.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oviedo-Trespalacios O, Haque MM, King M, Washington S. 2019. “Mate! I’m running 10 min late”: An investigation into the self-regulation of mobile phone tasks while driving. Accid Anal Prev. 122:134–142. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oviedo-Trespalacios O, King M, Haque MM, Washington S. 2017. Risk factors of mobile phone use while driving in Queensland: prevalence, attitudes, crash risk perception, and task-management strategies. PLoS One. 12(9):e0183361. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnell KJ, Rand J, Plant KL. 2020. A diary study of distracted driving behaviours. Transp Res Pt F-Traffic Psychol Behav. 74:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2020.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prat F, Gras ME, Planes M, Font-Mayolas S, Sullman MJM. 2017. Driving distractions: An insight gained from roadside interviews on their prevalence and factors associated with driver distraction. Transp Res Pt F-Traffic Psychol Behav. 45:194–207. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu W, Ge Y, Guo Y, Sun X, Zhang K. 2020. The influence of WeChat use on driving behavior in China: a study based on the theory of planned behavior. Accid Anal Prev. 144:105641. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rendon-Velez E, Van Leeuwen PM, Happee R, Horváth I, van der Vegte WF, De Winter JCF. 2016. The effects of time pressure on driver performance and physiological activity: a driving simulator study. Transp Res Pt F-Traffic Psychol Behav. 41:150–169. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Zhou R. 2017. Driving Under Voluntary and Involuntary Distraction: An Empirical Study of Compensatory Behaviors. In International Conference on HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations (p. 374–386). Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58481-2_29.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanidis KB, Truelove V, Freeman J, Mills L, Nicolls M, Sutherland K, Davey J. 2022. A double-edged sword? Identifying the influence of peers, mass and social media on engagement in mobile phone use while driving. Transp Res Pt F-Traffic Psychol Behav. 87:19–29. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2022.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tencent 2021. Tencent Announces 2021 Third Quarter Results [press release]. Available at: https://static.www.tencent.com/uploads/2021/11/10/57d32da50c1d7abe221d7f9ca9ec3dcb.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tencent 2022. In-car version of WeChat [press release]. Available at: https://car.weixin.qq.com/#/.
   Google Scholar
• Waddell LP, Wiener KK. 2014. What’s driving illegal mobile phone use? Psychosocial influences on drivers’ intentions to use hand-held mobile phones. Transp Res Pt F-Traffic Psychol Behav. 22:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2013.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde GJ. 1998. Risk homeostasis theory: an overview. Inj Prev. 4(2):89–91. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ip.4.2.89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yan W, Xiang W, Wong SC, Yan X, Li YC, Hao W. 2018. Effects of hands-free cellular phone conversational cognitive tasks on driving stability based on driving simulation experiment. Transp Res Pt F-Traffic Psychol Behav. 58:264–281. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young KL, Lenné MG. 2010. Driver engagement in distracting activities and the strategies used to minimise risk. Saf Sci. 48(3):326–332. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2009.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young KL, Regan MA, Lee JD. 2008. Factors moderating the impact of distraction on driving performance and safety. In: Regan MA, Lee JD, Young KL, editors. Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group. p. 335–352. doi:10.1201/9781420007497.pt6.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou R, Rau PLP, Zhang W, Zhuang D. 2012. Mobile phone use while driving: predicting drivers’ answering intentions and compensatory decisions. Saf Sci. 50(1):138–149. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou R, Yu M, Wang X. 2016. Why do drivers use mobile phones while driving? The contribution of compensatory beliefs. PLoS One. 11(8):e0160288. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou R, Zhang Y, Shi Y. 2020. Driver’s distracted behavior: The contribution of compensatory beliefs increases with higher perceived risk. Int J Ind Ergon. 80:103009. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu G, Wang J, Zhang Y, Hu H. 2017. The influence of using WeChat on driving safety and countermeasures. Chin Inform Commun. 15(6):88–92.
   Google Scholar