Driver response and recovery following automation initiated disengagement in real-world hands-free driving

References

• Abraham H, McAnulty H, Mehler B, Reimer B. 2017. Case study of today’s automotive dealerships: introduction and delivery of advanced driver assistance systems. Transp Res Rec. 2660(1):7–14. doi:10.3141/2660-02.
   Google Scholar
• Banks VA, Eriksson A, O’Donoghue J, Stanton NA. 2018. Is partially automated driving a bad idea? Observations from an on-road study. Appl Ergon. 68:138–145. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.11.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donmez B, Boyle LN, Lee JD. 2009. Designing feedback to mitigate distraction. In: Regan MA, Lee JD, Young KL, editors. Driver distraction: Theory, effects and mitigation. London: CRC Press; p. 519–531.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson A, Stanton NA. 2017. Takeover time in highly automated vehicles: noncritical transitions to and from manual control. Hum Factors. 59(4):689–705. doi:10.1177/0018720816685832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridman L, Brown DE, Glazer M. 2019. MIT advanced vehicle technology study: large-scale naturalistic driving study of driver behavior and interaction with automation. IEEE Access. 7:102021–102038. doi:10.1109/access.2019.2926040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspar J, Carney C. 2019. The effect of partial automation on driver attention: a naturalistic driving study. Hum Factors. 61(8):1261–1276. doi:10.1177/0018720819836310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraci M, Bottai M. 2014. Linear quantile mixed models. Stat Comput. 24(3):461–479. doi:10.1007/s11222-013-9381-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershon P, Seaman S, Mehler B, Reimer B, Coughlin J. 2021. Driver behavior and the use of automation in real-world driving. Accid Anal Prev. 158:106217. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106217.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu W, Cicchino JB, Reagan IJ, Monfort SS, Gershon P, Mehler B, Reimer B. 2022. Use of level 1 and 2 driving automation on horizontal curves on interstates and freeways. Transp Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 89:64–71. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2022.06.008
   Google Scholar
• Killick R, Fearnhead P, Eckley IA. 2012. Optimal detection of changepoints with a linear computational cost. J Am Stat Assoc. 107(500):1590–1598. doi:10.1080/01621459.2012.737745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PC, Schmidt P, Shin Y. 1992. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? J Econom. 54(1–3):159–178. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JD, Moeckli J, Brown TL, Roberts SC, Schwarz C, Yekhshatyan L, Nadler E, Liang Y, Victor T, Marshall D, et al. 2013. Distraction detection and mitigation through driver feedback (No. DOT HS 811 547A).
   Google Scholar
• Lin R, Ma L, Zhang W. 2018. An interview study exploring Tesla drivers’ behavioural adaptation. Appl Ergon. 72:37–47. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2018.04.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louw T, Markkula G, Boer E, Madigan R, Carsten O, Merat N. 2017. Coming back into the loop: drivers’ perceptual-motor performance in critical events after automated driving. Accid Anal Prev. 108:9–18. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louw T, Merat N. 2017. Are you in the loop? Using gaze dispersion to understand driver visual attention during vehicle automation. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 76:35–50. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv C, Cao D, Zhao Y, et al. 2017. Analysis of autopilot disengagements occurring during autonomous vehicle testing. IEEE/CAA J Autom Sin. 5(1):58–68. doi:10.1109/jas.2017.7510745.
   Google Scholar
• Morando A, Gershon P, Mehler B, Reimer B. 2021a. Visual attention and steering wheel control: from engagement to disengagement of Tesla Autopilot. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 65(1):1390–1394. doi:10.1177/1071181321651118.
   Google Scholar
• Morando A, Gershon P, Mehler B, Reimer B. 2021b. A model for naturalistic glance behavior around Tesla Autopilot disengagements. Accid Anal Prev. 161:106348. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parasuraman R, Riley V. 1997. Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum Factors. 39(2):230–253. doi:10.1518/001872097778543886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reagan IJ, Cicchino JB, Kidd DG. 2020. Driver acceptance of partial automation after a brief exposure. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 68:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.11.015.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer B. 2020. Should Tesla take the initiative to better monitor and manage driver behavior with Autopilot. Forbes.
   Google Scholar
• SAE International. 2018. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles (SAE Standard J3016, Report No. J3016-201806). Warrendale (PA): SAE.
   Google Scholar
• Teoh ER. 2020. What’s in a name? Drivers’ perceptions of the use of five SAE Level 2 driving automation systems. J Safety Res. 72:145–151. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2019.11.005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Victor TW, Tivesten E, Gustavsson P, Johansson J, Sangberg F, Ljung Aust M. 2018. Automation expectation mismatch: incorrect prediction despite eyes on threat and hands on wheel. Hum Factors. 60(8):1095–1116. doi:10.1177/0018720818788164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang S, Kuo J, Lenné MG. 2021. Effects of distraction in on-road Level 2 automated driving: impacts on glance behavior and takeover performance. Hum Factors. 63(8):1485–1497. doi:10.1177/0018720820936793.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar