251
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The effect of perceived global stress and altruism on prosocial driving behavior, yielding behavior, and yielding attitude

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 402-408 | Received 03 Sep 2022, Accepted 13 Mar 2023, Published online: 13 Apr 2023

References

  • Aghababaei N. 2014. Attitudes towards euthanasia in Iran: The role of altruism. J Med Ethics. 40(3):173–176.
  • Balters S, Bernstein M, Paredes PE. 2019. On-road stress analysis for in-car interventions during the commute. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–6); May.
  • Batson CD. 1998. Altruism and prosocial behavior. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, editors. Handbook of social psychology. Boston: McGraw-Hill. p. 282–316.
  • Baumeister RF, Bushman BJ. 2008. Social psychology and human nature. Belmont (CA): Thomson.
  • Bell ML, Kelley-Baker T, Rider R, Ringwalt C. 2005. Protecting you/protecting me: Effects of an alcohol prevention and vehicle safety program on elementary students. J School Health. 75(5):171–177.
  • Breckler SJ. 1984. Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. J Pers Soc Psychol. 47(6):1191–1205.
  • Brondolo E, Grantham KI, Karlin W, Taravella J, Mencía-Ripley A, Schwartz JE, Contrada RJ. 2009. Trait hostility and ambulatory blood pressure among traffic enforcement agents: The effects of stressful social interactions. J Occupational Health Psychol. 14(2):110.
  • Brookhuis KA, Waard D. 2010. D. Monitoring drivers’ mental workload in driving simulators using physiological measures. Accident Anal Prev. 42(3):898–903.
  • Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. 1983. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health and Soc Behav. 24(4):385–396.
  • De Waard D. 1996. The measurement of drivers’ mental workload [Thesis fully internal (DIV), University of Groningen]. s.n.
  • Eysenck M, Derakshan N, Santos R, Calvo M. 2007. Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion. 7(2):336–353.
  • Fabes RA, Carlo G, Kupanoff K, Laible D. 1999. Early adolescence and prosocial/moral behavior I: The role of individual processes. J Early Adolescence. 19(1):5–16.
  • Ge Y, Qu W, Jiang C, Du F, Sun X, Zhang K. 2014. The effect of stress and personality on dangerous driving behavior among Chinese drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 73:34–40.
  • Glasman LR, Albarracín D. 2006. Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychol Bull. 132(5):778–822.
  • Goldberg L, Johnson J, Eber H, Hogan R, Ashton M, Cloninger C, Gough H. 2006. The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. J Res Personality. 40(1):84–96.
  • Gorsuch R. 1983. Factor analysis. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Grossmann T, Missana M, Vaish A. 2020. Helping, fast and slow: Exploring intuitive cooperation in early ontogeny. Cognition. 196:104144.
  • Guo M, Wei W, Liao G, Chu F. 2016. The impact of personality on driving safety among Chinese high-speed railway drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 92:9–14.
  • Harris PB, Houston JM, Vazquez JA, Smither JA, Harms A, Dahlke JA, Sachau DA. 2014. The Prosocial and Aggressive Driving Inventory (PADI): A self-report measure of safe and unsafe driving behaviors. Accident Anal Prev. 72:1–8.
  • Hayes AF. 2018. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Kaya N, Girgis J, Hansma B, Donmez B. 2021. Hey, watch where you’re going! An on-road study of driver scanning failures towards pedestrians and cyclists. Accident Anal Prev. 162:106380.
  • Kopp MS, Thege BK, Balog P, Stauder A, Salavecz G, Rózsa S, Ádám S. 2010. Measures of stress in epidemiological research. J Psychosomatic Res. 69(2):211–225.
  • Le H, Oh IS, Robbins SB, Ilies R, Holland E, Westrick P. 2011. Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. J Appl Psychol. 96(1):113.
  • Li H, Hu H, Zhang Z, Zhang Y. 2023. The role of yielding cameras in pedestrian-vehicle interactions at un-signalized crosswalks: An application of game theoretical model. Transport Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 92:27–43.
  • Li H, Zhang Z, Sze NN, Hu H, Ding H. 2021. Safety effects of law enforcement cameras at non-signalized crosswalks: A case study in China. Accid Anal Prev. 156:106124.
  • Matsumoto Y, Yamagishi T, Li Y, Kiyonari T. 2016. Prosocial behavior increases with age across five economic games. PLoS One. 11(7):e0158671.
  • Monteiro RP, de Holanda Coelho GL, Hanel PH, Pimentel CE, Gouveia VV. 2018. Personality, dangerous driving, and involvement in accidents: Testing a contextual mediated model. Transport Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 58:106–114.
  • Morton RD, White MJ. 2013. Revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: The impact of FFFS and stress on driving. Personality and Individual Diff. 54(1):57–63.
  • Nanjing Municipal Public Security Bureau. 2017. Law Enforcement Cameras Have Been Installed to Capture Non-yielding Behavior in Nanjing [EB/OL]. [accessed 2022 Nov 1]. http://gaj.nanjing.gov.cn/jtgl/201706/t2017.
  • National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2018. International Statistical Yearbook 2018. [accessed 2023 Jan 31]. https://data.stats.gov.cn/files/lastestpub/gjnj/2018/zk/indexch.htm.
  • National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2019. China statistical yearbook——2019. [accessed 2022 Nov 1]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2019/indexch.htm.
  • Pejhan S, Agelin-Chaab M, Yusuf M, Eng D. 2021. Analysis of ebike dynamics and cyclists’ anxiety levels and interactions with road vehicles that influence safety. Accident Anal Prev. 159:106272.
  • Portnoy J, Raine A, Rudo-Hutt AS, Gao Y, Monk K. 2020. Heart rate reactivity, neighborhood disadvantage, and antisocial behavior. Crime & Delinquency. 66(10):1392–1418.
  • Road Traffic Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China. 2021. Road Traffic Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China § 90. http://www.anlu.gov.cn/pfxc/1394082.jhtml.
  • Schneider RJ, Qin X, Shaon MRR, Sanatizadeh A, He Z, Wkyhuis P, Bill A. 2017. Evaluation of driver yielding to pedestrians at uncontrolled crosswalks. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison Traffic Operations and Safety (TOPS) Laboratory.
  • Shen B, Ge Y, Qu W, Sun X, Zhang K. 2018a. The different effects of personality on prosocial and aggressive driving behaviour in a Chinese sample. Transportation Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 56:268–279.
  • Shen B, Qu W, Ge Y, Sun X, Zhang K. 2018b. The relationship between personalities and self-report positive driving behavior in a Chinese sample. PLoS One. 13(1):e0190746.
  • Sparrow EP, Swirsky LT, Kudus F, Spaniol J. 2021. Aging and altruism: A meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 36(1):49.
  • Wang Z, Wang Y, Wu ZG, Chen DD, Chen Y, Xiao ZP. 2015. Reliablity and validity of the Chinese version of Perceived Stress Scale. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Med Sci). 35(10):1448–1451.
  • Wang Y, Zhao N, Liu X, Karaburun S, Chen M, Zhu T. 2020. Identifying big five personality traits through controller area network bus data. J Adv Transp. 2020:8866876.
  • World Health Organization. 2020. Road traffic injuries: Key facts. [accessed 2022 Sep 3]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/road-traffic-injuries.
  • Yang J. 2013. The effects of personality characteristics on driving safety and the moderate effects of situational variables [Master’s Degree Thesis]. University of Chinese Academy of Science.
  • Yerkes RM, Dodson JD. 1908. The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. J Comparative Neurol Psychol. 18(5):459–482.
  • Zhou X, Ma L, Zhang W. 2022. Event-related driver stress detection with smartphones among young novice drivers. Ergonomics. 65(8):1154–1172.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.